Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 07 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Hwaseong_Fortress_04.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Chemin de ronde in Hwaseong Fortress, South Korea --Bgag 00:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Seems to need perspective correction, concluding from the high-rise buildings in the background --Plozessor 03:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Bgag 14:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok now! --Plozessor 15:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very good composition. But the sky is  Overexposed and the level of sharpness and detail is borderline. --Augustgeyler 08:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose The overexposed sky makes the composition look bad. Pity about that. --Radomianin 19:02, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 22:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Oriental_Shorthair_Kitten.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Oriental Shorthair kitten --Felinlove 19:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, part of the subject is out of focus. That could me acceptable in my opinion for an animal shot in nature, but not for an animal posing in a flat. --Benjism89 21:29, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Question - Could you please clarify which part of the object is out of focus and why you think so? --Felinlove 00:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
  • @Felinlove: If you disagree then this should be moved to discussion. IMO the cat's belly is OOF and in general the whole picture is not perfectly sharp, thus
  •  Weak oppose from my side. --Plozessor 04:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose per above. --SHB2000 04:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 07:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Lábrido_(Coris_gaimard),_Anilao,_Filipinas,_2023-08-23,_DD_67.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Variable bushy feather star (Coris gaimard), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 06:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Not in focus, sorry --ReneeWrites 09:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I disagree, may I ask for further opinions? --Poco a poco 19:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support The eye and the head are not pin sharp but quite tolerable.--Ermell 10:13, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Per Ermell. --Plozessor 04:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 07:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Ponta_da_Espalamaca3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ponta da Espalamaca seen from the Pico-Faial ferry, Azores. --The Cosmonaut 02:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Is is a nice scene. But the left part is completely unsharp. And the general level of detail and sharpness is quite low. --Augustgeyler 07:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per August.--Ermell 10:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Borderline, but with the unsharp left part just under the bar IMO. --Plozessor 04:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 07:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Plac_Powstańców_Styczniowych,_Sosnowiec,_Akcja_rozdawania_plakatów_Sosnowca_przez_Towarzystwo_Przyjaciół_Sosnowca,_22_czerwiec_2024_227.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The campaign of handing out posters of Sosnowiec by the Society of Friends of Sosnowiec at Powstańców Styczniowych Square in Sosnowiec, June 22, 2024 --KrzysztofPoplawski 10:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The verticals must be corrected. --Ermell 05:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support It is a proper used wide-angle lens with some lens distortion. The verticals are mostly good. So I think they could be improved a little, but the image is already QI due to smallness of that issue. --August Geyler (talk) 07:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support per Augustgeyler. --Smial 09:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support QI in my eyes. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 07:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Nebbia_su_colli_e_monti_-_Foreste_Casentinesi_-_Appennino_Tosco_Emiliano_-_GT_01_-_2024_01_28.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Advection fog on hills and the Italian Apenninesː Casentino Forest National Park. --Terragio67 19:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:52, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice in the preview. But I'm not shure, if  Level of detail too low meets the criteria. Please discuss. --Milseburg 09:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support LoD seems acceptable, given the high resolution. --Plozessor 15:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support sharp enough regarding the rather high resolution. Nice scene, composition, and lighting. --Smial 23:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Smial.--Tournasol7 15:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose per Milseburg. --Augustgeyler 11:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --August Geyler (talk) 22:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

File:S8_zwischen_Geisenbrunn_und_Gilching-Argelsried_03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: A train of the Munich S8 line between the stops of Geisenbrunn and Gilching-Argelsried going towards Herrsching passing through LSG Steinberg --Kritzolina 16:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The bridge pier should be vertical. --Ermell 19:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Info Moved to CR. --Augustgeyler 07:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Per Ermell. --Plozessor 16:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO good enough without trying to fix the perspective. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Overexposed, and the trees on right side are blurry a bit, but I think it can be fixed. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 07:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)