Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 02 2020

• 
  • Nomination Northbank and Yarra River, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia --XRay 03:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination At the shore of Lake Rotoroa in Nelson Lakes NP, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 00:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 02:53, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Larus michahellis in Farnese Gardens, Rome, Italy. --Tournasol7 00:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GRDN711 01:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porte Comtale – fortifications of Capdenac, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 00:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Aynac, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 00:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Square town gate in Villeneuve, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Impressionen vom Naturschutzgebiet "Düne am Rimmelsberg" In Jörl --Nightflyer 23:04, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:09, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Das Haus Fabrikgasse 1 ist ein Umgebindehaus in Obercummersdorf --Nightflyer 23:04, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "October" cinema hall in Gyumri, Armenia. --Armenak Margarian 18:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:15, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ECONOMICAL LED BULB LIGHTED ON THE WALLON THE WALL - --Adoscam 16:26, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    At first, capslock switched on in the title and description is not indicated. --Tournasol7 16:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose noise, composition, sharpness --Charlesjsharp 18:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USSR camera. Zenit 11 and lens Helios 44 M. --Dmitry Makeev 15:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 22:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination AN ECONOMICAL LED BULB Not LIGHTED ON THE WALLON THE WALL --Adoscam 15:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose noise etc. --Charlesjsharp 18:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common sergeant (Athyma perius) --Charlesjsharp 14:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 18:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common small flat (Sarangesa dasahara) --Charlesjsharp 14:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 18:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Afriland children's games in Fifadji in Cotonou Benin--Adoscam 13:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline No good image, too bright -- Spurzem 14:45, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose overexposed --Charlesjsharp 18:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz 190 SL, W121BII, 1958 --Berthold Werner 13:18, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good for me --Armenak Margarian 19:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Millwall from the Thames. London --Ввласенко 13:17, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good composition, sharp, and well exposed. --Bobulous 15:08, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Afriland children's games in Fifadji in Cotonou Benin --Adoscam 13:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose tilted --Charlesjsharp 18:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Bismarck tower (closeup). --PantheraLeo1359531 11:57, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 19:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Runkel castle, Germany. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:38, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion I absolutely love this composition. I think this is an FP and will nominate very soon if you don't. -- Ikan Kekek 09:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bischofsplatz Limburg an der Lahn, Germany. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sankt Lubentius church, Dietkirchen, Germany. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:34, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good composition, and I love that you got the flying bird in it. Please add a category for the bird. -- Ikan Kekek 09:59, 30 December 2019 (UTC)  Comment Thank you for review. I assume you are joking about the category of the tiny bird (common house martin) ... --Johannes Robalotoff 11:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
     Comment No, I'm not joking. Why would it not merit a category? -- Ikan Kekek 11:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sankt Lubentius church, Dietkirchen, Germany. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Another good composition. A bit of noise in the sky at full size, but I think it's OK, given the size of the photo. -- Ikan Kekek 10:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quarto de D. Sebastião, Palácio Nacional, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 08:34, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment The image does not show the Palácio as a whole, but a special interior. What is it? The image description should reflect that. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
    I copied (redundantly) the name of the room from the category to the description. Having this information in the category is enough to find the file over the cat tree and over a search --Poco a poco 10:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)  Support Oh, sorry. This was a misunderstanding. Obviously my understanding of Portuguese was not good enough. Image is good for me, given the difficult light conditions. --Johannes Robalotoff 11:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)  Comment Tough already promoted: The "English" version of the image description is also in Portuguese. A real translation could help to avoid such misunderstandings ... --Johannes Robalotoff 13:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii), Punta Pitt, San Cristobal Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 08:34, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support It seems good for me. --Tournasol7 16:44, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
    Sure, a good photo, but this is a juvenile and should be identified as such in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek 02:57, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Office, Chile --Poco a poco 08:34, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Office, Chile --Poco a poco 08:34, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Exmoorpony.
    --Famberhorst 07:26, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 07:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour in the vicinity of mountain village S-charl. USTARIA house in S-charl. (Detail)
    --Famberhorst 07:26, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 07:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tremella mesenterica, yellow brain, golden jelly fungus, yellow trembler, in the Bruderwald in Bamberg. Focus stack from 32 frames. --Ermell 07:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ceiling in the former abbey church in Ebrach --Ermell 07:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vineyard near Ebelsbach-Eltmann in Lower Franconia in the district of Haßberge --Ermell 07:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aermacchi a la rossa 1958 at the mountain race in Würgau 2019 --Ermell 07:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pipe organ in the simultaneous church in Untermerzbach --Ermell 07:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination eggs of - Oeufs de Aigle ravisseur Nord-Africain --Ercé 07:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a sundial, Psilaxis oxytropis --Llez 06:41, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maruia Falls on Maruia River in Tasman Region, South Island, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 06:44, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall of Apolda, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Weimar, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:44, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vieux Pont in Belcastel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour in the vicinity of mountain village S-charl. Wooden door in a residential house in S-charl.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Vnà to Zuort. Suspension bridge between Val Sinestra and Zuort.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Vnà to Zuort. Hof Zuort, Historic Hotel.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mexican Army boat, in Museo Naval, Veracruz --Cvmontuy 05:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gun boat Guanajuato C-07, Veracruz, Mexico --Cvmontuy 04:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Herbier national du Bénin --Fawaz.tairou 04:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Late baroque portal of the rectory on Oberer Kirchenweg #9 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish barn on Oberer Kirchenweg #9 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hiking trail in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. But I would crop out half of leaves at the bottom. --XRay 06:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cemetery and tabernacle wayside shrine on Oberer Kirchenweg in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tabernacle wayside shrine on Oberer Kirchenweg in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Uluru (Ayers Rock) in Uluṟu-Kata Tjuṯa National Park, Petermann Ranges, Northern Territory, Australia --XRay 03:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roof of the Opera House, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia --XRay 03:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Cross monastery at Anogyra. --Xaris333 03:05, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. JPEG artifacts and posterization. --XRay 06:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Cross monastery at Anogyra. --Xaris333 03:05, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Very unsharp on and distorted on the right side. Noise and color artifacts in the sky. Sharpening halo around the tower. Aggressive noise reduction. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tamischbachturm with fresh snow seen from the East --Domob 18:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support - Nice and painterly. -- Ikan Kekek 05:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Risan, Bay of Kotor, Montenegro --Poco a poco 16:38, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful, but is that a dust spot in the lower right? -- Ikan Kekek 05:23, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 10:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
    Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
     Comment - You could have waited a few hours for me to promote the photo, but OK. -- Ikan Kekek 21:59, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mount Kinabalu viewed from Kundasang. --Tofeiku 09:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Detail strongly washed out by noise reduction. Distorted. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:44, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Planta Tower and Reformed Church in Susch, Engadina. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:35, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion It needs a perspective correction, left part is hanging to the left and the right part is leaning to the right --Michielverbeek 08:40, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
    Done --JoachimKohler-HB 15:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
    Good quality now --Michielverbeek 22:07, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fennel in the Bellevue Sobriety Garden --Rhododendrites 17:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grass skipper on zinnia in the Brooklyn Botanic Garden --Rhododendrites 17:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose The butterfly is very sharp. But the red channel is so strongly blown out on the flower that color reproduction has become wrong. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:39, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Floating power plant Hummel in Rugenberger Hafen, Hamburg --MB-one 23:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of São José, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores. -- Felix Koenig 20:10, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mustafa Öztürk im Rahmen des WLP Projektes in der Bremischen Bürgerschaft von User:Foto-AG Melle --Olaf Kosinsky 09:04, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jastrow 05:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ramparts of the historic fortified city of Carcassone, Aude, France. --Tournasol7 08:05, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the Protestant Church St.Michael in Obermerzbach --Ermell 07:37, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: rocks of MODR, in Kryvy Rih. By User:Александр Водолазский --Anntinomy 08:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The Clock Tower Quay, Montreal. --The Cosmonaut 03:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
    It's tilted a bit (leaning to teh right, see the tower edges) --Podzemnik 03:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
     Done - indeed, corrected. --The Cosmonaut 03:09, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Parisian Macao hotel and tower seen at night in Macao, China --Shantham11 17:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination MAN Lion's City G CNG in Oldenburg, Germany. --Jacek79 12:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Lots of chroma noise --MB-one 17:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
     Comment In very dark parts of the pic, yes. Better now? --Jacek79 21:26, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose Unfortunately still very noisy --MB-one 13:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:View_of_Hermitage_Community_Moorings_and_Canary_Wharf_from_Tower_Bridge._London.jpg

• Nomination View of Hermitage Community Moorings and Canary Wharf from Tower Bridge. London --Ввласенко 07:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good quality--Horst J. Meuter 13:27, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose - I don't think this is sharp enough for a cityscape in 2019. I may well be voted down, but I think it's worth a discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 13:46, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
   Support Can't detect any sharpness issue here. Even the corners are quite sharp for full frame and such a huge resolution. If local contrast diminishes on distant houses this is just real world physics, as long as we live under an atmosphere as opposed to empty space. It's not a fault of the image. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:59, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - The left foreground isn't very sharp, for example. And I think some of the skyscrapers seem noisy or somehow off, while others are IMO insufficiently sharp. Nowadays, these kinds of panoramas can be excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 11:45, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Ikan Kekek's comment. --PtrQs 18:38, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan. Blurring noise reduction? --Smial 20:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 15:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Butterfly_By_Ahamed_Rafid.jpg

• Nomination Honey collection of a butterfly from Transvaal Daisy flower.--Ahamed Rafid 08:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Oppose The proper categorisation is needed, as well as description of the subject, at least the species names of flower and butterfly. The noise is very distracting. I'm afraid I must oppose this one until corrected. --Stoxastikos 15:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
   Support Very good composition, good sharpness on the main object, a bit noisy. For me QI. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 18:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose pending successful denoising and proper categorization (the species of the butterfly and the flower). -- Ikan Kekek 13:52, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too noisy, but by denoising this picture will become even more blotched. --PtrQs 13:57, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment If it were denoised first and then sharpened, it may have turned out all right. It looks like the noise was sharpened here excessively. --Stoxastikos (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support as Spurzem, the noise not disturbs. --Ralf Roletschek 20:38, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - I note again how few people are discussing the absence of acceptable categorization. -- Ikan Kekek 05:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • No categorization is required to assess the quality of an image. Why don't you open a competition: Commons:Quality categorisation candidates Then everyone who likes to play with categories can let off steam and photographers can assess the quality of photos here in peace. --Ralf Roletschek 11:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

• Really, stop trying to gaslight everyone. You know very well what the QI criteria are: They're at the top of this page! -- Ikan Kekek 11:48, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

 Comment Ralf, so langsam verstehe ich deinen Feldzug nicht mehr. Du lehnst sinnvolle Kategorisierungen als QI-Kriterium ab. Du ziehst gute Fotos zurück, weil die wegen wirklich dürftiger Beschreibung Kontras kassieren. Wie genau sollen Nachnutzer deiner Meinung nach denn QI-Bilder suchen und (auf-)finden? Über den Dateinamen? Da lehnst du Änderungen ja ebenfalls ab. Ein Freund von wikidata bist du nach meiner Erinnerung auch nicht. Also wat denn nu? --Smial 23:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata und Semantik. Kategorien waren schon vor Jahrzehnten veraltet und Dateinamen sind ein technisches Hilfsmittel. Nachnutzer benutzen keine Kategorien sondern Google und Wikipedia. Ich lehne es ab, daß die Qualität von Fotos an Namen oder Kategorien gemessen wird. Fangen wir nach der Umstellung auf Wikidata bei Null an? Dann gibts keine Kategorien mehr. --Ralf Roletschek 08:41, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Google? Was muß man denn da eingeben? Zumindest mit "Prag AelterMarkt +site:commons.wikimedia.org" (und mehreren verschiedenen Schreibweisen und Kombinatiónen von "alter" und "markt" findet deine schönen Weihnachtsmarktbilder nicht. Ok, man kann seine Fotos latürnich mit Gewalt in möglichst viele Wikipediaartikel drücken, dann wird es sicherlich besser... -- Smial 09:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Looks like not to rescue. --A.Savin 12:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 14:59, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

File:San_Bartolomé,_Lago_del_Rey,_Alemania,_2019-05-17,_DD_21.jpg

• Nomination St. Bartholomew's Church, Königssee, Germany. --Poco a poco 10:51, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 10:57, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. unnatural color fringes around the snow fields in the area on the top right. Sorry, not a QI for me. --Milseburg 20:31, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Neutral Purple fringes as per user Milseburg, as well as rather extended unsharp areas around both right corners. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

   CA Fixed cannot understand that somebody can expect sharpness in the subject at the front and back in the mountains. The subject here is the church Poco a poco 10:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

   Comment Thank you for removing the purple fringes. As for sharpness: The composition lives from showing the church (which is relatively small on the image) in its surroundings, namely the lake and the mountains. Therefore I think it is normal to expect sharpness of the mountain. Moreover, from the technical point of view it is normal to expect the sharpness as described, because with 35 mm focal length at full frame and with f/9 you have a vast depth of field, so that both church and mountains will be sharp with almost any sensible focus. If you look at the center for the image, you can see that this is actually the case there. Only to the right sharpness falls strongly off. This is not a DoF issue, but it looks as if it were just a common lens limitation. (May be the fact that the EF28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM is a super-zoom weighted out the manufacturers pro classification here? This model was also designed before 2004, when nobody could dream of 50 MP sensors..) The effect exists also on the left, but less prominent, may be because the image was cropped at the left (assuming that your lens is not decentered). --Johannes Robalotoff 13:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

 Comment The lens weakens towards the edges of the image, that's true. On the other hand, as is well known, six MPixels are sufficient for any image magnification at normal viewing distances. Only with higher requirements you really need the higher resolutions. But if somebody offers his photos in (nearly) full resolution and in this resolution lens defects become visible which would not be visible at six MPixels, then in my opinion a "decline" is unfair if it is obvious that the photographer got the best out of his lens and at the same time the defect is not visible at "normal" viewing distances. We had some cases recently where the photographer worked with an open aperture and absurdly short exposure times, which caused edge blurring. Of course, I consider this a mistake. It is also an error if you shoot unnecessarily with f/22 or f/32 and the image is completely blurred due to diffraction. And now we come to downscaling: It is absurd to insist that photos must not be reduced in size. Taken with the same lens under the same conditions, only with a, let's say, eight-megapixel camera and uploaded with native resolution, the (successfully removed) CA would probably have been found, but no significant blurring, and the photo would have been accepted without any trouble. I don't believe in extreme reduction either, so I'm asking for at least six megapixels in 2019 for photos of this kind, but a reasonable and moderate reduction may well be necessary, especially in the case of perspective corrections. I therefore consider the stubborn insistence that full resolution is always required and then counting pixels to be counterproductive and not appropriate for the QI process. --Smial 09:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

 Comment I totally agree with you, Smial. I would appreciate it if we could discard the QI rule that forbids downscaling, for exactly the reasons that you describe. (Alternatively: Recommend review on a certain downscaled size.) I would also support the current image, if the kind of reasoning which you outlined were commonly accepted on this page. We should have at least roughly consistent judging. Unfortunately most reviewers decline images with sharpness defects of that kind at full resolution. Therefore changed to neutral only at the moment. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support The snow surfaces are still a tiny bit too bright, but that's counting peas. Excellent rework and definitely QI now. --Smial 08:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC) Ps: From a technical point of view I would like to know how the color fringes on the upper right came about, because they didn't look like the typical lateral chromatic aberration.

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Seven Pandas 14:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

File:LSG_Sörenberg.jpg

• Nomination Sörenberg, protected Landscape in Rems-Murr-Kreis, Germany. --Laserlicht 13:59, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:41, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. Tilted ccw. --Milseburg 20:41, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Done Corrected the ccw tilt. --Laserlicht 22:20, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

I think, it´s ok now. --Milseburg (talk) 21:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 14:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Front_FFW_Hof_20191212.jpg

• Nomination Front view of the Volunteer fire department of Hof, Bavaria, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment Many dust spots to remove. --Steindy 20:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Done Dust spots removed, but I assume that some rainy spots on buildings were classified as dust spots. It had been rained before the photographs were created, so maybe this could lead to some pseudo dust spots --PantheraLeo1359531 11:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
    • Not all. --Steindy 00:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
      •  Done New version uploaded --PantheraLeo1359531 16:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:47, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed sky; parts of the building are not sharp. --A.Savin 15:10, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Doesn't look overexposed to me, but rather, I see it as an accurate portrayal of a type of light I've sometimes seen after a storm. Sharp enough, IMO, in this light. -- Ikan Kekek 05:19, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Done Dust spots were removed, thanks fo the annotations --PantheraLeo1359531 07:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I also think that the sky is not overexposed. Winter skies are often this way, almost white and featureless, especially during or after the rain/snowfall. The sharpness is acceptable. --Stoxastikos (talk) 16:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 14:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)