Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 13 2016
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Defunct former forge on Brockweg, Winklern, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coast of Ceuta, Spain --Poco a poco 03:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plage des Conches Longeville-sur-Mer (Pays de la Loire), Vendée.- France.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Brown Dwarf Turban, Turbo bruneus --Llez 18:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument zone monastery ruin Limburg an der Haardt. --F. Riedelio 16:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Pity the lights right below, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument zone Hambach Castle. --F. Riedelio 16:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Please have a llok to your EXIF data. May be and old release of Lightroom? --XRay 18:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument zone Hambach Castle. --F. Riedelio 16:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurasian wigeon in Sakai, Osaka. --Laitche 16:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice!--Famberhorst 16:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea.
--Famberhorst 16:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea.
-
- Nomination Benizelos house, Athens. --C messier 15:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cape Skink - Trachylepis capensis. Close-up on purple Aster flowers. --Prosthetic Head 14:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose The flowers are overexposed. --C messier 15:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Daurian redstart (female) in Sakai, Osaka. --Laitche 14:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Prosthetic Head 15:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Female Sugar Bird. --Prosthetic Head 14:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oversharpened ... see for example the granularity around the beak --Cccefalon 15:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cypripedium macranthon (by Anatoly Mikhaltsov). Kruusamägi 13:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 21:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cross section of Eleutherococcus sp stem (by Anatoly Mikhaltsov). Kruusamägi 13:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Laitche 14:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saltwater Rotifer among Spirulina (by Anatoly Mikhaltsov). Kruusamägi 13:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent micrograph --Prosthetic Head 14:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Slovenia, Ljubljana, Grand Hotel Union at Miklošičeva cesta --Berthold Werner 09:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shinaria Beach (Σχοινάρια), Finikas, Crete --Uoaei1 09:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Sharp enough, just a good photo, a Q1one --Michielverbeek 09:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palm beach of Preveli with the mouth of Megalopotamos river, Crete --Uoaei1 09:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Medical X-ray of flat feet --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 21:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saints Nicholas and Francis Xavier church in Otmuchów 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saints Nicholas and Francis Xavier church in Otmuchów 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Otmuchów Castle --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 13:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Otmuchów Castle --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alliance coat of arms of Giech and Förtsch each with a four-Tree sample on the side --Ermell 08:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, however a bit dark --Uoaei1 09:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Comment
I agree. Uploaded a brighter version.Thank you.--Ermell 09:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Temporary bridge on the Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed railway in Breitengüßbach --Ermell 08:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interlocking building on Breitengüßbach Bahnhof --Ermell 08:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ouderkerk ad Amstel-NL, view to a water --Michielverbeek 07:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ouderkerk ad Amstel-NL, drawing bridge --Michielverbeek 07:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tchaikovsky Concert Hall in Moscow --Florstein 07:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Sharp enough, good perspective a Q1one --Michielverbeek 07:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Culture Centre of the Russian Armed Forces in Moscow --Florstein 07:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta.
-
- Nomination SNAV Sardegna (ship, 1989) in the harbour of Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Okinawa, Japan: Elevation signs as part of the Tsunami warning system. The red colour indicates, that this zone is extremly risky in case of a tsunami warning situation. --Cccefalon 05:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alishan, Taiwan: Steam locomotive No. 24 of Alishan Forest Railway at Jhaoping Station --Cccefalon 05:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Beautiful motive. Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination London, UK: The 30 St Mary Axe office building-skyscraper, popularly known as the Gherkin. Seen from 99 Bishopsgate --Cccefalon 05:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Naha, Okinawa, Japan: A Toyota Ambulance in Nago. Photo taken on the parking lot of Nago Civic Hall --Cccefalon 05:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment For me the car is too bright. Look at the trade mark and at the blue writing. -- Spurzem 11:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Done Ich habe Deinen Vorschlag mal aufgegriffen, die Mitteltöne und Höhen abgesenkt sowie die Luminanz von Rot und Blau verringert. Das sollte jetzt Deinen Vorstellungen entsprechen. --Cccefalon 18:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Gut; jetzt gefällt's mir. -- Spurzem 20:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paginatan, Ranau, Sabah: An abondoned truck in Paginatan --Cccefalon 05:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Site of Túcume, Peru --Bgag 05:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sign of the Museo de Sitio of Túcume, Peru --Bgag 05:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reeds and lantern at the Kurpark on Parkweg, Krumpendorf, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Health clinic on Parkweg, Krumpendorf, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window at the health clinic on Parkweg, Krumpendorf, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bench at the Kurpark on Parkweg, Krumpendorf, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the Kurpark at a bridge cabin in the Parkbad on Pamperlallee, Krumpendorf, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Huizen-NL, church --Michielverbeek 23:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amsterdam-NL, churchtower (de Zuiderkerk) --Michielverbeek 23:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall at night, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 18:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Distortion needs to be more carefully fixed: the photo is slightly tilted to the left, and the white lines between the windows at the center are also slightly bent.--Rftblr 21:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Fixed It's fixed and IMO OK (now). Thanks for your advice. --XRay 18:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Support Looks like good quality to me --Prosthetic Head 14:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Support Good quality! --Rftblr 18:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former town hall in Deidesheim --F. Riedelio 13:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment
Needs some perspective correction IMO--Ermell 20:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment
Unfortunately not possible. --F. Riedelio 16:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. I find it does not need perspective correction.--Rftblr 19:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Former town hall in Deidesheim --F. Riedelio 13:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Photographer is reflected in horse eye. --F. Riedelio 13:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Slovenia, Ljubljana, House at Prešeren Square --Berthold Werner 12:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment Could use a +0.25 EV exposure compensation without blowing anything. --Rftblr 15:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Done --Berthold Werner 16:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Rftblr 19:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Slovenia, Ljubljana, House at Prešeren Square --Berthold Werner 12:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eiffel Tower in Paris, France --Rijinatwiki 08:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Saint George on the Rocks, Athens. --C messier 14:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winnie the Pooh at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 12:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality: Head is overexposed, table is tilted, Author is missing. --F. Riedelio 16:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Greenhouse whitefly larva (by Anatoly Mikhaltsov). Kruusamägi 12:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Prosthetic Head 15:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gibbaeum nebrownii (by Anatoly Mikhaltsov). Kruusamägi 12:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Prosthetic Head 15:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Transitional Corridor between Pushkinskaya and Tverskaya Stations of Moscow Subway --Florstein 07:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cathedral of Seville, Seville, Spain --Poco a poco 13:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chipiona Lighthouse, Spain --Poco a poco 13:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality: Tilt a bit to the right; perspective distortion, in particular in the picture edges. --F. Riedelio 16:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arbatskaya Station of Moscow Subway --Florstein 09:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frosted sprig of oak (Quercus robur). Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
--Famberhorst 08:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Frosted sprig of oak (Quercus robur). Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
-
- Nomination Tank barge Rhoen III in Cologne. --Rolf H. 07:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Comment Generally good, but in full resolution is full of noise reduction artifacts and not very detailed. --C messier 15:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination You are right, I don´t find the original. --Rolf H. 05:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Image series of the sufferings of Jesus Christ, stations 3,4 and 5 in the Church in Gunzendorf --Ermell 09:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion The white wall looks a little bit too much to PS brush tool, especially the transition to the shadow. Also, the perspective needs some enhancements. You could use perspective warp for this task. --Cccefalon 15:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC) Done
Thanks for the review and hint. I usually try to work on the perspective by hand trying to match the grid but perspective warp is a bit easier. Next time I will take only one painting alone which might be not so complycated.--Ermell 23:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Much better. --Cccefalon 05:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Soodla jõgi. 03.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Soodla river (by Aleksandr Abrosimov). Kruusamägi 09:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much noise reduction, has eaten fine detail. --C messier 15:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with C messier. --Rftblr 22:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 22:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Kamchatka_Brown_Bear_near_Dvuhyurtochnoe_on_2015-07-23.png
[edit]- Nomination A Kamchatka Brown Bear (wild) near Dvuhyurtochnoe Kamchatka taken on July 23rd, 2015. --Rftblr 17:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Wrong format: photos should be jp(e)g, not PNG --A.Savin 23:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment This batch of photos is my first nomination to QI, I checked them according to the Commons:Image guidelines. If jp(e)g is a requirement for quality photos, why is this not stated there? If it is necessary I will of course retract these nominations, make jpg versions, and make new nominations. --User:rftblr 7:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version. I will do this for my other candidates as well. Do I have to retract the PNG version from QI and nominate the JPG version? --User:rftblr 8:03, 8 February 2016(UTC)
- Comment you can keep it as it is, in fact, it´s the same picture. --Hubertl 08:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version. I will do this for my other candidates as well. Do I have to retract the PNG version from QI and nominate the JPG version? --User:rftblr 8:03, 8 February 2016(UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 08:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Can you explain, A.Savin, why this picture should be uploaded as jpg and not in png? --Hubertl 10:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I also do not understand this request. Our QIC rules explicetly suggest a resolution for Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF). So what is the problem with png (which also is a FREE format)? --Cccefalon 10:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- See my comment at #File:Mischek_Tower_Vienna_from_W_on_2013-06-14.png. --A.Savin 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- You might start a request for changing the rules and find enough supporters for such a motion. But as long as our rules allow png, you cannot just start a mass oppose for png format images of user RftBlr. Sorry to say so, but it is kind of disruptive. --Cccefalon 09:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- +1 -- Smial 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- You might start a request for changing the rules and find enough supporters for such a motion. But as long as our rules allow png, you cannot just start a mass oppose for png format images of user RftBlr. Sorry to say so, but it is kind of disruptive. --Cccefalon 09:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- See my comment at #File:Mischek_Tower_Vienna_from_W_on_2013-06-14.png. --A.Savin 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I also do not understand this request. Our QIC rules explicetly suggest a resolution for Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF). So what is the problem with png (which also is a FREE format)? --Cccefalon 10:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Very good for me. -- Spurzem 08:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good work. -- Smial 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support A beautiful, well balanced and composed picture. I see no reason for the objection the grounds of format, in fact many consider PNG to be a 'freer' format than JPG (patent concerns). --Prosthetic Head 12:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 09:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Ares_Tower_Vienna_from_SW_on_2015-07-10.png
[edit]- Nomination The Ares Tower in Vienna seen from the south-west on July 10th, 2015. --Rftblr 17:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality although photographs should rather be saved as JPG. --Code 17:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Wrong format: photos should be jp(e)g, not PNG --A.Savin 23:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment This batch of photos is my first nomination to QI, I checked them according to the Commons:Image guidelines. If jp(e)g is a requirement for quality photos, why is this not stated there? If it is necessary I will of course retract these nominations, make jpg versions, and make new nominations. --User:rftblr 7:25, 8 February 2016(UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 10:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version. --User:rftblr 19:34, 8 February 2016(UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 08:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support certainly well above the average quality -- Smial 11:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Sharp photo, good perspective a Q1one and a warm welcome to Rftblr --Michielverbeek 08:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Michielverbeek Thanks for the welcome! --Rftblr 10:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 09:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)