Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 03 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:FIS_Skilanglauf-Weltcup_in_Dresden_PR_CROSSCOUNTRY_StP_8159_LR10_by_Stepro-2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination v.li.: Katharina Hennig (GER, Deutschland), Elisabeth Schicho (GER, Deutschland); Platz 6 --Stepro 02:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 08:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm asking for review. It's a portrait in natural light and I'm able to count the little hairs below her lips. --Stepro 05:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It may be the light that's a bit harsh (overexposure?), but it does indeed appear a bit unfocused.--Peulle 07:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Acuity (Sharpness) is for me not the issue. It was overexposed (1-2 EV) in colour, so it´s burned out in b&W. Natural Light with too hard shadows, too.
  •  Oppose Too low DOF. --Smial 14:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 13:06, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

File:FIS_Skilanglauf-Weltcup_in_Dresden_PR_CROSSCOUNTRY_StP_7137_LR10_by_Stepro.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tatiana Aleshina (RUS, Russland) --Stepro 02:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough. Sorry. --Ermell 08:15, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm asking for review. It's a sportswoman in motion. --Stepro 05:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I like it and think it´s sharp enough for sportive shots. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Sportfoto mit idealer Schärfe und Schärfentiefe. Das Kontra ist Nonsens. --Ralf Roletschek 06:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Good enough. Some careful denoising would be nice. --Smial 14:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough and I prefer the light amount of noise (which is no chroma noise at all) over trying to denoise and possibly also oversharpening it which would ruin the image. --Granada 08:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ermell --Poco a poco 21:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 13:06, 2 February 2018 (UTC)