Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 09 2024

• 
  • Nomination Bunkers 26 and 27 in the Dülmen-Visbeck special ammunition depot, Dernekamp, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hohengüßbach Visitation of the Virgin Mary, aerial view --Ermell 04:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the centre of Kirchschletten --Ermell 04:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:37, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pipe organ in the Catholic parish church of St John the Baptist in Kirchschletten --Ermell 04:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:37, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the centre of Kirchschletten --Ermell 04:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Solar halo photographed from Shalkar village, Karasay District, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. By User:RS128 --Красный 04:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Marwenwafi 04:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern part of the main street in Gompertshausen --Plozessor 04:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 04:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Hidden Kingdom of Ming in the (Hortus Haren Groningen), walled courtyard.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Half-opened flower bud of a Meconopsis cambrica, Welsh poppy. Focus stack of 52 photos.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Library of Hadrian, Athens --Jakubhal 03:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Teatr z Kapelusza in the show "Help! To Rescue the Dying Nature!" at 37. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 03:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lyapunov in the show "Sky Explorer" at 37. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 03:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lyapunov in the show "Sky Explorer" at 37. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 03:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pskem river in Ugom Chatkal National Park, Uzbekistan. By User:Arina Pan --Екатерина Борисова 03:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charvak Reservoir‎ in Ugom Chatkal National Park, Uzbekistan. By User:Arina Pan --Екатерина Борисова 03:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Flora, Summer Garden, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fawn with the kid Fountain, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flagpole holder on Hendrik van Gilse van der Pals mansion, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Megjid Janraisig temple, Gandantegchinlen Monastery, Ulan Bator, Mongolia --Bgag 02:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gate of Green Palace, Ulan Bator, Mongolia --Bgag 02:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door knocker at the Green Palace, Ulan Bator, Mongolia --Bgag 02:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Horse racing at Naadam Festival 2023, near Ulan Bator, Mongolia --Bgag 02:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chiwen at the Green Palace, Ulan Bator, Mongolia --Bgag 02:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Impressionen aus dem Naturschutzgebiet "Herrenmoor bei Kleve" --Nightflyer 01:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. If possible, please identify the trees --Tagooty 02:46, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Impressionen von der Zeche "Zollern 2/4" in Dortmund. Hier: Plakat aus der damaligen Lehrwerkstatt (heute in der Dauerausstellung) --Nightflyer 01:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Impressionen aus dem Landschaftsschutzgebiet "Hohenfelder Moor" im Kreis Steinburg, Schleswig-Holstein. --Nightflyer 01:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vineyard in Friedlach, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory’s north portal in Friedlach #13, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Barred window at the rectory in Friedlach #13, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Defense tower at the defense cemetery in Friedlach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Defense tower at the parish church Saint George in Friedlach, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper section, Mallalli Falls, Hassan, Karnataka, India --Tagooty 01:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House, Inakanahalli, Somwarpet taluk, Coorg --Tagooty 01:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coffee estate road, Inakanahalli, Coorg, Karnataka --Tagooty 01:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential houses, Inakanahalli, Coorg --Tagooty 01:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View downstream from base of Mallalli Falls during the SW monsoon, Hassan --Tagooty 01:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination V8 marine engine at Interboot 2023 in Friedrichshafen, Germany --MB-one 22:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Top down view of Kenchreai basilica, Korinthia. --C messier 22:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The byzantine church of Panaya Bafero in Stemnitsa, Arcadia. --C messier 22:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The byzantine church of Zoodochos Pigi in Stemnitsa, Arcadia. --C messier 22:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell of the Zoodochos Pigi church in Stemnitsa, Arcadia. --C messier 22:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West 3rd and Main in Chico, California --Frank Schulenburg 20:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Siamese cat in the park. --Felinlove 19:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European greenfinch (Chloris chloris) at Ichkeul NPI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --El Golli Mohamed 17:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eurasian sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) in El HaouariaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --El Golli Mohamed 17:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 21:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus) in Ichkeul NPI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --El Golli Mohamed 17:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 21:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White Wagtail (Motacilla alba) at Jebil NPI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --El Golli Mohamed 17:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good Quality --Felinlove 19:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa) in ThynaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --El Golli Mohamed 17:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Banks of the Elbe --Georgfotoart 17:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Banks of the Elbe --Georgfotoart 17:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Broquies, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic view of Conques, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 17:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oratory in Canet-de-Salars, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common seal (Phoca vitulina) --Charlesjsharp 14:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 22:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) --Charlesjsharp 14:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Amazon kingfisher (Chloroceryle amazona) male --Charlesjsharp 14:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 22:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black skimmer (Rynchops niger) --Charlesjsharp 14:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Красный 04:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brazilian burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia grallaria) --Charlesjsharp 14:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 22:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Composting toilet in Darmstadt-Eberstadt, Germany --AlexanderKlink 13:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Piano hammers and strings. By User:Mozzihh --Augustgeyler 12:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Handcycles at the Berlin Marathon 2021. By User:GPSLeo --Augustgeyler 12:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Two students", sculpture in Raamsdonksveer --ReneeWrites 10:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Well composed. But  Level of detail too low , loss of texture and not sharp enough. --Augustgeyler 10:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture "Miller" in Made --ReneeWrites 10:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Low Level of detail and tilt/perspective correction missing --Poco a poco 10:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW U10 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 09:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lovell Telescope, Jodrell Bank Observatory --Mike Peel 09:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ceratotherium simum in Knowsley Safari Park --Mike Peel 09:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ferrari SF90 Spider in Böblingen --Alexander-93 08:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Just too many blowen out highlights here. --Augustgeyler 12:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ford Tourneo Custom in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacking sharpness and blown out highlights with artefacts in the background. --Augustgeyler 12:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chaniotis beach, Kassandra --PetarM 08:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Small red scorpionfish (Scorpaena notata), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. --Poco a poco 07:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common sole (Solea solea), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. --Poco a poco 07:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common sole (Solea solea), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. --Poco a poco 07:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. --Poco a poco 07:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spiny lobster (Palinurus elephas), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. --Poco a poco 07:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brest-Central railway station, Brest. --Mike1979 Russia 07:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support A bit soft but OK. --Augustgeyler 10:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Suburban station, Warsaw side, Brest-Central railway station, Brest. --Mike1979 Russia 07:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 11:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination North gate of the Brest Fortress, Brest. --Mike1979 Russia 07:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fortress church of Saint Nicholas in the Brest Fortress, Brest. --Mike1979 Russia 07:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque near Chełm Gate, Brest Fortress, Brest. --Mike1979 Russia 07:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Caterpillar 308E2 CR mini excavator parked in Campbell, California. --Grendelkhan 07:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Dull light, borderline level of detail and composition disturbed by metallic object in the foreground. --Augustgeyler 12:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Rue Henri Paris, in Tourcoing, France --Velvet 06:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Radomianin 06:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pizzeria, Rue du Touquet 229, in Tourcoing, France --Velvet 06:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Radomianin 06:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wienerstraße 6 in Amstetten, Lower Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hauptplatz 32 in Amstetten, Lower Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kirchenplatz 4 in Enns, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Big Almaty lake in Ile-Alatau national park. Bostandyk District, Almaty, Kazakhstan. By User:Exxocette --Красный 04:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Pretty, but quite small with missing metadata. Possibly downscaled --Jakubhal 05:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lower Kolsay lake. Kolsay lakes national park, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Marat Rysbekov --Красный 04:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --SHB2000 05:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lower Kolsay lake. Kolsay lakes national park, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Marat Rysbekov --Красный 04:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lower Kolsay lake. Kolsay lakes national park, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Marat Rysbekov --Красный 04:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --SHB2000 05:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gyedong-gil street with a building facade covered with climbing plants and a café with open windows, at golden hour, in Bukchon Hanok Village, Seoul, South Korea. --Basile Morin 02:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    What is this blurry spot that I marked in an image note? --Plozessor 03:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
    Please don't use image notes on file pages in relation with QIC. Per Commons:Image annotations#Examples of inappropriate and not-informative notes: "notes used to point out details of the image related to a discussion, for example on COM:FPC or COM:DR pages." By the way, I couldn't find any "blurry spot". Can you explain? --Basile Morin 05:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
    Sorry, I saw others doing this and did not think whether it is a good practice; thanks for telling me. With the "blurry spot" I'm referring to this structure, I can't explain what that is: https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOkFt3B7t2z2Qp1i4YwOzNTwVSnZoyItXC1uMm6WTqun-GpmXWGaSDs7UsRZVRA-g?key=NFJtWU9rR0g4M09tTmowSTJHY2F0UGxaODU2dENn --Plozessor 05:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
    Thanks for your link. Absolutely no idea what it is, but definitely present on my original photo. Tried to find it on Google map and could not zoom to this place. Not an error in any case. --Basile Morin 06:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support If this a single shot and not a kind of focus stacking etc. then ok, the picture is really good. --Plozessor 06:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open wing basking of Athyma inara Westwood, 1850 – Colour Sergeant (Female). By User:Subhendukhan --Atudu 23:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination squirrel in Kyiv, Ukraine. By User:VladislavWikip --Luda.slominska 20:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Renault Rafale in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 13:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW M4 (G82) Competition in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 13:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 11:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volkswagen Jetta VI GLI in Stuttagrt --Alexander-93 12:16, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Agave × leopoldii at Jardin de Cactus in 2022. --Mike Peel 06:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 11:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jewel anemone (Corynactis viridis), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. --Poco a poco 06:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 11:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Slender-billed gull (Chroicocephalus genei) at Tunis lakeI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --El Golli Mohamed 21:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Partial open wing Nectaring of Danaus genutia (Cramer, 1779) - Striped Tiger (Female) --Sandipoutsider 09:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oriental Shorthair cat --Felinlove 19:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Granada (Andalusia, Spain) - Alhambra - Palacios nazaríes - Palacio de los Leones - Arabesques in the Patio de los Leones --Benjism89 14:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Question It is a nice image. Did you apply perspective correction here? --Augustgeyler 23:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
    Yes, but just a small one. This was shot at 125 mm so no need for strong PC. --Benjism89 12:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality.  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 22:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hyla carthaginiensis, communément appelé Rainette de Carthage dans le parc national d'El Feija. By User:Slim Alileche --TOUMOU 23:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.  Support --Georgfotoart 17:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marsh sandpiper (Tringa stagnatilis) in ThynaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --El Golli Mohamed 22:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common greenshank (Tringa nebularia) in Tunis lakeI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --El Golli Mohamed 22:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fiat Ritmo Cabrio S 85 in Böblingen --Alexander-93 16:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 11:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination [edit] Tirumala septentrionis (Butler, 1874) - Dark Blue Tiger. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 08:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:47, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Papilio paris (Linnaeus,1758) - Paris Peacock. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 08:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination REVAi in Camden, Greater London --MB-one 08:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --SHB2000 04:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Elephants on Cedar Hills, Beaverton, Oregon, US --Another Believer 03:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Leaning out on the right (clearly visible in the upper right corner). --Plozessor 03:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Beautiful sunset in Kurigram, Bangladesh.--Tanvir Rahat 02:34, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Not sure about the burned out sun, but at least it must be rotated correctly. --Plozessor 03:48, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ferrari SF90 Spider in Böblingen --Alexander-93 15:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 11:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pseudocistela Crotch on a cowbane flowerI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Bill.pix 12:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Flowers are blown out and not sharp enough, sorry --Екатерина Борисова 03:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Female baya weaver inspecting the newly built nest while the male watches over. By User:Mildeep --Nirmal Dulal 10:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This has strange noise distribution which indicates AI processing gone wrong --Plozessor 03:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Float "Emptiness" at the 2023 flower parade in Zundert --ReneeWrites 09:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose People clearly recognizable --Georgfotoart 16:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orb weaver spider (Argiope flavipalpis) female on web --Charlesjsharp 08:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grossostheim, protected landscape element 'Kleine und grosse Hochshohle' in landscape protection area 'LSG innerhalb des Naturparks Bayerischer Odenwald (ehemals Schutzzone)' --KaiBorgeest 22:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 19:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altai wapiti with velvet horns an Karkaraly national park. Karaganda Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Marat Rysbekov --Красный 07:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:53, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altai wapiti with velvet horns an Karkaraly national park. Karaganda Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Marat Rysbekov --Красный 07:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:53, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pied Avocet - Thyna - Tunisia. --Skander zarrad 20:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 22:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper part of a gravestone in the oldest Jewish cemetery in Worms. By User:Englandfan~commonswiki --Augustgeyler 07:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 22:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tree pangolin (Phataginus tricuspis) --Charlesjsharp 07:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing Nectaring of Everes lacturnus (Godart, 1824) - Orange-crowned Cupid. By User:Sandipoutsider --Atudu 05:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Top of the wings are blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 06:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The silversmithing school in Stemnitsa, Arcadia, at dawn. --C messier 19:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    A bit noisy.Otherwise good --MB-one 20:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 231005 at Cardiff Central. --Suntooooth 18:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Question Am I right that you are the author of the image who uploaded it to flickr in the first place and later transferred it to Wikimedia – always under creative commons licence? --Augustgeyler 08:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
    The picture was uploaded to Flickr first then reuploaded to Commons by the same photographer, so it's eligible for QI. The picture's good but slightly tilted clockwise, verticals need to be straightened. ReneeWrites 08:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
    @ReneeWrites: When editing this photo, I used Photoshop's automatic straightening (in the raw image tools window) - I wonder if it just looks like it's not straight because of the angle. --Suntooooth 20:52, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
    It is definitely not straight, but tilted ccw. I suggest undoing this automatic function and redoing it by hand. --Augustgeyler 22:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done --Augustgeyler 22:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Abadía Neumünster, ciudad de Luxemburgo, Luxemburgo, 2023-12-17 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 10:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Such a nice shot. A bit noisy at the bottom (water surface), otherwise good. --MB-one 18:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 06:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Striped eel catfishes (Plotosus lineatus), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 10:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Contrast could be improved --MB-one 08:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 17:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The leaf beetle in monsoon. By User:Prasan Shrestha --Nirmal Dulal 05:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment Good image but undercategorized --MB-one 20:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
     Support --Georgfotoart 15:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Fisherman_at_Cape_zebib_rocky_beach_during_sunset.jpg

• Nomination Fisherman at Cape zebib rocky beach during sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 17:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, massively overprocessed smartphone picture with all textures lost due massive NR --ArildV 19:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Firstl , it's not overprocessed it's aritsic to edit it that way,Second ,overprocessed is not an objective term in photography for the most part of it , because some photographer tend to make light editing,some prefer heavy editing , and there's an absolute truth here ,third why you are hating so much on smartphone photos ? there's no no wrong with them ,they are evolved so much the last years,so they have enough quality to be in there , or maybe they're unallowed to use here ???? --Marwenwafi 22:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Nobody here hates phone cameras. QIC was introduced to encourage photographers to create photos that are technically suitable for educational purposes and to generally improve the quality of the photos used on wikipedia, which was often really lousy in the early days. The focus is therefore on minimising avoidable technical image errors and explicitly not on a wow factor that is difficult to define. That's what we have FPC for. Image composition or artistic aspects play a subordinate role here, it is primarily about the most realistic representation of the photographed motifs. This does not mean that images that look too messily composed are not sometimes rejected, even if they are technically flawless, and sometimes images with visible (unavoidable) technical flaws are also honoured if the conditions during shooting were difficult. But if rocks look like they have been covered with plastic film, then this is an avoidable technical error according to the QIC rules. --Smial 10:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Smartphone pictures are allowed here, but still they must be quality images. Smartphone cameras have evolved, so under some conditions, you can take a quality image with a smartphone. In any case, this image has poor quality, there is no detail, all the surfaces are softend and it looks more like a painting. Whether the reason for this is the smartphone camera or intentional artistic processing doesn't matter. Btw, with "overprocessed" we usually refer to heavy denoising + sharpening (often done by smartphone software) that creates pictures with little detail, halos around objects etc. --Plozessor 03:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed by the smartphone's software. Sorry, but for me, the sea and the rocks look a bit like plasticine --Jakubhal 05:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment I could imagine that the extremely red is not the real color of the countryside. -- Spurzem 15:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 09:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Cape_zebib_rocky_beach_during_cloudy_sunset.jpg

• Nomination Cape zebib rocky beach during cloudy sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 17:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, massively overprocessed smartphone picture with all textures lost due massive NR --ArildV 19:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Firstl , it's not overprocessed it's aritsic to edit it that way,Second ,overprocessed is not an objective term in photography for the most part of it , because some photographer tend to make light editing,some prefer heavy editing , and there's an absolute truth here ,third why you are hating so much on smartphone photos ? there's no no wrong with them ,they are evolved so much the last years,so they have enough quality to be in there , or maybe they're unallowed to use here ???? --Marwenwafi 22:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose See my previous comment, opposing this not because it's a smartphone picture but because it has poor quality. However, the reason for the poor quality might be that it's a smartphone picture. --Plozessor 03:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed by the smartphone's software. Sorry, but for me, rocks look a bit like plasticine here --Jakubhal 05:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 06:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:A_couple_silhouette_at_Ras_jebel_beach_during_a_golden_sunset.jpg

• Nomination A couple silhouette at Ras jebel beach during a golden sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 17:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Blurry, halos etc.; Declining as Roberto9191's vote is invalid. --Plozessor 03:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Plozessor --Jakubhal 05:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Plozessor. --SHB2000 12:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 17:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:"les_grottes_de_Bizerte"_during_blue_hour.jpg

• Nomination "les grottes de Bizerte" during blue hourI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 17:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Tilted, overexposed imo. --ArildV 19:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose This one is not so bad, but still, it is tilted. Also, there are some strange colorful artifacts on the edge of the sea on the left --Jakubhal 05:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 06:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Seascape_at_"les_grottes_de_Bizerte"_during_a_cloudy_sunset.jpg

• Nomination Seascape at "les grottes de Bizerte" during a cloudy sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 17:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, massively overprocessed smartphone picture with all textures lost due massive NR --ArildV 19:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Firstl , it's not overprocessed it's aritsic to edit it that way,Second ,overprocessed is not an objective term in photography for the most part of it , because some photographer tend to make light editing,some prefer heavy editing , and there's an absolute truth here ,third why you are hating so much on smartphone photos ? there's no no wrong with them ,they are evolved so much the last years,so they have enough quality to be in there , or maybe they're unallowed to use here ???? --Marwenwafi 22:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose I agree with ArildV - it's massively overprocessed, and there is a strong noise. Marwenwafi: There have been a lot of smartphone pictures promoted here lately, but in my opinion, it's more difficult to take a good-quality picture with one of those. Please keep in mind that this page is, among other things, about technical aspects of photography. You may make very nice artistic photographs, but they still might not fit here. --Jakubhal 05:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Low-contrast, low-detail, blurry picture. --Plozessor 10:11, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 17:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:2022-07-27_PLAT-I_in-stream_tidal_energy_platform_-_Westport,_NS_CAN.jpg

• Nomination PLAT-I horizontal, in-stream tidal energy generator --GRDN711 16:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 17:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
• Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:18, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Good quality but cw tilt. --ArildV 19:18, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tilted, lack of proper categorization. --Plozessor 06:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support now that tilt has been fixed. --Plozessor 14:47, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Added a correction for the perception of a cw tilt and tuned tones slightly. IMO this latest version is better.
  

@Plozessor: Your comment on lacking proper categorization needs more detail so that I can correct the deficiency. The image is currently categorized as a Category:Tidal stream generators which fits the device. It is further described in more detail in the image description and as one of many of this type in the Wikipedia topic - "Development of tidal stream generators". What more categorization would you add? --GRDN711 13:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

I'd add at least a category for the location, probably "Westport, Nova Scotia". Maybe also "July 2022 in Nova Scotia". --Plozessor 14:47, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done --GRDN711 20:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Thank you. QI now imo.--ArildV 21:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --August Geyler (talk) 21:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Chico_4th_of_July_Parade_2024-104A2396.jpg

• Nomination Participants of the 4th of July Parade 2024 in Chico, California, on the corner of 3rd and Main Street --Frank Schulenburg 17:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment I'm afraid that the head at the bottom right corner spoilts the image. --Poco a poco 18:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  

•  Comment I'm super happy I could integrate it and I'd also have an additional image with a waving hand in the foreground. --Frank Schulenburg 18:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  

•  Support Good quality and nice composition that captures the holiday spirit. The head is a point only at first glance, but after some reflection it is a plus. For one thing, it adds a little more depth and, from a photojournalistic point of view, conveys the lively participation in the festivities. --Radomianin 19:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  

•  Oppose I'm sorry, but I disagree with you here, please, let's see what other reviewers think --Poco a poco 06:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Sorry but the head seems really disturbing to me. Also DoF seems not ideal, IMO it would look better if the front of the car was also sharp, but this is a matter of taste and I would not decline it for that. --Plozessor 10:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 17:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Carl_Wilhelm_Ferdinand_Herzog_von_Braunschweig.jpg

• Nomination The Duke of Brunswick Carl Wilhelm Ferdinand in front of Brunswick Castle, Lower Saxony --JoachimKohler-HB 08:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Verticals should be corrected. --Ermell 10:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Done Better now? --JoachimKohler-HB 14:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Info Something went wrong here with editing the status here. Changed to discuss. --Augustgeyler 07:47, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 16:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Georgfotoart 19:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 19:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Ichkeul_mountain_at_sunset_captured_from_Bizerte_lake.jpg

• Nomination Ichkeul mountain at sunset captured from Bizerte lakeI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 16:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Strong oppose Extremely overprocessed --Jakubhal 05:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jakubhal. --Plozessor 06:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 06:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:El_Garia-Metline_lake_during_sunset.jpg

• Nomination El Garia-Metline lake during sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 16:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Strong chromatic aberration in the middle of the picture, overprocessed --Jakubhal 05:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jakubhal. --Plozessor 06:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 06:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Fisherman_at_Cape_zebib_rocky_beach_during_cloudy_weather.jpg

• Nomination Fisherman at Cape zebib rocky beach during cloudy weatherI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Sorry, massively overprocessed smartphone picture with all textures lost due massive NR --Plozessor 04:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Firstl , it's not overprocessed it's aritsic to edit it that way,Second ,overprocessed is not an objective term in photography for the most part of it , because some photographer tend to make light editing,some prefer heavy editing , and there's an absolute truth here ,third why you are hating so much on smartphone photos ? there's no no wrong with them ,they are evolved so much the last years,so they have enough quality to be in there , or maybe they're unallowed to use here ???? --Marwenwafi 22:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment I did not decline it because it was taken with a smartphone (actually I have a few own QI taken with smartphones), but because the quality is poor. There are hardly any details, everything is soft and blurry. "Some photographer" might "prefer heavy editing", but QI is not a place for heavily edited images. "Unnecessary or inappropriate use of artistic filters and effects" is considered a defect per QI guidelines. --Plozessor 06:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment I also have a few QI taken with smartphones, one even from 2016. And I also have some long exposure QI of the sea (for example 1 and 2 or 3). A long exposure does not automatically mean that you lose colors, details or sharpness.--ArildV (talk) 21:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Plozessor. Well composed scene. But it is  Overprocessed and lacks detail. --Augustgeyler 07:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 07:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:A_bird_flying_during_Colorful_sunset_at_Cape_zebib_beach.jpg

• Nomination A bird flying during Colorful sunset at Cape zebib beachI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 16:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too soft and noisy --Jakubhal 05:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jakubhal. --Plozessor 06:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jakubhal. --Augustgeyler 07:47, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 07:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:People_looking_into_a_Kayak_at_Cap_zbib_rocky_beach_during_a_warm_sunset.jpg

• Nomination People looking into a Kayak at Cap zbib rocky beach during a warm sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 16:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Massively overprocessed, strongly sharpened people in the foreground on the background that looks more like a painting than a photograph --Jakubhal 05:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jakubhal. --Plozessor 06:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 07:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Longhorn_beetle_(Cerambycidae_sp.)_Nyamebe_Bepo.jpg

• Nomination Longhorn beetle (Cerambycidae sp.) --Charlesjsharp 07:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 22:13, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose ID insufficient. The genus should be known at least. In addition, categorization is bad. Category:Unidentified Cerambycidae should be used rather than Category:Cerambycidae for this unidentified species --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:05, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Quality of the picture is good. Identification and categorisation is fixable --Luda.slominska 10:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

   Comment True, this is (at least probably) fixable, just like dust spots, CAs, bad crops ... Should we ignore these as well, just because they might be fixable? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 17:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Ichkeul_mountain_during_a_Golden_sunset.jpg

• Nomination Ichkeul mountain during a Golden sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 16:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 17:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too soft, sorry --Jakubhal 05:47, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good composition but technically quite poor. --Plozessor 06:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 07:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Warm_sunset_at_Cape_zebib_beach.jpg

• Nomination Warm sunset at Cape zebib beachI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 18:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Roberto9191 17:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Overprocessed, noise, also a minor barrel distortion --Jakubhal 05:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jakubhal. --Plozessor 06:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 07:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:2023-10-29_MAG_apparatus_finals_Pommel_horse_(Martin_Rulsch)_062.jpg

• Nomination Pommel horse exercise during the MAG apparatus finals at the Wase Gymcup 2023 in Melsele 2023. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 08:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose I really don't understand your votes. This picture is completly noisy and you oppose very sharp picture, serriously ? --Sebring12Hrs 11:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Thank you for reviewing. I really have no problem with anyone finding issues in nominations I make. I can learn something from it. I ask for more reviews only because your review sounds a bit emotional and I would like to hear more opinions. About your critics: Level of noise and sharpness have to be judged in correlation to subject and situation. Here we have an interior low light situation combined with very fast action. Here I would judge noise levels very different from static scenes with more available light. --Augustgeyler 07:47, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Hello, no probblem, you are right about the light and noise, and the speed of the subject. Sorry if I was too aggressive. --Sebring12Hrs 10:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• @Sebring12Hrs: I am fine. Your are doing a really good job by competently reviewing so many nominations here. Thank you for all that effort!
  To this case here: I think you are right because nobody else did say something different so far. --Augustgeyler 18:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 19:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_Intergeneratives_Zentrum_"einsA"_--_2024_--_0157.jpg

• Nomination Intergenerational center “einsA” in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blown highlights and too noisy. Sorry. --Ermell 05:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Done I made some improvements. Hopefully good enough now. Thank you. --XRay 12:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment The highlights are still blown. --Ermell 21:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support It seems to me that these highlights look absolutely natural for picture taken in the morning and there's no need to do something with it. -- Екатерина Борисова 22:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 06:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Barmhartigheid,_Hooge_Zwaluwe_1.jpg

• Nomination Statue "Barmhartigheid" (Mercy) in Hooge Zwaluwe --ReneeWrites 05:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Level of detail too low and not sharp enough. --Augustgeyler 08:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Image: Barmhartigheid, Hooge Zwaluwe 2 - much better --Georgfotoart 19:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 19:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)