Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 23 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Münster,_Domplatz,_Wochenmarkt_--_2019_--_2646.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Market in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 11:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn
     Oppose I don't know if this is art, but it doesn't meet the QI guidelines. --Stepro 21:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
     Question - Stepro, to which guidelines do you refer? Is it this one? "Images should not be unintentionally tilted." This is clearly intentionally tilted. It seems to me, the rest of the guidelines which might address this kind of composition are open to interpretation, but I'd very much like to hear your view and particularly which specific guidelines you consider this image to violate, before I vote. I've reset this to "Discuss", so that it isn't declined before we can have a discussion about the QI guidelines. Thanks a lot in advance. -- Ikan Kekek 02:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion the following points are affected: Undefined focus, Insufficient depth of field, Unbalanced composition, perspective. That's why I wrote "I don't know if this is art" - maybe this is intended. But even than it's not an QI for me. --Stepro 15:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - Thanks a lot for laying those points out. I think it's clear where the focus is: One honey is sharp. However, I don't feel strongly that that would make this a QI, and I think you may be right, so I am choosing not to vote. -- Ikan Kekek 00:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 13:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:IglesiaDolores-PortoAlegre.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Our Lady of Sorrows church, Porto Alegre, Brazil --Ezarate 21:01, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Dorieo 08:07, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Perspective correction needed. --Tournasol7 15:36, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Fixed --Ezarate 00:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The verticals aren't straight. If you fix it correctly, it's likely that you'll loose part of the towers. --Basotxerri 09:46, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Basotxerri,--Fischer.H 17:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)