Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 06 2018
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Nature reserve “Breites Wasser”, Osterholz-Scharmbeck, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clock at St. Stephen's Cathedral, Vienna, Austria --XRay 03:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eastern view of Hans-Gasser-Platz, Villach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hanns Gasser monument on Hanns-Gasser-Platz, Villach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bronze sculpture of a firefighter on Hans-Gasser-Platz, Villach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former main fire station on Hans Gasser Platz #5, Perau, Villach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, nice & pretty --Podzemnik 02:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former main fire station on Hans Gasser Platz #5, Perau, Villach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, nice colours --Podzemnik 02:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A small island off the coast of East Sooke Regional Park, British Columbia --Podzemnik 01:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Gorgeous! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A view to the East from Iron Mine Bay Beach, East Sooke Regional Park, British Columbia --Podzemnik 01:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Simply great! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anderson Cove Trail, East Sooke Regional Park, British Columbia, Canada --Podzemnik 01:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 750 Pandora Ave, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada --Podzemnik 01:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cabin point, Coastal Trail, East Sooke Regional Park, British Columbia --Podzemnik 01:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset in Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 21:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Insanely good --Podzemnik 02:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chugach State Park, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 21:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 21:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, I love the sky colours --Podzemnik 02:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 21:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 21:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porsche 550 A Spyder from 1956 -- Spurzem 19:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Fine! --Palauenc05 22:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Église "Saint-Martin" in Pollestres, Pyrénées-Orientales, France. --Palauenc05 18:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 19:15, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mien Ruys Gardens. Hemerocallis. 'Margaret Perry'.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 17:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Mien Ruys Gardens. Hemerocallis. 'Margaret Perry'.
-
- Nomination The head of a Striated Heron (Butorides striata). --GerifalteDelSabana 15:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 17:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The head of a Striated Heron (Butorides striata). --GerifalteDelSabana 15:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 22:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The head of a Striated Heron (Butorides striata). --GerifalteDelSabana 15:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Striated Heron (Butorides striata) gripping a metal fence. --GerifalteDelSabana 15:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The head of a Striated Heron (Butorides striata). --GerifalteDelSabana 15:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rotonda de Los Camellos, Uga, Yaiza municipality, Lanzarote --Llez 14:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok for me. --Olivier LPB 14:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Constructions sur l' Île-de-Bréhat Côtes-d'Armor.--Pierre André Leclercq 08:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. May be a little bit too dark. --XRay 10:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cephonodes picus - Dorsal side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 08:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 10:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cephonodes picus - △ Ventral side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 08:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 10:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cephonodes banksi - Dorsal side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 08:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 10:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cephonodes banksi - △ Ventral side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 08:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Pierre André Leclercq 08:56, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cechenena lineosa - Ventral side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 08:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Pierre André Leclercq 08:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deutschland, Wiesbaden, Hessisches Staatstheater --Berthold Werner 06:50, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Restaurant Altstadthof in Sesslach --Ermell 06:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Viticulture northeast of Uga, municipality of Yaiza, La Geria, Lanzarote --Llez 05:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lava field (ʻAʻā lava) near the Centro de Visitantes e Interpretación de Mancha Blanca, Timanfaya National Park, Lanzarote --Llez 05:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Miramar Peninsula from Wellington Harbour, North Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 05:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Château de Réghaud in Sénezergues, Cantal, France. --Tournasol7 05:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rue du Pont de Tresque in Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:12, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Courtain wall of the castle of Castelnaud, Dordogne, France. --Tournasol7 05:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Victoria Street and Sky Tower in Auckland, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 05:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mien Ruys Gardens. Monarda 'Jacob Cline'. (bergamotplant).
--Famberhorst 04:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Mien Ruys Gardens. Monarda 'Jacob Cline'. (bergamotplant).
-
- Nomination Diemen. Residential tower 6 at the Berkenplein.
--Famberhorst 04:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 05:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Diemen. Residential tower 6 at the Berkenplein.
-
- Nomination Rosa 'Topolina'. Flower buds and flower.
--Famberhorst 04:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 05:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Rosa 'Topolina'. Flower buds and flower.
-
- Nomination Georg Pazderski (AfD) --Sandro Halank 15:59, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Olivier LPB 14:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Château Frontenac --The Photographer 02:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Flowers at St. John's Monastery, Stade, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 01:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Nature reserve “Torfkanal and Randmoore”, Osterholz-Scharmbeck, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 01:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Coney Island Mermaid Parade in June 2018 --Rhododendrites 00:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Casa Milà in Barcelona, Spain. --A,Ocram 16:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Review
I think the image needs a bit more work like trying to put down the highlights, make the verticals right and possibly crop to get rid of the lamp, I don't think it should be in the picture --Podzemnik 02:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larstind seen from the ridge of Larseggen. --Frankemann 17:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Photo could have been sharper. Tripod used? Good enough for me.--Famberhorst 05:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chugach State Park, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 17:36, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. But noise reduction in the sky could be better. --XRay 19:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Oskar Stachnik, discus thrower and shot putter --Isiwal 16:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Review Comment Good quality for a sports shot like this. But looks to be tilted a little CW? IMO some of the left side could be cropped out to focus on the action, but that decision probably isn't necessary for QI (the tilt should be corrected though). Rhododendrites 04:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Donethanks for review --Isiwal 07:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
It does still look a little tilted to me (the guy in the background to the left looks to be leaning, along with most of the verticals). May need perspective adjustment beyond rotation. I'm going to defer to another reviewer for this one -- maybe it's in my head :) Rhododendrites 05:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
CommentThe sole reference in this picture is the (imo) horizontal throwing circle. There are no verticals, the poles of the safety guard were erected temporarily without respect to verticals. A horizontal shot of about 60m with 300mm prime lens does not produce any perspective distortions. Feel free to decline, it doesn´t matter. --Isiwal
-
- Nomination Bus in Rouen --Billy69150 12:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 19:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le Saint-Pierre de Petit Bateau, cuit meunière, bouillon à la pomme Granny Smith, chartreuse, tagette et shiso, courgette et oignon nouveau grillés, Maison Pic, Valence. --Benoît Prieur 11:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Insufficient quality. Space at the top should be the same as the space at the bottom, details missing, JPEG artifacts. --XRay 19:26, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flowers of Yard Long BeanI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Sanu N 09:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Just beautiful enough --Daniel Case 04:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hot air balloon and moon in the sky above SpeyerI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Kmtextor --Shizhao 07:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Decline User:Kmtextor, could you de-noise the sky slightly? This composition is excellent, so if you can improve the quality of the picture, not only would it pass QIC, but it might also be a good FP nominee. But first things first. -- Ikan Kekek 08:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Not done in nine days --Daniel Case 04:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vejjayanta Chariot, BKK National Museum --Supanut Arunoprayote 05:58, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not really sharp; sharp highlights in back don't help --Daniel Case 04:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Phra Phuttha Sihing in Wat Ratchapradit, BKK --Supanut Arunoprayote 05:58, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose A lot of unsharp areas in the background --Daniel Case 04:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Icône de Nicolas-le-Thaumaturge du XVIIe siècle, dans la cathédrale Saint Basile le Bienheureux de Moscou.--Pierre André Leclercq 09:27, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Oppose Unsharp --Daniel Case 00:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination, Thank you for your advice. --Pierre André Leclercq 09:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Atlantes du portique du Nouvel Hermitage in Saint-Pétersbourg, Russie.--Pierre André Leclercq 09:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Oppose Some CA, figures are distorted and underexposed --Daniel Case 00:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination, Thank you for your advice. --Pierre André Leclercq 09:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mushrooms in Bad Nauheim --Hydro 08:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Quality is good but you'll have to identify those fungi --Poco a poco 09:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Not done in eight days --Daniel Case 05:41, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
CommentCan the quality really depend on the name? I'm not a mycologist. --Hydro 08:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC) @Hydro: As Poco said, the quality of the photo is not the issue; the technical quality is fine. On Commons, however, there are criteria for reaching "Quality Image" status, and those criteria include having a good description and categorization. For flora and fauna, that includes species (or in some instances at least the genus) identification. To reach QI status, an image of fungi should have this in the description and category (and possibly file name). If you manage to get some ID on the fungus, you can re-nominate it for QI.--Peulle 10:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Main_en_medis.jpg
[edit]- Nomination main en medisI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --BenOthmanZied 16:31, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Med mhamdi 15:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Confused composition, the background clashes with the object in the f/g and supporter lacks eligibilityt o review. --Rodhullandemu 17:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rodhullandemu. --Basotxerri 07:59, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose --GPSLeo 14:51, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose The image itself isn't too bad, but there's no suitable category.--Peulle 15:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose No QI for me. --Fischer.H 17:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rod, especially his first point. --GerifalteDelSabana 07:00, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined --Basotxerri 15:28, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Flower_vibes.jpg
[edit]- Nomination lovely flowerI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Safsoufa.s 16:27, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Med mhamdi 15:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Crpped too tighly; we need to focus on the stamen OR see the whole flower and supporter lacks eligibility to review. --Rodhullandemu 17:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Tight crop. --Basotxerri 08:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rodhullandemu--Peulle 15:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Daniel Case 21:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Could have been a good shot, but per others. --GerifalteDelSabana 06:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Basotxerri 15:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Amandier_tamzert.jpg
[edit]- Nomination La saison de la fleuraison des amandiers au sud tunisienI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Mahres 15:26, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support quality. --Med mhamdi 15:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Supporter lacks eligibility to review --Rodhullandemu 17:43, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Okay image, but flower should be identified. Hiàn 19:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Weak support English description would be nice. --GPSLeo 14:41, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose for a QI, I want the species in category.--Peulle 15:01, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Rod and Hian. --GerifalteDelSabana 06:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Basotxerri 15:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Pitcha.jpg
[edit]- Nomination no cat no lifeI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Omar challouf 15:22, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Med mhamdi 15:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Nowhere near sharp enough at 100% and don't think it should have a watermark. Also, supporter lacks eligibility to review. --Rodhullandemu 17:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Watermark removed, but sharpening has posterized the image. In any case, there's too much darkness to make this an appealing image.Rodhullandemu 06:30, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - Unsharp, etc. -- Ikan Kekek 07:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is far below the requested level here -- Basile Morin 02:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurred and artifacts. --GPSLeo 14:37, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Not even close.--Peulle 14:54, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. -- GerifalteDelSabana 01:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Impressing lighting and composition, but nothing sharp, and strong noise. --Smial 10:08, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Declined --Basotxerri 15:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Sousse-360---25-03-2017.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Sousse city center --Khwissem 16:19, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose null --Med mhamdi 15:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)- Support Good quality. --Med mhamdi 15:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Insufficient quality; is this a stitched image? But even if it's a swept pano, it suffers from perspective distortion, and supporter lacks eligibility to review. --Rodhullandemu 17:31, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective, unsharp, CAs, oversaturated, compression artifacts. --Basotxerri 11:51, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Compression or ISO artifacts. --GPSLeo 14:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Peulle 14:56, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per others, especially Basotxerri. --GerifalteDelSabana 06:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined --Basotxerri 15:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Port_of_Sousse.jpg
[edit]- Nomination sousse port by nightI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Med mhamdi 15:18, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Med mhamdi 15:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)- Oppose Nowhere near sharp enough at full resolution and supporter lacks eligibility to review. --Rodhullandemu 17:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC))
- Oppose Blurred -- George Chernilevsky 19:38, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per others and: you cannot review your own work. --Basotxerri 20:26, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose --GPSLeo 14:34, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose No.--Peulle 14:57, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --GerifalteDelSabana 06:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined --Basotxerri 15:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Passer_montanus_at_KL_(2).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Two Eurasian tree sparrows (Passer montanus). --GerifalteDelSabana 06:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Excellent. This one is a possible FP, IMO. Someone might object to what's in the upper left corner, I guess, but excellent, cute closeup of the two sparrows. -- Ikan Kekek 07:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Strong posterization, blurred legs, some detail are lost --George Chernilevsky 18:51, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The issue has been addressed at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passer montanus at KL (2).jpg. GerifalteDelSabana 11:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
WeakSupport. Sharpness and DOF not absolutely perfect, but in opposition to the image of the dove (below) I can not see disturbing overprocessing, and the image appears not to be scaled down. I wouldn't have cropped as tight, but that's matter of taste, no reason to decline. Very good lighting, and still acceptable composition. This is not an "easy-to-take-image". --Smial 13:58, 30 June 2018 (UTC)- Support Good image now that it has been fixed.--Peulle 15:41, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support Great Moment. --GPSLeo 14:33, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support - Basile Morin 12:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Basotxerri 15:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)