Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 06 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Der_Nesselsee_im_Naturschutzgebiet_Nesselgrund_5.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Nesselsee ("Nettle Lake") in Nesselgrund ("Nettle Ground") nature reserve --Plozessor 04:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.Too bad the metadata is missing. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC
The camera metadata? It's a panorama, ICE doesn't copy all the details. But the metadata is identical to "Der Nesselsee im Naturschutzgebiet Nesselgrund.jpg". --Plozessor 05:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 Comment You can copy the metadata of one of the images used for stitching into the finished panorama. For example with exiftool, but there are probably also numerous tools for clicking with the mouse instead of using the command line. --Smial 12:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's a stitching error on the left side. --Tournasol7 11:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Oops! Thx for spotting, cropped it away. --Plozessor 13:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Thanks! Good quality now for me.--Tournasol7 08:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

File:An_der_Fränkischen_Saale_südlich_der_Südbrücke_in_Bad_Kissingen_(Panorama).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Meadow next to Franconian Saale river south of Bad Kissingen --Plozessor 05:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose I am so sorry for declining this one. I like it very much. It consider to use it as my wallpaper but unfortunately the clouds are a bit too blown out. --Hillopo2018 12:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
    @Hillopo2018: Uploaded a new version, please have a look! --Plozessor 14:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Thi 11:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support OK and QI for me. --Milseburg 11:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Car_Catwalk,_BAS_24,_Brussels_(P1170213-RR)_(cropped).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Car Catwalk at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 13:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose I don't like the composition, too much floor. Sorry --Hillopo2018 11:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done cropped --MB-one 14:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good (now)! --Plozessor 05:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
  •  SupportLooks ok to me.--Ermell 21:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Fischteich_im_Wildpark_Schloss_Tambach.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Fish pond in Tambach deer park (Panorama) --Plozessor 05:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Alignment: Looks slightly curved upwards to me. --Milseburg 14:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
  • @Milseburg: You're right, there was some distortion in the panorama. Uploaded a new version, please check. --Plozessor 19:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Better, but please ckeck seams and hard transitions in the sky. --Milseburg 15:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Better again. I am not an expert on CAs. But aren't there some on the branches near the sky to the right? --Milseburg 13:52, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
I'm unsure about the purple tint of the branches and leaves in front of the sky. --Milseburg 20:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
  • @Milseburg: Sorry, but I was unable to locate a single purple pixel in the image. I guess it's an optical illusion with the blue pixels from the sky and the dark green or brown pixels from the trees merging. But I now lowered the saturation of certain shades of blue which should reduce the effect, please have another look. --Plozessor 05:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Don’t want to interrupt your discussion, but IMHO it’s really good now. Thank you for the improvements! --Aristeas 16:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI, I think now. --Milseburg 18:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)