Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 23 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Western massasauga rattlesnake.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination: Western massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus tergeminus), photographed in northeast Oklahoma (by User:Goody0033). ArionEstar 15:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose Lacks DOF, still a good shot --Poco a poco 20:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
    •  Support I disagree, DOF is ok for such a close-up macro --Uoaei1 07:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per poco --The Photographer 13:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per poco--Lmbuga 20:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
  • weak  Support – not perfect but good enough IMHO --Kreuzschnabel 17:25, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Focus is not 100% perfect on the eye, but 98.842% is ok for QI. -- Smial 14:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Interesting to VI, but not QI.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support For me it is ok for QI -- Holleday 21:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)