Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 05 2018

• 
  • Nomination Building at 28 Worcester Street (actually visitor centre) in Christchurch, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 03:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 04:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Belves, Dordogne, France. --Tournasol7 03:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 04:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the St. Kilian's Cathedral from Domstraße in Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 03:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 04:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rosa 'Madame Charles' in Dunedin Botanic Garden, Dunedin, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 03:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 04:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helianthus annuus --Vengolis 03:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helianthus annuus --Vengolis 03:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Phasmatodea --Vengolis 03:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tagiades litigiosa --Vengolis 03:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Delias eucharis --Vengolis 03:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parkhotel (seen from the Werzer beach), Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hibernating rambler roses with lantern on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fire station on Karlstrasse, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wrought iron fence on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Water slide tower at the lido on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Island, Öxarárfoss im Þingvellir Nationalpark --Ralf Roletschek 00:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tatra 815 4x4 Tatrabus in Island, Keflavik --Ralf Roletschek 00:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Whitehall City Hall Building Decorated for Christmas -- Sixflashphoto 00:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Whitehall Police Headquarters Decorated for Christmas -- Sixflashphoto 00:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Whitehall City Hall Building Decorated for Christmas -- Sixflashphoto 00:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Whitehall Police Headquarters -- Sixflashphoto 00:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion File desc says decorated for Christmas but I don't see any decorations. PumpkinSky 01:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
    It wasn't visible in the photo so I removed it from the description. Good catch. -- Sixflashphoto 01:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC) Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jefferson Township Fire Department Headquarters -- Sixflashphoto 00:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion The main subject is dark can you lighten it up? PumpkinSky 01:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
    How is that? -- Sixflashphoto 01:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC) Much better. OK now. PumpkinSky 02:01, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Virginia Beach Police HQ sign --PumpkinSky 00:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landstown High School South Wing --PumpkinSky 00:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landstown High School North Wing --PumpkinSky 00:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landstown High School Central Section --PumpkinSky 00:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landstown High School Main Entrance --PumpkinSky 00:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Help in Paczków --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wrocławska Gate in Paczków 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wrocławska Gate in Paczków 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wrocławska Gate in Paczków 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of "Église Saint-Félix de Calmeilles", France. --Palauenc05 19:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Granada 20:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mistletoe on apple tree --Manudouz 17:37, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry, but not sharp enough. --Sputniktilt 21:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A weaver bird nest under construction. Taken in Pilanesberg park, South Africa. --Prosthetic Head 16:12, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Granada 20:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue Lagoon - swimming pool in the effluent pools from a geothermal power plant. Faces of swimmers obscured for privacy. --Prosthetic Head 16:12, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A gull eating a large fish on rocks. --Prosthetic Head 14:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
     Oppose Must be identified though (at least the gull) --A.Savin 16:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the feedback A.Savin, Species now identified after some help --Prosthetic Head 17:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Thanks. --A.Savin 17:37, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baraona, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 14:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 16:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hermitage of St Saturio, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 14:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Perfect, and I talk not only by shadows or expose... --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 17:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fuencaliente del Burgo, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 14:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination La Riba de Escalote, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 14:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:35, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lumías, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 14:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Citroën 11 CV, 1956 --Berthold Werner 13:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Citroën 11 CV, 1956 --Berthold Werner 13:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) defending its prey caught at sunrise with the typical gesture of a raised beak and short guttural calls. --AWeith 13:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A young and an adult white-tailed eagle fighting --AWeith 13:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Fantastic image. There is a small ammount of visible noise at full resolution, but given the image size and other qualities it's easily a QI for me. --Prosthetic Head 14:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A young white-tailed eagle in flight (1) --AWeith 13:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 13:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An adult white-tailed eagle successfully chases a young bird away from its prey. --AWeith 13:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Granada 20:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A young white-tailed eagle in flight (2) --AWeith 13:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Island, Öxarárfoss im Þingvellir Nationalpark --Ralf Roletschek 12:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Þingvellir, Island --Ralf Roletschek 12:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline Quite unsharp Volvo advertisement. And the lake leaks to the left. --Granada 20:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Þingvellir, Island --Ralf Roletschek 12:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stokkur und Feld bei Geysir, Island --Ralf Roletschek 12:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline The blowing geysir hides quite well that this is blurry possibly due to camera shake. --Granada 20:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gullfoss, Island --Ralf Roletschek 12:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 13:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bas-relief. Bayon. Angkor Thom, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 12:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bayon. Angkor Thom, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 12:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monkey. Causeway to the Angkor Wat. Angkor Wat, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 12:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good sharp focus to main part of the photo --Michielverbeek 13:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Kösseine southeastward to the Steinwald--Milseburg 10:12, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 10:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri) female, India --Charlesjsharp 09:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline Focus on the branch, blurry bird --Basile Morin 10:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination
• 
  • Nomination Sarus crane (Grus antigone), India --Charlesjsharp 09:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sarus cranes (Grus antigone), India --Charlesjsharp 09:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Southern grey shrike (Lanius meridionalis lahtora), Rajasthan --Charlesjsharp 09:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basile Morin 10:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spotted dove (Spilopelia chinensis suratensis), Kanha National Park --Charlesjsharp 09:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, very pretty bird. -- Ikan Kekek 10:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opel Diplomat at exhibition --Hydro 08:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry, but the image is too grainy. --Halavar 12:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Delahaye Type 135 at the mountain race in Würgau 2017 --Ermell 08:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the lookout tower Hohes Kreuz near Engelhardsberg into the Wiesenttal to the ruins of the castle Neideck --Ermell 08:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 08:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alvis Speed 20 at the mountain race in Würgau 2017 --Ermell 08:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. I like how you can even see the driver's face in the mirror. :) --Peulle 09:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tomb slab in the simultaneous church in Untermerzbach --Ermell 08:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 09:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Horizontal volumes --Ermell 08:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basile Morin 13:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder). Panorama.
    --Famberhorst 07:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weyregg am Attersee and Seeberg, from between Unterbuchberg and Attersee am Attersee --Michielverbeek 07:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline Underexposed --Dmottl 09:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain trip from Churwalden Mittelberg (1500 meter) via Ranculier and Praden towards Tschiertschen. View from the road Praden to Tschiertschen.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain trip from Tschiertschen (1350 meters) via Ruchtobel towards Ochsenalp. Rapids in the Urdenbach.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain trip from Tschiertschen (1350 meters) via Ruchtobel towards Ochsenalp. View on Tschiertschen.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:24, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Loch Gynack and the hill Creag Mhor in the Scottish Highlands --Spike 02:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A panorama of Loch Ewe in the Scottish Highlands --Spike 02:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Christmas food --The Photographer 18:00, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok --Sputniktilt 21:36, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blick aus dem Hotelfenster des Hotel71 in DhakaDeutsch: View from the hotel window of Hotel71 in Dhaka --Kritzolina 09:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --A.Savin 01:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blaue Lagune, Island --Ralf Roletschek 20:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Sputniktilt 21:32, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of mountains and trees in Clearwater Wilderness, WA --Trougnouf 18:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Similar to the other picture, reviewed on 31st Dec.: a nice composition, but there is an issue with sharpness, sorry. --Sputniktilt 21:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hórreo at Xacebáns, municipality of Quintela de Leirado, Ourense. (Spain) --Elisardojm 18:46, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Spasskaya tower at night. December 2015. Moscow Kremlin --WM wm WM 14:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Please check your image. It needs perspective correction, sharpness could be improved. The DoF is small and there is noise. The image needs a better categorization and it's overcategorized. --XRay 17:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)  Not done --A.Savin 17:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wat Arun Temple, Bangkok, Thailand --Poco a poco 11:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed

Consensual review

File:Buriganga_at_the_port_Sadarghat_02.jpg

• Nomination Buriganga River in Dhaka at the port , boats waiting for passengers. By User:Kritzolina --Masum-al-hasan 10:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Fix chromatic aberrations, please. --A.Savin 16:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose ...and correct the perspective, too, both sides are leaning out. --Basotxerri 10:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 13:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Chapelle Notre-Dame du Sacré-Cœur, rue Saint-Sulpice, Montreal.jpg

• Nomination Montreal City Hall, Canada --Poco a poco 10:38, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Im very sorry, but the perspective does not work for me and the top of the tower as the most interesting part of the image is blurry. --Granada 10:49, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

•  New version Poco a poco 11:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm gonna stick with my opinion, but I've reset it back to nomination. Other opinions, please! --Granada 11:33, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose The perspective looks absolutely unrealistic for me. Therefore no QI in my opinion. But lets here others. -- Spurzem 21:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 05:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 13:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Baggerdepot Broek bij Joure zw 03.jpg

• Nomination Mud Depot Broek bij Joure. Highly dangerous Quicksand.
  --Famberhorst 06:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I see a big dust spot toward the upper right corner, visible on the file page even without any enlargement. -- Ikan Kekek 05:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

• Provisional  Oppose until the big dust spot is taken care of. -- Ikan Kekek 20:46, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

 Done. Removed spots. Thank you for your reviews.--Famberhorst 18:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you.  Support - Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 00:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Support this version -- Basile Morin 11:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 13:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Dampremy_-_Soumonces_2014_-_03.jpg

• Nomination Autumn carnival in Dampremy (Charleroi) --Jmh2o 18:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
• The image seems OK but I think in this kind of image the statement about personality rights is required (see other portrait shots at QIC). --Basotxerri 21:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC).

I know the rules and laws from my country. Both persons look to the photographer, so they know a take a picture. --Jmh2o 21:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

For pictures with people always add this PR template--Basile Morin 02:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Basile, this was the one I was thinking of. --Basotxerri 16:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

 Comment The template is in place but I'm not super happy with the right crop (see fingers). What do we think?--Peulle 15:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

@Peulle: Well, I started this because the image seemed OK for me. But feel free to move it to CR if you're unlucky with the crop. --Basotxerri 18:25, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

•  weak oppose Yes, let's get some more opinions at CR. Considering the fingers could easily be cropped out, I think it should be done.--Peulle 18:40, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Thank you Peulle, OK let's see. --Basotxerri 19:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I have changed the right crop, is the composition better now? --Jmh2o 19:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Good enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, better.--Peulle 11:51, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri 15:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Alright for me -- Sixflashphoto 16:46, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice picture, but no good lighting and therefore no QI for me -- Spurzem 21:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment question to Spurzem can you give a description for what can be a good lighting for this picture? So a can learn from my errors. --Jmh2o 17:58, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 13:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:17-12-03-Hospital_de_Sant_Pau_(BCN)_Pavelló_de_Sant_Rafael-RalfR-DSCF0539.jpg

• Nomination Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona --Ralf Roletschek 10:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Really good transport of emotional rooms. I hate hospitals and here i can smell it! And I´m frozen, too. That´s the picmakers job, transporting emotions. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose for discussion: the perspective should be corrected, since the sides are leaning out, is that not right?--Peulle 14:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

 Comment A slight perspective correction should be done. -- Spurzem 21:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

 Done --Ralf Roletschek 16:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - Ralf, you improved the picture, and it's a good picture. One question: Is the blue on the windows on the left side true to life, or is it CA that should be fixed? I see it especially in the dividers between the three parts of each window grouping. -- Ikan Kekek 05:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

 Done blue reduced. --Ralf Roletschek 11:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks. Good enough now.  Support -- Ikan Kekek 12:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Support as it is -- Basile Morin 10:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 13:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:20171123_FIFA_Women's_World_Cup_2019_Qualifying_Round_AUT-ISR_850_6748.jpg

• Nomination FIFA Women's World Cup 2019 Qualifying Round Austria vs. Israel November 23, 2017 BSFZ-Arena Maria Enzersdorf. Picture shows Shay Sade (5, ISR), Viktoria Pinther (4, AUT)--Granada 10:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better - theoretically. IMO good for this kind of image. --XRay 10:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Same problem as the others; especially the face of the person on the left doesn't seem sharp.--Peulle 11:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
• It's not perfect  Support, but sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 08:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support this is not in the photo studio --Ralf Roletschek 08:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

• It's not a valid argument for QI. If one takes blurred picture of some unique event then it may be VI or FP, but not QI because QI is just about quality, not importance of picture itself or difficulties in taking it. --Shansov.net 11:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

@Shansov.net: Sorry, this argument is just not true. QI has several exceptions for photographs taken in difficult circumstances. Motion blurs are sometimes allowed (and sometimes even desirable). It is also allowed to shoot with very high ISO settings, if not otherwise possible. Qi was never intended as an event to filter out only absolutely technically perfect photos, but as a motivation, especially for newcomers, to observe basic technical rules to raise the average level of photos for Commons and Wikipedia. QI was meant to mark well-made images, below FP standards, so that they could be easily found in some huge categories full of scrap photos. --Smial 01:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment BTW red category link should be fixed.--Peulle 14:08, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - The photo is fine and I will support once the red link is fixed. -- Ikan Kekek 17:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

  The red link has longest been fixed! --Granada 19:09, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

• I still saw it when I posted that. In any case, I now  Support. -- Ikan Kekek 09:39, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Image is not sharp. --Shansov.net 11:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Per Xray. --Smial 19:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 14:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sputniktilt 21:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 13:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Farmhouse_at_Kelvin_A._Lewis_farm_in_Creeds_15.jpg

• Nomination Farmhouse at Kelvin A. Lewis farm in Creeds 15 --PumpkinSky 01:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective problems --Jacek Halicki 22:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Jacek Halicki, I have tried to fix this. PumpkinSky 23:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 08:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective is not well done --Michielverbeek 22:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Michiel, too tight crop to correct --A.Savin 16:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 13:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC))

File:White_Temple_IV.jpg

• Nomination Bildserie des Wat Rong Kuhn / White Temple in Nord-Thailand. Er dürfte populärer als der schwarze Tempel in der Region sein.Deutsch: English: A photo of a popular tourist attraction in northern Thailand, Wat Rong Kuhn, also known as the White Temple --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 18:14, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. Could possibly use a slight perspective correction on the bottom barrier. English description is marked as Deutsch. --Trougnouf 00:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

• Take critic not as a bunch. Bottom ist gauge, nearly a laser, but seen something else;-) THX (eigentlich hatte ich auf andere "Kritik" wie überbelichteter Himmel oder so was gewartet und das beim weißen Tempel, wo derzeit wieder alle an den Schatten kämpfen...--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 00:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose However, the colour fringes in the sky should be removed as well as the dust spots. The burned-out part on the right doesn't work for me. --Ermell 20:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Done --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 13:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

 Comment The clouds are without saturation and turn into light blue a few meters later? I have never seen this in reality but this might be o.k. for QI.--Ermell 07:58, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

In one way, the only one, You make me a little bit nervouse. I´m really not sure if the time stamps (more timezones) from cam or GPS are right. The pictures from White

Temple are taken at two different days. First day at evening (a warm light at a hot day) and from early morning, before the tourists will arrive (wet&cold light) up to lunch. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 13:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Bottom crop, Sky seems overexposed, and as Ermell --Lmbuga 12:35, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - I don't get what would be wrong with the bottom crop; if anything, it's the right crop that bothers me a bit, but none of the crops seem unacceptable. And I believe I remember skies like that from the time I lived in Southeast Asia. I believe the sun is generally brighter near the equator. But be that as it may, the picture looks good to me, and I'd have to think it would be challenging to get such a really clear view of all that metal, so I'll take whatever sky within reason went along with the settings for that facade. -- Ikan Kekek 07:30, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Ikan, but doesnt´t makes sense, if someones reacting only with nosefactor. Only two marks to keep serious: "The metal" are small mirrors. White Temple is something like "The Bollywood"-WAT - The sun is not burned (hard bright Light from right, check out roof) and not strange for Asia. And this is North-Thailand, not the South. The equator argument is imho stronger in Turkmenistan, Azer or Laos....all the rest is intended and not random as...At my start-time here, I have seen some images from a well known user from commons, (seen by upload after taken mine). He was the one and only with correct arguments and praises the result. Since that time I take it with humor. My only personal matter with pictures from mine is the missing old style of the wooden bridge. But that´s a point of the artist of Wat Rong Kuhn--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 13:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Are you arguing with my support vote? -- Ikan Kekek 20:49, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Nope, I thank You. Just precise metal to mirrors. Hans-Jürgen

If you want to be precise, don't argue that Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan are closer to the equator than Thailand is. I used to live in Malaysia, which is a lot closer to Thailand than either of those countries and closer to the equator than Thailand is, and I believe I recognize this appearance of a sky. If I'm wrong, you are weakening my support argument for you, and maybe I should reconsider... -- Ikan Kekek 05:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Far too tight crop on top, unfortunate on bottom, burnt sky, left side leaning in. Not a QI. Poco a poco 12:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Puelle Poco PumpkinSky 22:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Me? I don't recall making any comment on this image.--Peulle 22:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

• • • I meant Poco. Fixed. PumpkinSky 00:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 23:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support not easy to get to a decision. There are many other images of the Wat Rong Kuhn with a better composition, including other imags made by Hans-Jürgen Neubert. But considering the great details in the center area and compared to other images with a QI stamp, this one can pass. --Sputniktilt 21:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 13:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)