Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 06 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Kindlused Narva jõe kaldal.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Narva river (by Aleksander Kaasik). Kruusamägi 10:11, 26 December 2014 (UTC)*  Comment Tilted, please do the correction, it will be QI for me!--Hubertl 12:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose - Lacks fine detail. Mattbuck 15:39, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agreed. f/25 is just too small of an aperture. With diffraction, the effective resolution is much smaller. This should be downsampled, but even so, it's just too soft. Ram-Man 12:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose f/25 is a mistake. --Iifar 07:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --C messier 15:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Döbritz_Dorfkirche_Innenraum.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Interior of the church of Döbritz (Thuringia, Germany). --Code 16:40, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 15:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I see CA, overexposure, perspective issues. --Mattbuck 15:39, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
    •  Question @Mattbuck: Can you please leave notes where you see CAs? I can't find them. The perspective is good, I think. It looks strange but this is an old church and there are simply no parallel lines at all. The church is distorted, not the photo. --Code 18:32, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment New version uploaded, perspective distortions repaired, highligts reduced.--Hubertl 11:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
    • @Hubertl: Thank you once more! --Code 12:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Unfortunately, the axis does not fit exactly, but overall a good picture, and benefit from the subtle color nuances. --Steindy 12:31, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment Thank you. I'm still not sure whether there is a clear axis at all. The longer I look at the image the more I am confused. --Code 12:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
      •  Comment I give you a hint in the imagenotes. --Steindy 15:57, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
        •  Comment Excuse me for switching to German, but this is getting too complicated in English. @Steindy: Danke. Du hast Recht mit der Bank, die links vorhanden ist, aber rechts nicht. Ich frage mich nur, ob - wenn man die horizontale Ausrichtung entsprechend anpasst - das Bild nicht noch viel verzerrter wird. Denn die Stufe vor dem Altar scheint ja an sich horizontal zu sein, wenn ich mich nicht täusche. Vielleicht müsste man es auch ein paar Grad nach links drehen. Ich werde mich mal mit meinem antiken Photoshop Elements 10 dransetzen. --Code 16:08, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
          •  Comment Nein, das liegt schon in der Aufnahme. Wenn Du genau schaust sind auch die Lampen nicht in einer Flucht. Das passiert mir auch immer wieder, dass ich bei der Aufnahme glaube, dass alles parallel ist und danach feststelle dass dem nicht so ist. Für den schiefen Kasten auf der rechten Seite kannst du ja auch nichts. Aber der Qualität des Fotos tut dies ja keinen Abbruch. --Steindy 00:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 12:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Not perfect (highligths, softness) but good enough. Alvesgaspar 18:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 15:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Pékin Le temple du Ciel.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Le Temple_du_ciel, à Pékin .-Chine--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  SupportGood quality. --Hubertl 22:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment tilted CCW and perspective not done. --C messier 22:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Corrected perspective and tilting --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

The new file looks OK in the preview and the thumbnail, but in full view I'm looking to the old one. I will wait. --C messier 15:13, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:35, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 15:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Le Mékong à Phnom Penh (9).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Coucher du soleil sur le Mékong à Phnom Penh.- Cambodge--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:45, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Very strong noise in the dark areas. --Steindy 19:13, 26 December 2014 (UTC) ✓ Done I have reduce the very strong noise in the dark areas with "Gimp". range 4, level black 4.- Is it the good way? Thank--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:59, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
    Please third opinion after change. --Hubertl 12:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunately not. Sorry! --Steindy 18:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I love the town of Phnom Penh. But unfortunately not. Still Heavy noise and blurry in the dark areas of the tree. -- DerFussi 08:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 15:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Le Mékong à Phnom Penh (8).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination le soir tombant sur le Mékong à Phnom Penh.- Cambodge--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Very strong noise in the dark areas. --Steindy 19:13, 26 December 2014 (UTC) ✓ Done I made a lightening shadow areas and improved filtering.- Thank--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)*  Comment third opinion after new version.--Hubertl 12:55, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunately not. Sorry! --Steindy 18:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as the Phnom Penh foto above. Sorry. -- DerFussi 08:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 15:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Ferlach_Bodental_Bodenbauer_16102013_964.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bodenbauer (slow. Podnar) in Bodental slow. Poden, a side valley of the Loibl valley in the Karawanken, municipality Ferlach, district Klagenfurt Land, Carinthia / Austria / EU by Johann Jaritz
    --Hubertl 06:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Oppose nice place and colors but the overexposed clipped areas on the house are for me an issue, sorry. For info CAs top left. --Christian Ferrer 07:58, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
    Discussion and more opinions --Hubertl 08:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me. --Steindy 01:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment The saturation needs to be reduced, but everything else is fine for me (exposure, CAs). Ram-Man 03:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Code 06:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Saturation reduced with new version. New review, Ram-Man --Hubertl 09:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Good. Very nice colors. Yann 01:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 15:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)