Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 28 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Old Gang Smelt Mill – a bit unsharp towards the right edge but I only had a point-and-shoot with me to catch this beautiful lighting --Kreuzschnabel 22:23, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality IMO. --Halavar 22:46, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fjälliften, a small, old ski lift in Ljungdalen (Berg municipality, Jämtland county). --ArildV 20:23, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. But even in Sweden, you don´t have enough snow for skiing. --Hubertl 20:36, 25 December 2014 (UTC) Thank for review. The snow depth is about 30 cm in Härjedalen, very low to be here but the big ski resorts is open thanks to snowmaking and cold weather. I think Åre ( further north, but closer to the Norwegian coast and the Gulf Stream) have bigger problem. --ArildV 20:58, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mushrooms in decline. Location, The Famberhorst. Shaggy parasol (Chlorophyllum rhacodes, synonym: Macrolepiota rhacodes).
Famberhorst 17:12, 25 December 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. Its good, to see those mushroom, when they are not perfect! --Hubertl 17:41, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Mushrooms in decline. Location, The Famberhorst. Shaggy parasol (Chlorophyllum rhacodes, synonym: Macrolepiota rhacodes).
-
- Nomination Passenger ship on the river Spree, Berlin. --Code 16:33, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
* Comment can you lighten up the dark areas? it will be QI for me then. --Hubertl 17:41, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Done --Code 22:15, 25 December 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Steindy 23:53, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Passenger ship on the river Spree, Berlin. --Code 16:33, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sleigh with Christmas decoration --F. Riedelio 15:39, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Steindy 23:53, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brilliant Christmas star on an archway --F. Riedelio 15:39, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI imo.--ArildV 15:58, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Christmas tree decorations" --F. Riedelio 15:39, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Even if the neck is not very sharp, QI to me --DKrieger 18:08, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pramen Lužická Nysa mezi Smržovze y Nová Ves nad Nisou --Ralf Roletschek 14:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 15:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Střední Smržovka, Vlakové nádraží --Ralf Roletschek 14:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Steindy 00:06, 26 December 2014 (UTC) (Ralf makes a selfie ;-)
-
- Nomination Střední Smržovka Dům číslo 62, postavený v roce 1750 --Ralf Roletschek 14:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Im Prinzip. A bisserl den Sturz korrigieren? Wäre nett! --Hubertl 15:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sáňkařská dráha Střední Smržovka --Ralf Roletschek 14:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline The curve is totally overexposed. --Steindy 00:06, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kõnnu Suursoo (by Rutake). Kruusamägi 11:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Wonderful. --Hockei 12:55, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kakerdaja Bog (by Rutake). Kruusamägi 11:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Very good. --Hockei 12:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Loode oak forest in spring (by Margus6). Kruusamägi 11:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 16:02, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Bartholomew's Church in Topola 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 10:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Bartholomew's Church in Topola 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 12:43, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Bartholomew's Church in Topola 4 --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 12:42, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Bartholomew's Church in Topola 5 --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Tilted a little bit CCW. --Halavar 10:19, 25 December 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 20:29, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Support Good now. --Halavar 21:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Region of Búðahraun, Vesturland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 09:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 10:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reynisfjara, Suðurland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 09:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:33, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The western park entrance of the Castle of Restinclières. Prades-le-Lez, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 09:23, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:33, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seljalandsfoss, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 08:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:33, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eldfell, Heimaey, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 08:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 09:32, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Icelandic sheep, Grábrók, Vesturland, Iceland --Poco a poco 08:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 10:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Haukadalur valley from Laugarfjall, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 08:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 10:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ósvör maritime museum, Bolungarvík, Vestfirðir, Iceland. --Poco a poco 08:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:33, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Kuen Cheng High School --Cccefalon 08:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Penampang, Sabah: Joseph Pairin Kitingan in traditional Dusun costume. He is flanked by Chief Minister Musa Aman (left) and Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation of Malaysia, Maximus Johnity Ongkili. --Cccefalon 08:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me --Halavar 10:21, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kota Belud, Sabah: A small lake along the Tuaran-Kota Belud Road --Cccefalon 08:35, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good and nice --Christian Ferrer 09:31, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mushrooms in development. Location, The Famberhorst. Shaggy parasol (Chlorophyllum rhacodes, synonym: Macrolepiota rhacodes).
Famberhorst 05:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:15, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Mushrooms in development. Location, The Famberhorst. Shaggy parasol (Chlorophyllum rhacodes, synonym: Macrolepiota rhacodes).
-
- Nomination Bridge carrying Pennsylvania Route 54 over the Susquehanna River. Jakec 02:29, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Fortuna by Johannes Benk (1896) at Hofburg Palace in Vienna. --Hubertl 01:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 06:56, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The upper Lago de Fusine, Fusine di Valroma, Tarvisio, Friuli --Hubertl 01:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion I love these shots.--Famberhorst 06:02, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agrarflieger Gehling PLZ-106 AR Kruk beim Oldtimer Fliegertreffen, Flugfeld Hahnweide 2013. By User:Ritchyblack --Smial 01:46, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good --Christian Ferrer 06:56, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Michaels Mount, Marazion in Cornwall UK. By User:Fuzzypiggy --Nev1 23:18, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Bautiful and impressive! Good quality. --Steindy 14:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jardim do Morro, Porto, Portugal. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 09:20, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Interesting study. Yes, there are some pidgeons with low DOF ;-) --Hubertl 12:52, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Freedom Square in Tallinn. Kruusamägi 09:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 22:04, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Malarrif lighthouse, Vesturland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC) Comment Description is wrong, no lighthouse visible (I guess is behind) --C messier 18:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Done: Description, category and file name updated Poco a poco 19:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC) - Review Neutral IMHO, the landscape is a bit blurry (maybe it's out of focus). --C messier 11:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
I agree with C messier. Mattbuck 23:54, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination: Malarrif lighthouse, Vesturland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC) Comment Description is wrong, no lighthouse visible (I guess is behind) --C messier 18:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Dome_of_S.Peter_in_night.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Dome of S.Peter in the night --Livioandronico2013 11:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Good but tilted in ccw direction Poco a poco 11:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Done Thanks Diego --Livioandronico2013 11:38, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
The top crop is now too tight Poco a poco 11:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
See now Diego --Livioandronico2013 11:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC) - Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Too many overexposed parts. -Kadellar 16:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Very good for me. -- Spurzem 12:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kadellar, and to many jpeg compression artifacts.--Jebulon 18:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Ok for me.--Hubertl 16:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Code 18:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Livioandronico2013 09:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Cortaderia December 2014-2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Pampas Grass (Cortaderia selloana). Gulbenkian Garden, Lisboa. -- Alvesgaspar 19:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- There is an existing category for this place, please use it before a promotion --Christian Ferrer 16:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Oppose until it’s fixed.- To put photos of plants or animals in the category of the garden where you took these photos is very relevant and essential if you know it. A garden or a park contains plants, a category for this garden contains images of these plants. Logic, isn’t it? I have even been kind enough to you to find this category. It's one of the rules here for all of us, when a file has the adequate information so it must be correctly categorized accordingly. (final comments from me for this nomination, maybe see you later on your next nominations…) --Christian Ferrer 20:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- I respectfully disagree and have inserted what I consider to be a better category. The same solution was adopted for pictures in botanical gardens, like in here. You comment that we might see you in my next nominations sounds like a threat and is not elegant. Alvesgaspar 10:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- The creation of this category is a very good thing, I congratulate you for this initiative and congratulate even myself for my perceverance that bears its fruits. So I promise I'll follow with great attention all your future nominations for that continues this successful teamwork. Hope it's more elegant, and hope you will continue your effort your efforts on categorization of your images, see you soon Alvesgaspar --Christian Ferrer 12:22, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Question Two straws are overexposed. Can you fix it? --Steindy 10:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, they are overexposed but little can be done about it except making the white grey. But the trick won't bring the details back. Alvesgaspar 11:51, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 16:46, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose For me its disturbing, but I respect other votes. --Steindy 13:45, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The little overexposure can be fixed, the blackness can be brightened and the contrast can be reduced. From the raw-file it's no problem. Also a bit sharpening --Hockei 11:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Livioandronico2013 09:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Cotoneaster December 2014-1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Fruits and leaves of Cotoneaster lacteus -- Alvesgaspar 19:00, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Hubertl 00:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- There is an existing category for this place, please use it before a promotion --Christian Ferrer 16:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Oppose until it’s fixed.- To put photos of plants or animals in the category of the garden where you took these photos is very relevant and essential if you know it. A garden or a park contains plants, a category for this garden contains images of these plants. Logic, isn’t it? I have even been kind enough to you to find this category. It's one of the rules here for all of us, when a file has the adequate information so it must be correctly categorized accordingly. (final comments from me for this nomination, maybe see you later on your next nominations…) --Christian Ferrer 20:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- I respectfully disagree and have inserted what I consider to be a better category. The same solution was adopted for pictures in botanical gardens, like in here. You comment that we might see you in my next nominations sounds like a threat and is not elegant. Alvesgaspar 10:13, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- The creation of this category is a very good thing, I congratulate you for this initiative and congratulate even myself for my perceverance that bears its fruits. So I promise I'll follow with great attention all your future nominations for that continues this successful teamwork. Hope it's more elegant, and hope you will continue your effort your efforts on categorization of your images, see you soon Alvesgaspar --Christian Ferrer 12:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Christmas, this is the beginning of a long lasting friendship :-P --Hubertl 17:36, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. Yann 11:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Livioandronico2013 09:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Bamboo December 2014-1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Fishpole Bamboo. Gulbenkian Garden, Lisboa -- Alvesgaspar 19:00, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- There is an existing category for this place, please use it before a promotion --Christian Ferrer 16:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC) -- I'm sending it to CR.
- Not a good practise to use QIC to make a point! -- Alvesgaspar 18:26, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe but you nominated, I cite the nomination sentence : Fishpole Bamboo. Gulbenkian Garden, Lisboa. You took photos in this garden, I don't see why you'll be exempt from precisely categorize your photos. Why this category exist, if it's not for to put the images taken in it? And you're the first here that refers to something other than the nomination of this picture. --Christian Ferrer 18:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Oppose until it’s fixed.- To put photos of plants or animals in the category of the garden where you took these photos is very relevant and essential if you know it. A garden or a park contains plants, a category for this garden contains images of these plants. Logic, isn’t it? I have even been kind enough to you to find this category. It's one of the rules here for all of us, when a file has the adequate information so it must be correctly categorized accordingly. (final comments from me for this nomination, maybe see you later on your next nominations…) --Christian Ferrer 20:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- I respectfully disagree and have inserted what I consider to be a better category. The same solution was adopted for pictures in botanical gardens, like in here. You comment that we might see you in my next nominations sounds like a threat and is not elegant. Alvesgaspar 10:13, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- The creation of this category is a very good thing, I congratulate you for this initiative and congratulate even myself for my perceverance that bears its fruits. So I promise I'll follow with great attention all your future nominations for that continues this successful teamwork. Hope it's more elegant, and hope you will continue your effort your efforts on categorization of your images, see you soon Alvesgaspar --Christian Ferrer 12:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. Yann 11:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Livioandronico2013 09:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Viru_värav_-_lõuna-torn.jpg
[edit]- Nomination South tower of the Viru Gate, Tallinn. --Óðinn 04:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- OpposeOverexposed sky. --Iifar 18:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The lighting is poor and the crop too tight on the subject -- Alvesgaspar 12:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Unnatural perspective. -- Spurzem 22:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Livioandronico2013 09:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-21_MF_red_687_Deutsches_Museum_Flugwerft_Schleissheim_2014_01.jpg
[edit]File:Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 MF red 687 Deutsches Museum Flugwerft Schleissheim 2014 01.jpg
- Nomination Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 MF Fishbed (red 687, 1973). --Julian Herzog 20:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment Its explicitly forbidden to take pictures in this museum for publishing it under a free licence. Only for private purposes. --Hubertl 21:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC) --Hubertl 20:53, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- Really? :/ Thanks for the info. Julian Herzog 05:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support That's not a valid reason to decline here. --Yann 15:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment It should because this is an offense in germany. --Code 08:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Yann: , "check license" etc. is a guideline here for nominations and reviews. A pending no-nonsense DR by the uploader is slightly disturbing. –Be..anyone 02:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Be..anyone: - Please don´t give any vote in my name. Never! Bist grad ein bisserl übermotiviert? --Hubertl 03:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Possibly, but the rules some lines above say that converting "br" requires conversion into "o" or "s" to reflect the original reason of the "discuss". Maybe I misunderstood that, thanks for fixing it. Some abuse filter already whined when I tried to remove the older of your two timestamps. –Be..anyone 03:51, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Be..anyone: - Please don´t give any vote in my name. Never! Bist grad ein bisserl übermotiviert? --Hubertl 03:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Livioandronico2013 09:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Normalsegelapparat_Otto_Lilienthal_Deutsches_Museum_Flugwerft_Schleissheim_2014.jpg
[edit]File:Normalsegelapparat Otto Lilienthal Deutsches Museum Flugwerft Schleissheim 2014.jpg
- Nomination Normalsegelapparat by Otto Lilienthal at Deutsches Museum Flugwerft Schleissheim. --Julian Herzog 20:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Yann 20:56, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
I disagree, because its not permited to take pictures in this museum for publishing it under a free licence. --Hubertl 21:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC) - Support Not a valid reason to decline here. Yann 15:13, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Hausrecht ist Risiko des Fotografen, urheberrechtlich unbedenklich. --Ralf Roletschek 10:16, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Ist es nicht, siehe BGH, Urt. v. 17.12.2010, Az. V ZR 44/10. --Code 18:07, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Livioandronico2013 09:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
File:DLR_VFW-Fokker_614_ATTAS_project_Deutsches_Museum_Flugwerft_Schleissheim_2014_01_cockpit.jpg
[edit]File:DLR VFW-Fokker 614 ATTAS project Deutsches Museum Flugwerft Schleissheim 2014 01 cockpit.jpg
- Nomination DLR VFW-Fokker 614 (reg. D-ADAM) ATTAS cockpit. --Julian Herzog 20:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good image -- MJJR 20:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
I disagree, because its not permited to take pictures in this museum for publishing it under a free licence. --Hubertl 21:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC) - Support There is nothing here which can get a copyright. Yann 10:33, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment It's a matter of property, not copyright. If the owner forbids taking such photos it is an offense to take or publish them. --Code 09:19, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Livioandronico2013 09:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)