Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 19 2019

• 
  • Nomination Wernberger Kreuz on Triester Strasse #1, Wernberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Resurrection of Christ at the south side of the Wernberger Kreuz on Triester Strasse #1, Wernberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northeastern partial view of the Wernberger Kreuz on Triester Strasse #1, Wernberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tilda Swinton at Vienna Internat. Film Festival 2018 --Tsui 01:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good Quality --PtrQs 02:32, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Valerie Pachner at the Austrian Film Awards 2019 --Tsui 01:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --PtrQs 02:32, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lamayuru Monastery, Ladakh, India --Bgag 01:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chorten in Lamayuru Monastery, Ladakh, India --Bgag 01:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of Chenrezi Lhakhang in Lamayuru Monastery, Ladakh, India --Bgag 01:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old woman with a prayer wheel in Lamayuru Monastery, Ladakh, India --Bgag 01:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chortens in Lamayuru Monastery, Ladakh, India --Bgag 01:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South facade of the Würzburg Residence, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 00:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Echinocactus grusonii in Dunedin Botanic Garden, Dunedin, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 00:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Valzergues, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tobacco kilns in DakLak province, Vietnam. --Shansov.net 22:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support A bit too close, but good for QI in my opinion. --Tournasol7 00:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Cyclophorid, Cyclophorus diplochilus --Llez 22:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Broich in Mülheim photographed from street side including entry to the yard --Tuxyso 19:20, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Broich in Mülheim photographed from street side, complete view with long-term construction site at the wall --Tuxyso 19:20, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Greimerath, Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Georg --Berthold Werner 19:08, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Overall sharpness and sharpness on the top of the church could be better, but all in all still QI for me. --Tuxyso 19:18, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Paris' Tomb --Paris Orlando 18:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for me. --Tuxyso 19:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Broich in Mülheim photographed from street side --Tuxyso 18:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Paris Orlando 18:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BLG-60 at Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018 --MB-one 10:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 13:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Harbor tower, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 10:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trabant 601 Kübel/TRAMP at Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018 --MB-one 10:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Elim Dune, Sossusvlei, Namibia --Poco a poco 10:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape in Namib-Naukluft National Park, Namibia --Poco a poco 10:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dune 7, Walvis Bay, Namibia --Poco a poco 10:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spitzkoppe, Namibia --Poco a poco 10:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Broich in Mülheim --Tuxyso 10:32, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Prien am Chiemsee (1920). --Palauenc05 08:04, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1 Mark "Notgeld" banknote of Prien am Chiemsee (1920). --Palauenc05 08:04, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Děčín-CZ, the castle at the Elbe --Michielverbeek 07:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 08:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Děčín-CZ, the old bridge (Tyršova) across the Elbe --Michielverbeek 07:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 08:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Děčín-CZ, street view (Labské nábřeží) near the old bridge across the Elbe --Michielverbeek 07:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Citroën DS 21 at ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 07:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gravestone at the Protestant church St. Burkard in Dörflis near Königsberg in Bavaria --Ermell 07:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of the church St. Martin in Forchheim --Ermell 07:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel in Heuchelheim near Schlüsselfeld --Ermell 07:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of St.Thadäus in the parish church Mariä Himmelfahrt in Memmelsdorf --Ermell 07:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Breil/Brigels direction Val Frisal. Environment of the Flembach stream.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panixersee (Lag da Pigniu) above Andiast. Reservoir and direct surroundings.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior view with baptismal font (a symbolic font) of the Holy Cross Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clockwork of the Holy Cross Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Candles at Holy Cross Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Timber framed storehouse at Open Air museum Mühlenhof, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Game reserve in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Nice reflection here --Podzemnik 05:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red Rock Canyon State Park, California. --King of Hearts 05:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South Tufa, Mono Lake. --King of Hearts 05:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gull Lake, California. --King of Hearts 05:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grant Lake, California. --King of Hearts 05:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Silver Lake, California. --King of Hearts 05:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
     Comment - This looks like a possible FP to me. Several of your pictures of this lake do. Pick the one you like best and nominate it. -- Ikan Kekek 05:57, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
     Comment I just want to second Ikan’s suggestion. --Aristeas 09:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
     Comment Yes, FPC, perhaps dehaze/clarity rear of photo Seven Pandas 13:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination t Andrew's Cathedral Italian Cloister Garden, Glasgow --Podzemnik 05:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Nice. --XRay 07:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Andrew's Cathedral, Glasgow, Scotland --Podzemnik 05:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Andrew's Cathedral, Glasgow, Scotland --Podzemnik 05:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 07:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Front view of the St Andrew's Cathedral, Glasgow --Podzemnik 05:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 07:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Front view of the St Andrew's Cathedral, Glasgow --Podzemnik 05:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boy riding a motorcycle in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. Front view --Basile Morin 02:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Great! --Podzemnik 05:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River bank of the island of Don Khon with stilt wooden houses, in sunshine at golden hour, seen from Don Det (Si Phan Don, Laos). --Basile Morin 02:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. You make feel like going to Laos --Podzemnik 05:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
    You should, it's really worth it :-) Thank you -- Basile Morin 06:57, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kapok, fruit of Ceiba pentandra (white silk-cotton tree) without its shell, on a branch with leaves. Kapok is a vegetal fiber, which usually falls from the tree when it is dry. But here only the outer part left the branch, while the inner part remained attached like a silk pear. Shot a sunny day with a blue sky background, in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 02:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plexippus petersi (jumping spider), male, on a human finger, at golden hour in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. Appromimately 7 mm (0.28 in) diameter legs included. Focus stacking from 9 pictures, handheld camera with macro lens. --Basile Morin 02:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ambigram Body / Yoga. Mirror symmetry (horizontal axis) --Basile Morin 02:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support I'm not sure exactly what's the policy but wouldn't SVG version be more useful? Good quality anyway --Podzemnik 05:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
    It's 6000 x 5000 px, 30 Mo, so it's large enough for any use, even a giant banner or a poster. Here on Commons we don't request to publish our photographs in RAW or TIFF, so I think it should be the same with PNG vs SVG (and PNG is still better than JPG). Personally, I don't like the interface for the SVG files on Commons because it's never clear high resolution files are available, and how to download them. See also in the archives ambigram entrée - sortie. Thanks for your review -- Basile Morin 06:57, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Village of Lamayouro, Ladakh, India --Bgag 01:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Woman carrying bricks in the village of Lamayouro, Ladakh, India --Bgag 01:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House in the village of Lamayouro, Ladakh, India --Bgag 01:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lamayuru Monastery, Ladakh, India --Bgag 01:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chortens in Lamayuru Monastery, Ladakh, India --Bgag 01:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Stephen Cathedral of Cahors, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 00:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    I think that the sky needs denoising. You were probably also to close to the tower, after perspective correction looks a bit awkward --Poco a poco 10:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
    I withdraw this image. Tournasol7 15:14, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of the building at Rue du Porche in Clairvaux-d'Aveyron, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sesriem Canyon, Sossusvlei, Namibia --Poco a poco 22:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Děčín-CZ, church: kostel svatého Václava a Blažeje --Michielverbeek 06:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clockwork of the Holy Cross Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Photo could have been sharpened in its entirety. But good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
     Done Thank you. I've uploaded a sharpened photograph. --XRay 16:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bells of Holy Cross Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but the sunlight from outside spoils the composition a bit (but not too much) --Michielverbeek 07:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dutch Vineyard De Kleine Schorre in Dreischor (Province of Zeeland) --Tuxyso 20:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Needs cleanup of dust spots --Poco a poco 21:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
     Done, please take another look, Poco a poco --Tuxyso 19:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hall of the Moskovsky Railway station in Nizhny Novgorod --AlexTref871 07:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose sorry, not sharp enough --MB-one 12:34, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pedestrian underpass between platforms and to the Moskovsky railway station in Nizhny Novgorod --AlexTref871 07:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp enough for me --Michielverbeek 07:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Philip Ross during Honda press conference at IAA 2017 --MB-one 13:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline The light coditions are not good and it does not give me the feeling this photo is all about Philip Ross and Honda. I just see a man probably talking about a car. --Michielverbeek 07:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Conveyor belt exchange station at surface mine Schleenhain --GPSLeo 22:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Villa in Berlin-Lankwitz --MB-one 10:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Buses in Budapest --Billy69150 10:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
    Should be denoised --MB-one 13:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Portsmouth_Spinnaker_Tower_(2016).jpg

• Nomination Spinnaker Tower, Portsmouth --Martinvl 21:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I disagree - it has many red and blue CAs and tilts heavily to the left --DeFacto 19:27, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per DeFacto.--Peulle 10:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Paris Orlando 16:29, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Weaver_Bird_Nest.jpg

• Nomination Weaver bird nest of dry grass. --Prosthetic Head 12:26, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support - Good quality, IMO. Enough of the nest is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 12:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose but too dark. should id species too--Charlesjsharp 14:40, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for the feedback, it was being visited by Southern Masked Weavers (Ploceus velatus), so it's safe to say that's the species. In my opinion the brightness is ok and increasing it harms the quality of the background. --Prosthetic Head 15:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  thanks for id. If you could lighten shadows, that wouldn't affect background. Nests are usually not made with dead (dry) grass. Are you sure birds were visiting this nest? --Charlesjsharp 17:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  @Charlesjsharp: Have lightened, not sure which version I prefer personally - what do you think? Nest was landed on - can't be sure it was in active use as bird I saw didn't carry anything in. Nests green when made then dry out?--Prosthetic Head 23:31, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support for me it's a QI --Stepro 01:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support for me too. The nest (the important item) is fine, and the surroundings provide a nice background. --Aristeas 09:32, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Paris Orlando 16:28, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

File:NN_Moskovsky_Railway_Station_01-2019_02.jpg

• Nomination The city train of the Priokskaya line on the platform No. 5 of the Moscow railway station in Nizhny Novgorod. --AlexTref871 13:07, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 17:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Noisy sky and at least two dust spots to be removed. --C messier 15:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Neutral The sky is OK (some noise is inevitable here and IMHO much better than too much de-noising), overall quality is OK, however, please remove the two prominent dust spots which C Messier has already marked (thanks!). If the dust spots are removed, I would support this image. --Aristeas 10:04, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  • @Aristeas: spots will be removed. --AlexTref871 (talk) 13:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The focus is on the train on the left. The rest is out of focus. --Ermell 20:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Paris Orlando 16:28, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Turnov,_stadhuis_op_het_Náměstí_Českého_ráje_Dm123596-5581_IMG_7101_2018-08-07_19.34.jpg

• Nomination Turnov Liberecký kraj-CZ, stadhuis op het Náměstí Českého ráje --Michielverbeek 22:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Visible, uncorrected barrel distortion. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Please realize the square in the front is not flat --Michielverbeek 19:54, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  

 Comment I do not mean the square. I mean the tower. Same issue as with the other image of a tower. No surprise since barrel distortion is a common construction limitation of wide-angle zoom lenses. However it's not difficult to correct with various software and mostly auto-corrected nowadays for in-camera jpegs. --Johannes Robalotoff 06:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

I'm not seeing it. What should I look for? -- Ikan Kekek 23:59, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

The tower is upright, but it is bent a bit like a banana, but of course not as strong as such a fruit. Therefore the center of its top is not exactly above the center of its base, but farther right on the image. I found it disturbing, especially when looking at the top with clock and roof, but obviously others do not find it that severe. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:16, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining. I still can't see it, though. -- Ikan Kekek 06:05, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Looks OK to me --Palauenc05 13:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support The barrel distortion is there, yes, I see it at the left edge of the tower, but it is unobtrusive here. However, @Michielverbeek, why not correct the distortion anyway? That should be rather easy! Do you need/want a little help? No offence, just wanting to help, --Aristeas 09:58, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough for me.--Fischer.H 10:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I have made  Donea small perspective improvement and hope I have reduced the distortion a little bit. At the same time I realize I don't have a superior camera --Michielverbeek 19:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  

 Comment Oh, you should not worry about your camera in this respect. There are zoom lenses which cost twice the price of your camera and still have rather strong barrel distortion at the wide end. The perspective correction didn't remove it, because perspective correction will not make bent lines straight. You need a special correction for barrel distortion. But anyway, as most people didn't feel that it's disturbing here, it looks as if the image will be promoted. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:31, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 15:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)