Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 13 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Soodla jõgi. 03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Soodla river (by Aleksandr Abrosimov). Kruusamägi 09:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much noise reduction, has eaten fine detail. --C messier 15:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with C messier. --Rftblr 22:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 22:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Kamchatka_Brown_Bear_near_Dvuhyurtochnoe_on_2015-07-23.png

[edit]

  • Nomination A Kamchatka Brown Bear (wild) near Dvuhyurtochnoe Kamchatka taken on July 23rd, 2015. --Rftblr 17:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Wrong format: photos should be jp(e)g, not PNG --A.Savin 23:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment This batch of photos is my first nomination to QI, I checked them according to the Commons:Image guidelines. If jp(e)g is a requirement for quality photos, why is this not stated there? If it is necessary I will of course retract these nominations, make jpg versions, and make new nominations. --User:rftblr 7:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version. I will do this for my other candidates as well. Do I have to retract the PNG version from QI and nominate the JPG version? --User:rftblr 8:03, 8 February 2016(UTC)
      •  Comment you can keep it as it is, in fact, it´s the same picture. --Hubertl 08:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 08:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Can you explain, A.Savin, why this picture should be uploaded as jpg and not in png? --Hubertl 10:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 Comment I also do not understand this request. Our QIC rules explicetly suggest a resolution for Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF). So what is the problem with png (which also is a FREE format)? --Cccefalon 10:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
See my comment at #File:Mischek_Tower_Vienna_from_W_on_2013-06-14.png. --A.Savin 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
You might start a request for changing the rules and find enough supporters for such a motion. But as long as our rules allow png, you cannot just start a mass oppose for png format images of user RftBlr. Sorry to say so, but it is kind of disruptive. --Cccefalon 09:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
+1 -- Smial 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good for me. -- Spurzem 08:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good work. -- Smial 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support A beautiful, well balanced and composed picture. I see no reason for the objection the grounds of format, in fact many consider PNG to be a 'freer' format than JPG (patent concerns). --Prosthetic Head 12:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Ares_Tower_Vienna_from_SW_on_2015-07-10.png

[edit]

  • Nomination The Ares Tower in Vienna seen from the south-west on July 10th, 2015. --Rftblr 17:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality although photographs should rather be saved as JPG. --Code 17:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Wrong format: photos should be jp(e)g, not PNG --A.Savin 23:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment This batch of photos is my first nomination to QI, I checked them according to the Commons:Image guidelines. If jp(e)g is a requirement for quality photos, why is this not stated there? If it is necessary I will of course retract these nominations, make jpg versions, and make new nominations. --User:rftblr 7:25, 8 February 2016(UTC)
      •  Comment add a jpg for previewing purposes. rftblr --Hubertl 08:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 10:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version. --User:rftblr 19:34, 8 February 2016(UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 08:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support certainly well above the average quality -- Smial 11:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp photo, good perspective a Q1one and a warm welcome to Rftblr --Michielverbeek 08:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)