Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 25 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Die Störfähre Else, eine der letzten Seilfähren Deutschlands --Nightflyer 22:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 22:32, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St. Laurence, Seale --Lewis Hulbert 22:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 22:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Front door of the town hall ( house built in the 17th century) of Vanxains Dordogne, France. --JLPC 18:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church (12th, 15th and 16th centuries) of Grassac, Charente, France. --JLPC 18:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Musicians of "Oschtalb Ruassgugga" Guggenmusik band at International Guggenmusik Meeting 2014, Schwäbisch Gmünd --Kreuzschnabel 16:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality (but needs a 90° anti-clockwise rotation on the flash reader). --JLPC 18:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
What can I do about this? --Kreuzschnabel 18:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tampella building in Tampere, Finland. --Kulmalukko 14:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 23:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the bridge Laukonsilta along the river Tammerkoski in Tampere, Finland. --Kulmalukko 14:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 17:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffitis in the fort du Salbert, Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 09:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 20:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pyramid of the Moon, Teotihuacán, Mexico --Poco a poco 07:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 09:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Avenue of the Dead, Teotihuacán, Mexico --Poco a poco 07:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 09:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Archaeological area of Cantona, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 07:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Please have a look to the dust spot. --XRay 09:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Cleaned Poco a poco 09:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Support OK.--XRay 10:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Archaeological area of Cantona, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 07:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ArildV 09:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Albarracín, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 07:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 09:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basaltic Prisms, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 07:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 22:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination High Gate, Daroca, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 07:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ArildV 09:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Mauritian Conch, Conomurex decorus --Llez 06:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lytse Mâr. Location: The Alde Feanen. In management at It Fryske Gea.--
Famberhorst 06:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Lytse Mâr. Location: The Alde Feanen. In management at It Fryske Gea.--
-
- Nomination A pair of Chichibu Railway 1000 series EMU trains in Japan (by Shellparakeet) --DAJF 05:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit small but QI to me --Poco a poco 07:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve "Venner Moor" near Senden, Noth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
There is some overexposure that would be acceptable to me if you fix the strong CA Poco a poco 07:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Fixed Sorry. CAs removed.--XRay 09:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Nature reserve "Venner Moor" near Senden, Noth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve "Venner Moor" near Senden, Noth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Some CA even here. --ArildV 09:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Fixed CAs removed. Thanks for your advice.--XRay 14:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks, better now.--ArildV 19:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mühlbach and Hausdülmen, Germany (new image) --XRay 04:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gate to the botanical garden in the castle garden of the castle of Münster (Westfalen) --XRay 04:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A sheep and lambs in Breidsæterdalen, Oppland, Norway, in 2013 June --Ximonic 04:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Undoubtedly a good quality image, but please note that the guidelines do recommend limiting nominations to a "couple" in one go, as flooding is considered bad form. --DAJF 05:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fv55 road on the highlands at Sognefjellet, Sogn og Fjordane, Norway, in 2013 June --Ximonic 04:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Interesting --Poco a poco 07:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oscarshaug, Sogn og Fjordane, Norway, in 2013 June --Ximonic 04:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Good, but need more specific categories Poco a poco 07:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Question Do you know what these things are called? You can point this at a mountain summit and it tells the height and name of it. --Ximonic 07:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Cannot tell you by heart, I was rather thinking of something like "Observation decks" Poco a poco 08:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Done Yes exactly, I made some new categories to Commons so one can search for observation decks located in Norway. So I added a new category to this picture as well. --Ximonic 08:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Oscarshaug, Sogn og Fjordane, Norway, in 2013 June --Ximonic 04:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Borgund Stave Chuch in Lærdalen, Sogn og Fjordane, Norway, in 2013 June --Ximonic 04:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Interessting --Poco a poco 07:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Austanbotntindane, Sogn og Fjordane, Norway, in 2013 June --Ximonic 04:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Isn't there some purple cast? not sure, QI to me anyhow --Poco a poco 07:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Done Perhaps some kind of a polarization effect? I don't know because the colors were original. Anyway I changed it a little - reduced the purple. --Ximonic 07:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Breidsæterdalen towards north, Oppland, Norway, in 2013 June --Ximonic 04:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture at the bottom right of the front steps of the facade of O Obradoiro, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 00:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice! FP level to me --Poco a poco 07:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Towers of the Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela. Galicia --Lmbuga 00:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --Poco a poco 07:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Petzenkirchen, Federal Agency for Water Management, Institute for Land & Water Management Research, sgraffito above entrance --P e z i 22:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Needs horizontal perspective correction Poco a poco 08:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 09:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good job! --Poco a poco 19:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Castle Petzenkirchen, Federal Agency for Water Management, Institute for Land & Water Management Research, sgraffito above entrance --P e z i 22:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus stop in Vienna --Linie29 19:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Petzenkirchen, Federal Agency for Water Management, Institute for Land & Water Management Research, plaque at entrance --P e z i 19:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment not quite straight, should be distorted a bit CCW. --Herzi Pinki 21:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 22:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Support Looks good now. --DAJF 05:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Castle Petzenkirchen, Federal Agency for Water Management, Institute for Land & Water Management Research, plaque at entrance --P e z i 19:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basaltic Prisms, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. (please remove dust spot) --P e z i 17:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 19:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Melocactus violaceus, Munich Botanical Garden, Germany --Poco a poco 19:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 09:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Paris Métro MP 05 train leaving the Esplanade de la Défense station --DXR 18:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok --Poco a poco 08:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture of Nandi at the Sun Temple, Modhera --Bgag 15:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New high-rise buildings of Tallinn in fog at Sunset --Urmas83 15:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Interesting, but I would crop a good bunch at the bottom --Poco a poco 08:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hills in Koktebel, Crimean peninsula, Ukraine. --Kulmalukko 14:17, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, but the left side is not sharp enough. --Iifar 19:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
You're right. (I declined it.) --Kulmalukko 19:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Geneva MotorShow 2013 - Alfa-Romeo 4C grey front light --Pleclown 12:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 08:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Orakei marina, west of the Auckland CBD, one of the newer marinas of the city, as seen from Tamaki Drive --DXR 10:53, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Image looks rotated. Can you straighten horizon? --Nino Verde 12:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Done you're right, it was a bit tilted, thanks for review. --DXR 12:27, 21 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Much better. Thanks. --Nino Verde 05:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination The Orakei marina, west of the Auckland CBD, one of the newer marinas of the city, as seen from Tamaki Drive --DXR 10:53, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gummer's How, Cumbria. Mattbuck 08:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Too hazy, nothing really sharp --Poco a poco 08:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ford Focus. Mattbuck 08:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit distorted due to wide angle, but fine to me --Poco a poco 08:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rievaulx Abbey. Mattbuck 08:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok --Poco a poco 08:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Road past Jan Durkspolder in the Alde Feanen.--
Famberhorst 05:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
There is some CA (look on the top right), sharpness just ok Poco a poco 08:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Done Correction.
Famberhorst 16:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Road past Jan Durkspolder in the Alde Feanen.--
-
- Nomination The nave of Salisbury Cathedral. By User:Rafesmar --Nev1 18:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Needs perspective correction Poco a poco 21:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC) - Decline Already QI. --Lewis Hulbert 01:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination The nave of Salisbury Cathedral. By User:Rafesmar --Nev1 18:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mailboxes in Palma de Mallorca --Ralf Roletschek 14:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI imo. --ArildV 09:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination fluweelpootje (Flammulina velutipes).--
Famberhorst 16:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC).
Please add the species name to the file description. --Cayambe 10:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Done Thank you.--
Famberhorst 16:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 21:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination fluweelpootje (Flammulina velutipes).--
-
- Nomination Pompeii, forum, Macellum, fresco (no further information found) --Berthold Werner 07:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 09:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Church in North Bend, Washington, in sunlight with dark clouds behind --Jmabel 05:56, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Review Comment Please have a llok to the image. It needs perspective correction.--XRay 13:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment Not sure what you mean here by perspective correction. This is straight from the camera (a DSLR). The perspective is, as far as I can tell, exactly what the eye would observe from that location. - Jmabel 01:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment I'd added notices to your image explaining the problem.--XRay 08:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Parroquia_de_Santa_Clara_de_Asís,_Puebla,_México,_2013-10-11,_DD_07.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Parish of St Clara of Assisi, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 11:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Interesante prespectiva de las lineas internas. --Ivan2010 12:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree because of severe perspective issues --Uoaei1 21:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC) - Support good perspective, please dont distort it. --Ralf Roletschek 11:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support As per the comments above, the use of perspective makes the image more impressive. Looks good to me. --DAJF 03:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --JLPC 08:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Puente_romano_Cangas.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Puente romano de Cangas de Onís, Asturias (Spain) --Alan 20:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Support Hermosa composicion. --Ivan2010 08:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Subject too dark, burnt sky. --Kadellar 20:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose As for Kadellar. Noisy too. -- Smial 10:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Cayambe 13:40, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I dont know, I like this picture, however, of course my vote not count :P --The Photographer 19:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- The composition is very nice, but the image has too many technical flaws, sorry. -- Smial 22:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Hauptplatz Linz September 2013.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The main square of Linz, capital of Upper Austria, with the Holy Trinity column. -- Felix Koenig 16:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion The blue colour balance is IMHO not optimal: The forest is bearing too much cyan and there is magenta in the wires. Can you try to work on that? --Cccefalon 17:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Not done --Cccefalon 15:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I didn't fix anything because I couldn't identify what you meant (there is not even forest in the picture). Let's discuss. -- Felix Koenig 21:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
You are talking of another photo? The one, I reviewed has a forest. I made annotations. I just wonder, why you kept silent, before I declined ... --Cccefalon 21:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Why I kept silent? If a reviewer mentions "problems" which are not visible to the naked eye, there are 2 options: fuss or ignore. I decided to ignore. Referring to your "too much cyan", I recommend reading the article fog. Sorry if you feel mocked, but I can't take that serious. Felix Koenig 17:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC) - Support QI IMO Christian Ferrer 05:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Somewhat oversharpened (halos around wires), small remains of CA. Good lighting and composition. Colours are perfect, I don't understand the jokes with trees and cyan etc. -- Smial 10:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support yes, cyan on part of the wire and forest somewhat bluisch in the far distance... but overall QI to me. --Cayambe 13:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 11:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Looks good quality to me. --DAJF 06:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --DAJF 06:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Transport_in_Maracaibo_city.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Transport in Maracaibo city --The Photographer 02:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose burnt sky, messy composition, cut edge at the very left --A.Savin 17:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps the factor that is one of the most dangerous cities in the world could be considered. I only have a few seconds to take a photo and run. --The Photographer 19:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- QI is not concerned with extenuating circumstances. Either the image is good or it isn't, how difficult it was to capture is not the point - that is for VI. Mattbuck 22:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps the factor that is one of the most dangerous cities in the world could be considered. I only have a few seconds to take a photo and run. --The Photographer 19:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with the comment above about the blown-out sky. Also, the problem with the left-hand edge does not appear to have been fixed. --DAJF 03:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --DAJF 03:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
File:14-02-04-Parlement-européen-Strasbourg-RalfR-008.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Number Plate of diplomatic Corps of Luxembourgh --Ralf Roletschek 20:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Good quality. --JLPC 18:50, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Purple CA, especially on right, bad crop bottom right. --Mattbuck 18:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with the comment above that the cropping at the bottom right was just too tight. --DAJF 03:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --DAJF 03:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Tunstall Piperfon Connect.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Tunstall Piperfon Connect medical alarm device --Florian Fuchs 09:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support OK, even though it would have been better to have all in focus. --Pleclown 12:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Opposeirritating reflection of the subject --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Why is the reflection irritating? I created this on purpose because I wanted to make a picture of an object that is not so typically boring. --Florian Fuchs 08:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC) - Support Good quality and interesting composition. --EveryPicture 11:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Interesting idea and good quality. -- Felix Koenig 13:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Good quality image. --DAJF 01:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? -- DAJF 01:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)