Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 18 2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Reliefs at the left of the Sphinx Gate, Alaca Höyük, Turkey --Bgag 04:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Superbe qualité. --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lion Gate, Hattusa, Turkey --Bgag 04:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Peintnerhof at Niedergail #3, Liesing, Lesachtal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wetlands on Stony Brook. Jakec 01:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trash bin for the political party «A Just Russia». --PereslavlFoto 22:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion I dont think the focus is perfect, but good enough imo.--ArildV 22:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grey heron, Cologne Zoo, Germany. --Till.niermann 19:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. It could be enhanced by raising the magenta defringing amount. --Cccefalon 20:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chevrolet Pick-Up of 1954, Helsinki, Finnland --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good quality, fine view. --Dnalor 01 19:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Metropolitan Cathedral, Mexico City, México --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion QI imo.--ArildV 22:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Storks (Ciconia ciconia), Calatayud, Aragon, Spain --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion special.--Famberhorst 17:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Foundation deed of Rein abbey (facsimile) by Leopold the Strong of Styria, Abbey Bibliotheca of Rein abbey, Rein, Styria, Austria. --Dnalor 01 17:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support IMO acceptable, the edges are missing. (And the transcription.) --XRay 17:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View at the inner town over Ulický pond, Telč --Jiří Komárek 17:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok.--ArildV 22:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Upper gate, Telč --Jiří Komárek 17:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zacharias of Hradec Square, Telč --Jiří Komárek 17:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zacharias of Hradec Square, Telč --Jiří Komárek 17:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seed Box Echinacea purpurea (coneflower).
Famberhorst 16:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Seed Box Echinacea purpurea (coneflower).
-
- Nomination Lac du Glacier d'Arsine (2465 m.) Natural Phenomenon in Ecrins National Park, France.
Famberhorst 16:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Lac du Glacier d'Arsine (2465 m.) Natural Phenomenon in Ecrins National Park, France.
-
- Nomination Sphinx Gate, Hattusa, Turkey --Bgag 16:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sphinx Gate, Alaca Höyük, Turkey --Bgag 16:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 16:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Before Christmas at the MQ - Museumsquarter, Vienna --Hubertl 15:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Empress Elisabeth monument (Volksgarten) --Hubertl 15:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Bahnhofstraße Sitzendorf--NoRud 12:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle 1 --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Raising the darks would become to the foreground which is very shadowy --Cccefalon 16:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 23:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle 2 --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 11:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2nd school building in Ząbkowice Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 11:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gym in Ząbkowice Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--NoRud 13:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination PCAPH vs CERN CC - 20140911 - batting --Pleclown 09:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination PCAPH vs CERN CC - 20140911 - batting --Pleclown 09:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lenin's Park. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 08:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Botanical garden. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 08:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me --Bald white guy 10:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tawau, Sabah, Malaysia: Kindergarten of Basel Church Tawau (hint: The makeshift wooden adjacent constructions are not rectilinear in nature, please refer to the concrete structures of the kindergarten) --Cccefalon 08:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tenom, Sabah, Malaysia: District Office (Pejabat Daerah Beaufort) --Cccefalon 08:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Djurgårdsvarvet, a historic ship yard at Djurgården, Stockholm. --ArildV 08:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very sharp, perfect quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Canary Wharf. Mattbuck 07:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination South facade of Berlin main station as seen from Ludwig-Erhard-Ufer. --Code 07:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Italy, Paestum, Temple of Hera II (sometimes called the Temple of Neptune) --Berthold Werner 07:50, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pomatias elegans --Christian Ferrer 06:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LVM insurance in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Funny. Please wikilink your upload blurb. –Be..anyone 07:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lion Gate, Hattusa, Turkey --Bgag 04:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lion Gate, Hattusa, Turkey --Bgag 04:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motorship Klagenfurt meets motorship Kaernten on the Lake Woerth, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp --Uoaei1 07:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window shutter at the residential wing of the dukes` castle, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality after correction --Hubertl 12:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Renaissance portal in the south wall of castle Reideben, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Image needs perspective correction. The door and windows on the left leans inward. --Halavar 10:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC) * Comment uploaded new, perspective corrected version. --Hubertl 11:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Support Good now. --Halavar 12:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Weissenau at Reinfelsdorf, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Code 07:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud. --Medium69 00:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion I missed a deadline in the 1st run, sorry. –Be..anyone 07:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
No problem :)--Medium69 10:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Hallgrímskirkja . Jakec 21:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment The lower part of the photo is nice and sharp. However, an unfortunate picture composition, since half of the photo is made of gray sky. Can you repair? --Steindy 22:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Jakec 18:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Seems okay now. Good quality. --Steindy 21:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination View from Hallgrímskirkja . Jakec 21:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Hallgrímskirkja . Jakec 21:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment The lower part of the photo is nice and sharp. However, an unfortunate picture composition, since nearely half of the photo is made of gray sky. Can you repair? --Steindy 22:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Jakec 18:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Seems okay now. Good quality. --Steindy 21:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination View from Hallgrímskirkja . Jakec 21:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cethosia hypsea, Jardín Botánico de Múnich, Alemania --Poco a poco 21:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Fine. –Be..anyone 06:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ostrich (Struthio camelus), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 21:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Counting feathers… –Be..anyone 06:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Koudouni peak, Crete. --C messier 14:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Good but too much sky Poco a poco 21:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC) Done--C messier 14:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Koudouni peak, Crete. --C messier 14:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catedral de Gniezno, Polonia --Poco a poco 17:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good Quality --NoRud 18:18, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination le Parc_national_de_Bryce_Canyon, dans l' Utah (USA).--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion weak A little noisy and not very sharp, but IMHO just enough for QI. --C messier 16:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.)Botanical garden. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 17:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Check out 3256×3500 from the top of the tree to the bottom of the hedge, I think it works. –Be..anyone 01:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the hint. New version uploaded, hope it's better now. --Halavar 11:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Tnx. –Be..anyone 05:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St.-Peter-Kirche, Recklinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
The chromatic noise in the dark areas is so strong that the sky e.g. is red Poco a poco 19:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC) Fixed Sorry. Now it's better. Thanks. --XRay 17:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination St.-Peter-Kirche, Recklinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Autobus de Belfort --Billy69150 11:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status--Christian Ferrer 19:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
The author is a Wikimedian --Kvardek du 09:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Steindy 00:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka 2 --Jacek Halicki 22:40, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment IMO it is tilted CW.--XRay 17:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 20:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Support Good quality now. --XRay 17:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tramway d'Orléans --Billy69150 11:12, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status--Christian Ferrer 19:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
The author is a Wikimedian. --Kvardek du 09:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Steindy 00:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination TGV + Bus de Nîmes --Billy69150 11:12, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status--Christian Ferrer 19:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
The author is a Wikimedian. --Kvardek du 09:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Steindy 00:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus standard à Nice --Billy69150 11:12, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status--Christian Ferrer 19:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
The author is a Wikimedian. --Kvardek du 09:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Very good quality. --Steindy 00:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus articulé à Nice --Billy69150 11:12, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status--Christian Ferrer 19:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
The author is a Wikimedian. --Kvardek du 09:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Pourquoi pas. –Be..anyone 20:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bust of Andrew Maksimovich Chochua. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 11:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
The monument tilts slightly to the left. Also the photo could be a little bit darker. --Steindy 23:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Done New, fixed version uploaded with new crop. --Halavar 12:43, 12 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Steindy 00:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Bust of Andrew Maksimovich Chochua. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 11:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View of Brisbane City Cat ferry. --Bald white guy 03:03, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Pennsylvania Route 254. Jakec 02:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: County line sign. Jakec 02:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain' --Ram-Man 02:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Neunkirchen railwaystation. – Overhead installations train. --Steindy 01:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Neunkirchen railwaystation. – A Railjet with ÖBB 1116.230 encounters a double-deck at the station. In the foreground a two-way crane for overhead line installation. --Steindy 01:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
* Comment bitte leicht nach links drehen!--Hubertl 09:59, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
OK Done. --Steindy 21:08, 14 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support OK now. --Johann Jaritz 11:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Neunkirchen railwaystation. – A Railjet with ÖBB 1116.230 encounters a double-deck at the station. In the foreground a two-way crane for overhead line installation. --Steindy 01:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination P.Burgos Street in Batangas City, Philippines ----TagaSanPedroAko 05:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Remarkable cables. The fact that there's somebody who knows? Unfortunately, the perspective is completely distorted. --Steindy 01:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Heads of children in the Museo delle Terme di Diocleziano --Livioandronico2013 20:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sign for West Branch Fishing Creek. Jakec 14:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sugarloaf Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 14:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Moravian-Silesian Beskids in winter - mountain hut Na Kotaři --Pudelek 13:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review Good but shadows are a bit dark IMO --Christian Ferrer 16:46, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Carte des quartiers de Bayonne // Bayonne neighborhood map (in french) Kvardek du 12:34, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Site de Khong Island Phou Asa Mountain , Laos.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Temple Pha That Luang à Vientiane, Laos. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Berenschot's Watermolen, Winterswijk, Netherlands --XRay 05:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Hopefully they'll fix the wheel. –Be..anyone 23:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neunkirchen railwaystation. – Completion of the platform 1/2 and work on the overhead line. --Steindy 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Beadnell beach. Mattbuck 10:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review I was going to say "good composition" and it is a good composition, but the focus is too close to the camera (the man Kite) and the colors are not very nice, nor the out of focus background. Sorry, but I don't think it is a QI. --ArildV 21:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clock and bell at the Peter's Basilica, Vatican --XRay 04:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Outbuilding in Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Abbey 3 --Jacek Halicki 11:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 17:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Muse in Baths of Diocletian --Livioandronico2013 08:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Weak Oppose IMO too unsharp and DoF too small. --XRay 17:50, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kaisermantel - Argynnis paphia, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 16:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Question The body seems overexposed for me. --Steindy 23:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Fixed Not overexposed. Just too much brightness and maybe contrast. I reduced both. --Hockei 19:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Okay now. --Steindy 01:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Kaisermantel - Argynnis paphia, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 16:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windmills in Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 15:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment White balance needs adjusting. Daniel Case 04:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Better now? --NorbertNagel 19:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Ram-Man 03:10, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Planned community in Bonn, Germany (by Hasenläufer)--Leit 19:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Tilt needs fixing. Ram-Man 01:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC) - Decline Not done Ram-Man 13:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC) --Ram-Man 13:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Planned community in Bonn, Germany (by Hasenläufer)--Leit 19:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bubble under the Eiffel Tower, Paris. --Yann 23:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn * Comment Caution! The French have very strict copyrights protecting outdoor installations. --Jacek79 17:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC) I don't think there is anything to copyright here. These are just trees in a plastic bubble. Yann 00:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Perspective issues and general lack of sharpness due to high ISO. I'm not sure this is QI. Weak oppose Mattbuck 17:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Oppose For me not too --Livioandronico2013 21:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for review. Tripod was not an option here. Yann 16:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:MAN Lion's City Hybrid n°124 Reichel CTPM.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Autobus de Perpignan --Billy69150 15:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status.--Christian Ferrer 19:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
The author is a Wikimedian. --Kvardek du 09:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC)You must crop the top or clone out the disturbing cut thing at top --Christian Ferrer 11:52, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Done --Billy69150 15:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC) - Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --C messier 14:08, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
File:North Mountain near Ricketts Glen State Park 3.JPG
[edit]- Nomination North Mountain. Jakec 01:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose banding in the sky --Christian Ferrer 08:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
I thought it might be okay in this case since it's so slight that it's barely visible. Jakec 13:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Taking to CR per my previous comment. Jakec 21:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC) - Oppose Unbalanced noise reduction and sharpening -> overprocessed. --Smial 08:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Smial. chromatic aberration visible at left edge. --Kreuzschnabel 13:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --C messier 14:08, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Brushtail_Possum_IMG_5005.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Brushtail Possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) in Roma Street Parklands, Brisbane, Queensland. --Bald white guy 03:03, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose The face is slightly out of focus. --Ruthven 22:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Info Eyes in focus. Face is soft because large aperture and fast shutter speed (with shallow DoF) needed to capture normally nocturnal animal in low light before it moved. Other Brushtail possum images in commons shot using flash causing significant red-eye reflection. This approach with no flash and low DoF acceptable IMHO but depends on feedback --Bald white guy 08:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC) Oppose Only the nose is really sharp. --Steindy 15:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Support Okay now. --Steindy 01:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the review and update --Bald white guy 10:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)- Support Somewhat low DOF, but very nice composition, colors, and lighting which compensate the small drawbacks. Slight downscaling would help. -- Smial 16:27, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Downscaled slightly and sharpened. Hopefully it helps.Bald White guy 10:27, 14 January 2015 (UTC) - Comment EXIF data? Yann 21:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment Sorry Yann - my old version of Photoshop Elements strips the EXIF when exporting the RAW file to JPG. It's a pain. I probably should upgrade but baulked when I saw Adobe's new pay per month subscription model. Maybe I need to add it manually, although EXIF not essential for QI --Bald white guy 10:27, 14 January 2015 (UTC) - Support. Maybe "essential" (SHOULD) for some expert reviews, but not "required" (MUST). Hopefully I'll never need ExifTool. –Be..anyone 07:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support GQ. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --C messier 14:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen station (083).jpg
[edit]- Nomination A ÖBB Railjet with ÖBB 1116.224 passes through the Neunkirchen railwaystation. --Steindy 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Swell colour rendition, train and clouds. Perfect saturation. Very sharp. QI. The 1116 is a real beauty! --Johann Jaritz 04:55, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
- I don't like to intervene, Johann Jaritz, but an inevitable standard in QIC is, not to promote when there are visible chromatic aberrations. Also the poles should be rectilinear.. --Cccefalon 05:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Train poles rejuvenate from the bottom to the top, they also lean a bit to one side. Your arguments seem kind of pettifoggery. But well ... --Johann Jaritz 09:55, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
- Mein Punkt sind nicht die Masten, deswegen hätte ich nicht eingegriffen. Es geht um die CA; die habe ich auch beispielhaft annotiert. --Cccefalon 12:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Cccefalon couldn't you answer in english? @ Johann Jaritz, this CA will see only Cccefalon. It's just Cccefalons usual way with-pulled by the hair arguments to make my pictures bad. --Steindy 21:08, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, right... CA is pretty obvious and hardly made up. --DXR 22:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)- I don't have any hazzle with your photos, in fact I like the train series very much. But it must be allowed to point out a flaw without stirring up defamations and the allegation, that there is a personal reason towards you. It is not and never was. However, if you don't like my reviews, I won't waste my time for you in future. --Cccefalon 13:36, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Cccefalon, no you do not sacrifice your precious time for me. On your strange Opposes I can do without. And positive you anyway never rated a photo of me. You've always wanted only an opportunity to make my photos bad. --Steindy 21:49, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Why always so defensive? Why would anybody here care to bash somebody? There is no logical payoff whatsoever... If you think that the problems pointed out are irrelevant, you can try to get the rules changed to be softer on these problems. Fact is that apparently quite a few people see them to be a problem. QI is supposed to help us better understand these issues and avoid them. If you see critical comments as a personal affront, you miss the opportunity to learn from mistakes everybody made a few times before. --DXR 06:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Cccefalon, no you do not sacrifice your precious time for me. On your strange Opposes I can do without. And positive you anyway never rated a photo of me. You've always wanted only an opportunity to make my photos bad. --Steindy 21:49, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have any hazzle with your photos, in fact I like the train series very much. But it must be allowed to point out a flaw without stirring up defamations and the allegation, that there is a personal reason towards you. It is not and never was. However, if you don't like my reviews, I won't waste my time for you in future. --Cccefalon 13:36, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Cccefalon couldn't you answer in english? @ Johann Jaritz, this CA will see only Cccefalon. It's just Cccefalons usual way with-pulled by the hair arguments to make my pictures bad. --Steindy 21:08, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Mein Punkt sind nicht die Masten, deswegen hätte ich nicht eingegriffen. Es geht um die CA; die habe ich auch beispielhaft annotiert. --Cccefalon 12:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Train poles rejuvenate from the bottom to the top, they also lean a bit to one side. Your arguments seem kind of pettifoggery. But well ... --Johann Jaritz 09:55, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
- I don't like to intervene, Johann Jaritz, but an inevitable standard in QIC is, not to promote when there are visible chromatic aberrations. Also the poles should be rectilinear.. --Cccefalon 05:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Sides leaning (even visible on the building edge on the left), chromatic aberration in all the overhead structures. Magenta cast on clouds (unnatural colour). --Kreuzschnabel 06:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)New version acceptable. --Kreuzschnabel 09:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)- Comment Kreuzschnabel, what should I yet say after such a technical comments? Maybe a little help: overhead lines are known to be of copper (in Germany as well as in Austria and in many other countries around the world), copper is known to be reddish and this is particularly visible at the newly mounted overhead lines logically. Or maybe CAs are here to see? I can't for the red copper, also not for the colors of the sky. And oh yes, before I forget, when the photo is about the building and not the train. I've completely overlooked when photographed. The train just came in the way of me. Beg your pardon. About some solid-fetched comments I'm only wondering... --Steindy 21:49, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I’m always having a really good laugh reading your replies. Magenta copper? Building as a main subject when I only wrote it indicates the pic as a whole shows perspective distortion? Please go on, it’s too funny! Pity DXR uploaded a much worse version now, taking away all the copper. How is the train supposed to drive on? Anyway, Support I’m going to support this version, if you don’t mind, since the unavoidable shortcomings have miraculously disappeared now. --Kreuzschnabel 21:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Kreuzschnabel, what should I yet say after such a technical comments? Maybe a little help: overhead lines are known to be of copper (in Germany as well as in Austria and in many other countries around the world), copper is known to be reddish and this is particularly visible at the newly mounted overhead lines logically. Or maybe CAs are here to see? I can't for the red copper, also not for the colors of the sky. And oh yes, before I forget, when the photo is about the building and not the train. I've completely overlooked when photographed. The train just came in the way of me. Beg your pardon. About some solid-fetched comments I'm only wondering... --Steindy 21:49, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Steindy: QI for me, good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose CA visible without magnification. -- Smial 16:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I've uploaded a version with purple fringing correction (this is different from traditional CA BTW), feel free to revert. I wonder why it is this strong in the normal image. Was the image shot with a very large aperture? --DXR 10:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I have a scaled 24" HD-monitor and I see no CA and no purple fringing; not in the original and not in the cutted version. What I do not see or what is not there, I can not even correct. Sorry! It's not worth getting upset because of this pictures and comments. This reminds me of my nerves are too good. The criticans are right and I am wrong. I give up!!! Regards --Steindy 23:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Current version looks fine for me. --Uoaei1 07:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support as Uoaei1 --Hubertl 12:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment EXIF data? Yann 16:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Answer on your disc. --Steindy 22:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support New version properly adressed the issues. --Cccefalon 06:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --C messier 14:04, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
File:2014_Picunda,_Plaża_(20).jpg
[edit]- Nomination The beach. Pitsunda, Gagra District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 09:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose Overprocessed --Daniel Case 23:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Comment I don't understand what do you mean by using this word. You didn't explain. Also, you didn't tell me what I could fix here. We need others opinions. --Halavar 17:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I don't understand too --Livioandronico2013 20:38, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I do not think that over processed color--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support as above --Hubertl 11:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --C messier 14:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
File:2014_Picunda,_Plaża_(10).jpg
[edit]- Nomination The beach. Pitsunda, Gagra District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 09:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion OpposeOverprocessed --Daniel Case 23:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment I don't understand what do you mean by using this word. You didn't explain. Also, you didn't tell me what I could fix here. We need others opinions. --Halavar 17:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC) - Support I don't understand too --Livioandronico2013 20:39, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I do not think that over processed color,--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support as above --Hubertl 11:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --C messier 14:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen station (046).jpg
[edit]- Nomination A freighttrain with cars ppasses the Neunkirchen railwaystation. --Steindy 00:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC) * Comment please decrease the shadow areas in the front of the hauling engine--Hubertl 10:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Front brightened. --Steindy 23:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC) - Decline A little overexposed, some odd crops --Daniel Case 06:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
@ Daniel Case Strange. The one user, it is too dark and for you it's too overexposed? I do not know my way around. Other votes please. --Steindy 21:48, 9 January 2015 (UTC) - Oppose the cars on the train are burned out (overexposed) --Christian Ferrer 08:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment This has silver-gray wagons and the glass panes of the cars are like that. --Steindy 22:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Christian--Livioandronico2013 23:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose
All new copper cars, poles, and wires.CA, burnt areas. -- Smial 08:52, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --C messier 14:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen station (051).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen railwaystation: Sight to the north of the station. --Steindy 00:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Unsharp, poor DoF --Daniel Case 23:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment How much do you want by using a 300 mm tele? The distance to the railway sleepers is 60 cm, so that you can work it out. Other votes please. --Steindy 01:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support it´s though Ok for me.--Hubertl 09:19, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:53, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:27, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose unsharp --Christian Ferrer 17:04, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose It's not sharp enough for me too, sorry. --Hockei 14:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Christian Ferrer --Livioandronico2013 20:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing sharp in right half of frame. Of course you won’t get much DoF at this focal length but I think it was a mistake to put the focus on the near pole in the center, making everything farther blurry. --Kreuzschnabel 06:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, I'm too stupid to adjust the focus correctly. It also was not about to show the track prepared for installation pieces from the entire construction site. It is also not important what I thought at the photo, important is only what the critics say! If someone came up with the idea that I have tried to document the entire construction process? --Steindy 01:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Einer meiner Lehrer sagte immer: „Ein Foto, das eine Erklärung benötigt – und sei es nur ein Wort! –, ist kein gutes Foto. Ein gutes Foto spricht immer für sich selbst und vermittelt dem Betrachter die Absicht des Fotografen.“. --Kreuzschnabel 21:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, I'm too stupid to adjust the focus correctly. It also was not about to show the track prepared for installation pieces from the entire construction site. It is also not important what I thought at the photo, important is only what the critics say! If someone came up with the idea that I have tried to document the entire construction process? --Steindy 01:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment EXIF data? Yann 16:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Answer on your disc. --Steindy 22:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --C messier 14:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)