Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 27 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Osteospermum_'Dixie'_-_2018-05-21_-_Andy_Mabbett_-_03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Osteospermum 'Dixie'. --Pigsonthewing 21:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 22:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I fins it too soft. Please discuss --Podzemnik 02:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too blurry. Sorry.
  •  Oppose Too blurry. Unsigned vote above stricken, please sign your votes for them to count.--Peulle 12:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too blurry. Sorry.--Ermell 14:15, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Yes, somewhat soft, but good composition, good lighting and good reproduction of the difficult red tones. --Smial 12:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 17:15, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Plaines_d'Abraham.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Plaines d'AbrahamI --Wilfredor 18:57, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 22:52, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blown highlights and CA. Sorry. --Ermell 23:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 Comment It's surprising that the nominator saw the tiny CAs on the steering wheel of the AU 1000 S, but not the much clearer ones on the leaves in his photo. As the Bible says: You see the splinter in the brother's eye, but you don't see the beam in your own eye. (Mt 7,4) -- Spurzem 11:33, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Spurzem :) --Wilfredor 22:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell.--Peulle 12:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell. --Smial 12:33, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 17:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Ibis_Friedrichshafen_Airport,_Friedrichshafen_(1X7A0110).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Hotel Ibis Friedrichshafen Airport --MB-one 13:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
     Oppose Insufficient quality. --Beninho 19:56, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
    Please give a reason. --MB-one 12:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support o.k. for me--Ermell 09:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unfavorable bottom crop. --Milseburg 09:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Aristeas 10:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 09:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)