Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 13 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Trail at Silbersee III near Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ehrenfriedhof Haus Spital, Gievenbeck, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination National park ship “Feuerschiff Borkumriff”, Borkum, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lamberti fountain on Lambertikirchplatz in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Weyer on Wayer Strasse, Sankt Veit an der Glen, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaques at the western exterior wall of castle Weyer on Wayer Strasse, Sankt Veit an der Glen, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inscription "1584" at the portal in the yard of castle Weyer on Wayer Strasse, Sankt Veit an der Glen, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal at the defunct drawbrige of castle Weyer on Wayer Strasse, Sankt Veit an der Glen, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arcades at the yard of castle Weyer on Wayer Strasse, Sankt Veit an der Glen, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade of the Chiesa di San Silvestro church. --Moroder 03:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination South facade of the Chiesa di San Silvestro. --Moroder 03:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Immaculate Conception, Filandia, Colombia --Bgag 00:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Immaculate Conception, Filandia, Colombia --Bgag 00:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Immaculate Conception, Filandia, Colombia --Bgag 00:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Akensgatan 1-Oskarsplatsen 5, Örebro --Liberaler Humanist 23:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 00:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine (1741) in Saarburg, Germany. --Palauenc05 16:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 75 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Gernrode, Thuringia --Palauenc05 16:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close-up view of the North Campus of the IIT Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India-175075 as seen from the Griffon Peak on Jan 2020 --ADARSHluck 16:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Nothing is sharp --Michielverbeek 19:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination Thanks --ADARSHluck 6:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Centaurea nervosa --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:08, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support A bit unbalanced (I'd crop a bit more on the left) but ok --Poco a poco 16:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forum Romanum (2018). By User:Rabax63 --Brackenheim 14:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Overcooked --Poco a poco 16:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Opel Vivaro A. By User:K.szadkowski --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fiat Ducato (2006) in police service. By User:K.szadkowski --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rue Philippe-II in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. --Tournasol7 10:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Apolda, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 10:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Side door of the St Florian church in Znin, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voiv., Poland. --Tournasol7 10:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Virgin Mary Queen of Poland church in Znin, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voiv., Poland. --Tournasol7 10:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The ruins of the 1410 church dedicated to Mary, located in Skouloufia, Crete. --C messier 10:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceiling of the Catholic parish church of St. Leonard in Zentbechhofen --Ermell 08:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in the cathedral in Basel --Ermell 08:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in the cathedral in Basel --Ermell 08:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in the cathedral in Basel --Ermell 08:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The former Wallaert spinning mill of the Fil au Louis d'Or (Gold Louis Thread), Jean Jaurès street, Lille, France --Velvet 08:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The former Wallaert spinning mill of the Fil au Louis d'Or (Gold Louis Thread), Jean Jaurès street, Lille, France --Velvet 08:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:08, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Machu Picchu, Peru --Poco a poco 07:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Llamas at Machu Picchu, Peru --Poco a poco 07:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Intihuatana, Machu Picchu, Peru --Poco a poco 07:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nazca Lines, Nazca, Peru --Poco a poco 07:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Continental Cup Eisenerz 2020. Picture shows Nathaniel Mah of Canada --Granada 06:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Continental Cup Eisenerz 2020. Picture shows Manuel Maierhofer of Italy --Granada 06:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Continental Cup Eisenerz 2020. Picture shows Fabio Obermeyr of Austria --Granada 06:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Continental Cup Eisenerz 2020. Picture shows Kodai Kimura of Japan --Granada 06:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Continental Cup Eisenerz 2020. Picture shows David Mach of Germany --Granada 06:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fomes fomentarius (tinder fungus) on a dead tree trunk. Location: Kroondomein Het Loo.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality -- Ikan Kekek 05:36, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Fomes fomentarius (tinder fungus) on a dead tree trunk. Location: Kroondomein Het Loo.
-
- Nomination Silvia market, Colombia --Bgag 04:36, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Viscera section, Silvia market, Colombia --Bgag 04:36, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaques at the boundary wall of the dukes` castle on Burggasse #9, Sankt Veit an der Glen, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. It looks like tilted. --XRay 04:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. I applied some improvement. —- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The sermon pulpit of Heilandskirche, Graz --Liberaler Humanist 23:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Asics Gel-Cumulus 22 --PetarM 22:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residenzhaus at Markt 9b in Eisenach, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 09:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Dust spots (3-4) on the left, near the building roof. --Jakubhal 13:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Done, Tournasol7 09:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Herderplatz 2 in Weimar, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 08:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beach of Cran au Poulet, Audinghen, Pas-de-Calais, France.--Pierre André Leclercq 22:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Insufficient quality. Not very sharp, sorry --Moroder 01:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I agree, Thanks for the advices.--Pierre André Leclercq 11:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Misurinasee-Nordufer, im Hintergrund die 3 Zinnen, Hochpustertal, Südtirol, Italien. --Fischer.H 17:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Very nice motif, but the clouds are looking very unnatural. Sharpness is borderline. Don't know, if it's fixible. --Milseburg 20:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 17:40, 9 January 2021 (UTC) Rabid method of completely replacing the sky. But then you have to work much cleaner around the edges. The halos shouldn't be there. Also because of the not quite convincing sharpness, I don't know whether it is worth putting so much work into the image. But what a pity about the fine motif. --Milseburg 20:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination --Fischer.H 09:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Blue button (Porpita porpita), Uthandi Beach Chennai, India. Central disk ~1.5cm dia. --Tagooty 15:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Island Cabildo of Tenerife, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 11:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion The quality is good but the tower seems to be clearly leaning up to the right. I think the right side is leaning in, too. -- Ikan Kekek 03:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Done --Poco a poco 09:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment Now it's more rectilinear, but it's smaller and a lot less sharp and hazier. The 3-dimensionality of everything is so much clearer in the previous version. What happened? -- Ikan Kekek 06:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
I had to do a new development due to logistical reasons --Poco a poco 11:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Question Could you possibly recover at least some of the previous sharpness and 3-dimensional clarity? -- Ikan Kekek 12:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Ok, new version uploaded based on the older one --Poco a poco 08:08, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Support Thanks, I appreciate it. Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 08:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Drinking fountain, Florence depicting heraldic fleur-de-lis. --Martinvl 18:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Looks tilted and quite soft --Podzemnik 01:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@Podzemnik: An optical illusion - I checked and the fountain is perfectly vertical but the mortar lines on the building are not at right angles to the fountain. Martinvl 17:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Drinking fountain, Florence depicting heraldic fleur-de-lis. --Martinvl 18:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arabic arch, Ágreda, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 12:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Burned sky with artifacts, quite blurred corners. --C messier 10:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Path_to_Lysá_hora_2021_09.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Path to Lysá hora mountain in Moravian-Silesian Beskids --T.Bednarz 08:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
I disagree - lot ot chromatic aberrations. --Granada 08:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC) - Comment I see what Granada is seeing. Please fix them. -- Ikan Kekek 08:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good for me -- Spurzem 09:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Lot of chromatic aberration --MIGORMCZ 16:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)- Done @Granada and MIGORMCZ: New version uploaded. --T.Bednarz (talk) 19:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support It is good now --MIGORMCZ (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support now. -- Ikan Kekek 22:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 23:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Domplatz_8_in_Wetzlar.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Building at Domplatz 8 in Wetzlar, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 08:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose I am sorry, but I don't think this is a QI of the building with the truck and all that people in front of it. Not your fault, though. --Poco a poco 13:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Quality is good enough. No problem with the people. --Ermell 16:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Ermell. This is a market. The people are part of the composition. -- Ikan Kekek 06:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Perhaps the description of the image should be changed or supplemented, for it shows a market in front of the building. But the picture is by no means bad, in contrast to some photos by some other users, which are classified as quality images. -- Spurzem 15:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I don't understand this comments. The QI shall depict the building in the Domplatz 8 but instead this in the first place show a market. Come on guys --Poco a poco 21:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It does show Domplatz 8. It also shows the market that's in front of it. What's the issue there? -- Ikan Kekek 00:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- The QI requirement under Composition and Lighting is the following (I added the cursives/bold text): "The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed." What didn't I get here? I have always been consistent rejecting QIs with e.g. disturbing tourists in front of it. Poco a poco 08:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- There are two subjects. -- Ikan Kekek 10:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- That's just your assumption. Neither the file name, nor the categories nor the description back that --Poco a poco 08:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- That's what I see. So maybe those should be changed, but the photo is IMO fine. Tournasol7, would you like to add the market to the categories and file description? -- Ikan Kekek 08:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done, Tournasol7 10:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Ermell.--Moroder 03:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 23:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Nottawasaga_Bluffs_Conservation_Area.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Nottawasaga Bluffs Conservation Area, Ontario, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 04:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- OpposeWhere is the focus? Unsharp. --̈Kallerna 07:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I think Kallerna's right. -- Ikan Kekek 08:51, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per Kallerna --Trougnouf 16:05, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --A.Savin 23:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Palacio_del_Louvre-Paris344.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Caïn venant de tuer son frère Abel statue and Louvre Palace, Paris, France --Poco a poco 11:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Small, CA, unsharp, noisy, cluttered composition. --Kallerna 21:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop and sharpness should be better. --XRay 07:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)~
- Oppose Per others. Poor cropping. --T.Bednarz 10:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I feel the composition and also the cropping of the image is not so bad, the photo is informative and very nicely lit. Unfortunately, sharpness and other technical quality are not enough, they are below standard. --Smial 13:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I'm surprised by how strong the negative reaction is to this photo. I like the composition with the sculpture in front and think declining the photo because of a marginal disagreement about the right crop would be too nitpicky. The sharpness could be better, mostly on the right but also in the near shadowed area of the Louvre, but when I read all the votes above, I thought it would be terrible, and instead, I think it's kind of borderline. I'm wondering if the sharpness could be improved a bit, so I could give a supporting vote. -- Ikan Kekek 20:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan. Nice composition --Moroder 01:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support OK for QI. --Aristeas 11:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Ikan and Moroder but would probably have cropped a bit differently although still QI for me --Scotch Mist 14:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good Quality --Fischer.H 09:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 23:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 23:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)