Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 25 2024
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Jiufen Old Street, Taiwan --Another Believer 04:32, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Overprocessed --Jakubhal 04:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jiufen Old Street, Taiwan --Another Believer 04:32, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not sharp enough --Jakubhal 04:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bosphorus Bridge, Istanbul, Turkey --Poco a poco 04:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination T2 line tram, Istanbul, Turkey --Poco a poco 04:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Victory Monument, Ankara, Turkey --Poco a poco 04:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Himeji Castle tower seen from the ruins of the Nishinomaru South Gate, Japan, October 2024 --Yasuo Hamashima 02:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barbed wire fence on hiking trail #106 in Magdalensberg, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zechnerkogel, seen from Magdalensberg hiking trail #106, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brushwood on hiking trail #106 in Magdalensberg, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brushwood on hiking trail #106 in Magdalensberg, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farmbuilding Oberpfandler on Magdalensberg Straße #12, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 02:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 02:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 02:38, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 1 --Jacek Halicki 02:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 2 --Jacek Halicki 02:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:26, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 3 --Jacek Halicki 02:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Botanical Garden Entrance, Rio de Janeiro. --Rjcastillo 02:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Renato Gaucho Footprint Plate. --Rjcastillo 02:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sports balls collection. --Rjcastillo 02:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pond, interior Parque Lage. --Rjcastillo 02:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jorginho's Footprints Plate. --Rjcastillo 02:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A long-tailed tit trying to catch a caterpillar. --Yasuo Hamashima 01:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Relief on former revenue house on Zheleznodorozhnaja Street, Vyborg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of Vyborg Pedagogical Institute building, Vyborg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination White buildings in Vyborg (round shop building and railway station building behind it), Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Martin church in Znin, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voiv., Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:56, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall tower in Znin, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:56, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Historic armoury in Neuss, Germany --A. Öztas 18:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion SiSwati: (missing text)Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Corvus monedula in Krefeld, Germany --A. Öztas 18:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 21:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --100Polar 23:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination D. dama in Düsseldorf, Germany --A. Öztas 18:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 21:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --100Polar 23:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Croatia, Šibenik, St. Barbara church - sv. Barbara --Berthold Werner 17:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose The top is blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 21:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fresco of the Flagellation of Christ (by Sailko) --Tzim78 16:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 19:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination More then 100.000 King Penguin breeding on Salisbury Plain, South Georgia --Virtual-Pano 16:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Nice quality and 100.000 units of wow-factor --100Polar 23:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inflorescence of woodland figwort (Scrophularia nodosa) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Rhön Mountains seen from the west, Hesse, Germany --Milseburg 12:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dibrova Reserve (by Elvira Koval2) --FBilula 11:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Below minimum size requirement. --Milseburg 12:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Low resolution and quality. Cables deviate the attention. --100Polar 00:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deer sculpture of the Oleny Bridge (by Игорь Гордеев) --FBilula 11:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tiasmyn canyon (by Ekaterina Polischuk) --FBilula 11:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --Tzim78 16:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Angel of the North, Gateshead --Mike Peel 11:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose subject slightly out of focus, sorry --Virtual-Pano 16:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Angel of the North, Gateshead --Mike Peel 11:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Steam Elephant replica, Beamish Museum --Mike Peel 11:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 10:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:34, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museo del Ejército, los Inválidos, París, Francia, 2022-10-29 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 10:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museo del Ejército, los Inválidos, París, Francia, 2022-10-29 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 10:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paris 8e - Église de la Madeleine - Le mariage de la Vierge (James Pradier) (by Romainbehar) --Sebring12Hrs 10:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Row of houses in Neuwerk, Rendsburg --MB-one 10:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Uzerche (Corrèze, France) - View of the historic center from the East bank of Vézère river --Benjism89 10:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:31, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BTM Bonfire in Munich --AuHaidhausen 09:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schloss Neuschwanstein (43 mm) --AuHaidhausen 09:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Painted in the Council Chamber in Münchner Residenz --AuHaidhausen 09:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue over a grave --Romainbehar 09:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dacia Sandero Stepway III in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 09:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow. Church of Tikhvin icon of Theotokos in Alekseyevskoe --Alexxx1979 09:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 09:05, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow. Monument to Vladimir the Great --Alexxx1979 09:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Olsztyn High Gate (Brama Wysoka) --Scotch Mist 08:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 00:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madonna & Child Mosaic at Olsztyn High Gate --Scotch Mist 08:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gazeta Olsztyńska Building in Olsztyn --Scotch Mist 08:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-AMG W214 53 Hybrid in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 07:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Renault 5 E-Tech Electric in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 07:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maasland Zuid Holland-NL, wondmill: the Dijkmolen --Michielverbeek 07:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 08:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maasland Zuid Holland-NL, windmill: molen De Drie Lelies --Michielverbeek 07:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 08:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maasland Zuid Holland-NL, churchtower (the Oude Kerk) --Michielverbeek 07:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maybachufer weekly market in Berlin Neukölln --Ermell 07:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maybachufer weekly market in Berlin Neukölln --Ermell 07:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maybachufer weekly market in Berlin Neukölln --Ermell 07:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maybachufer weekly market in Berlin Neukölln --Ermell 07:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maybachufer weekly market in Berlin Neukölln --Ermell 07:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Maurice church in Saint-Maurice, Nievre, France. --Tournasol7 06:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Peter church in Montapas, Nievre, France. --Tournasol7 06:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Upper part of the frontal facade of the Our Lady of Assumption church in Sainte-Marie, Nievre, France. --Tournasol7 06:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Saint-Franchy, Nievre, France. --Tournasol7 06:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Franchy church in Saint-Franchy, Nievre, France. --Tournasol7 06:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Right valve of a Sulcate Astarte, Astarte sulcata --Llez 05:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Château de l’Aile, 1 Grande Place, Vevey, Switzerland --Llez 05:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Château de l’Aile, 1 Grande Place, Vevey, Switzerland --Llez 05:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Collège de la Veveyse, 27 Rue du Torrent, Vevey, Switzerland --Llez 05:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
I disagree. Sorry, sky looks strange and overexposed to me.Please discuss.--Milseburg 12:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Info Another version with better sky --Llez 19:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC) Support Much better and good quality now. --Milseburg 20:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gompertshäuser Kreck --Plozessor 05:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Scuol-Motta Naluns, View from Motta Naluns on the surrounding Alps.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Scuol-Motta Naluns, View from Motta Naluns on the surrounding Alps.
-
- Nomination Val Sinestra, high seat for wildlife observation.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Val Sinestra, high seat for wildlife observation.
-
- Nomination Change of the guard, Anıtkabir, Ankara, Turkey --Poco a poco 04:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Walls of Ankara Castle, Ankara, Turkey --Poco a poco 04:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Süleymaniye Mosque, Istanbul, Turkey --Poco a poco 04:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bjarnarflag Geothermal Power Station and the acidic Blue Lake, Iceland --Jakubhal 04:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dimmuborgir lava field, Iceland --Jakubhal 04:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Walking path in Dimmuborgir lava field, Iceland --Jakubhal 04:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Budhist temple windows. 91, Primorsky avenue, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Красный 02:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door and windows of the Mikhail Nikolayevich palace. Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Красный 02:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jiufen Old Street, Taiwan --Another Believer 01:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Andersengrad (playground built as a mix of imaginary places from Hans Christian Andersen's tales), Sosnovy Bor, Russia. By User:Любовь Сафронова --Екатерина Борисова 23:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monrepos park, Vyborg, Russia. By User:Krimarka --Екатерина Борисова 23:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 16:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Presentation of the Saxon State Government (Third Kretschmer cabinet): Christian Piwarz (CDU), Minister for Finance --Sandro Halank 17:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 12:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cannon maintenance rooms of a battery of the Reef fort. Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Красный 14:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Needs better description, I don't understand what I'm looking at. --Benjism89 14:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Done. --Красный 02:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Thanks --Benjism89 10:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bay window of Mikhail Nikolayevich palace. Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Красный 14:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Arm at the bottom-left corner needs to be cropped out, otherwise good. --Benjism89 14:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Done. --Красный 02:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality now --Benjism89 10:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Olsztyn New Town Hall Façade Sculptures --Scotch Mist 08:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maasland Zuid Holland-NL, second drawbridge over the canal along the Kwakelweg --Michielverbeek 07:38, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aston Martin DBX in Filderstadt --Alexander-93 07:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bentley Continental GTC (4th gen.) in Böblingen --Alexander-93 07:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Echinoidea, Rio de Janeiro Aquarium. --Rjcastillo 03:10, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support limited DoF but essential parts in focus --Virtual-Pano 16:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jiufen Old Street, Taiwan --Another Believer 02:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Arteon R Shooting Brake in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 12:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 16:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Embraer KC-390 at Paris Air Show 2019 --MB-one 12:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 16:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Intercession in Buchach, Ternopil region, Ukraine. --Rbrechko 20:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Crops left and right should be improved --Poco a poco 02:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Done Thank you. I deployed new version. --Rbrechko 13:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blackfriars Railway Bridge across the Thames, London --Mike Peel 18:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Right side leaning in --Poco a poco 02:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 09:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Prudhomat (Lot, France) - St Louis collegiate church of Castelnau-Bretenoux castle - A seat in the choir, with a misericord and two carved armrests --Benjism89 08:10, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mosaic work at Sri Sri Shitalnath Swami Garden Temple, Gouribari --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:48, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Lower part is too dark. I'd suggest to use a linear brightness gradient during raw conversion to achieve consistent brightness across the image. --Plozessor 04:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rowing at Rabindra Sarobar --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:44, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Leaning out on the left. Also foreground (the boat) is overcontrasted while the background is hazy. Also not too sharp overall. --Plozessor 04:03, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Terracotta ornamentation, Maa Phire Elo (Durga Museum), Rabindra Sarobar --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:40, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective. I suggest to leave the vertical perspective (do not make the verticals vertical) but fix the horizontal one at least (skew the lower right corner a bit downward so that the horizontal lines are horizontal). --Plozessor 04:03, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Entrance of Sudha Car Museum --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:28, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Taipei Botanical Garden, Taiwan --Another Believer 03:20, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Marko Kahanets grave, Koropets, Ternopil region, Ukraine. --Rbrechko 00:18, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Paris 8e - Petit Palais - Jardin - Entrée ouest - Renommée gauche (Émile Peynot) (by Romainbehar) --Sebring12Hrs 00:10, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Hartheu-Spanner an einer Kleeblume --Romzig 22:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Hartheu-Spanner an einer Kleeblume --Romzig 22:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Charleroi (Belgique) - Université du Travail Paul Pastur - Bâtiment Gramme vu depuis la boulevard Solvay --Jmh2o 20:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Eight-wheeled Mercedes-Benz Arocs with Meiller dumper --MB-one 14:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Massey Ferguson 6485 Dyna 6 --JoachimKohler-HB 11:33, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Peter and Paul church, Sestroretsk (by Сергей Шмидт СПБ) --FBilula 12:40, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bentley Continental GTC (4th gen.) in Böblingen --Alexander-93 11:49, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Qatar Airways A7-ALK at Geneva Airport --Mike Peel 11:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 16:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Padirac (Lot, France) - Padirac cave - Rock face, visitors' walkway and statue near the bottom of the pit cave --Benjism89 10:41, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 21:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 11 Lutycka Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 01:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Bad crop at top and at the bottom. PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 10:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apartment house of N. I. Dernov, Nevsky, 80, St. Petersburg --Никонико962 15:00, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Is it just me, or did the perspective correction widen the aspect ratio a bit? For example, the car weels seem a bit wider than if they were perfectly circular. --AVDLCZ 17:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC) Check also the blue edges of the clouds. --Milseburg 11:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC) No response within a week. --Milseburg 12:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apartment house of M. S. Maltzeva, Pushkinskaya street, 1, St. Petersburg --Никонико962 15:00, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
The image seems to be concave inwards (see the right drain pipe), and the windows on the right are not at the same height as the others. Very strange. Is it fixable? --Екатерина Борисова 00:22, 15 December 2024 (UTC) No response within a week. --Milseburg 12:41, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jiufen Old Street, Taiwan --Another Believer 06:31, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose It looks overporcessed and PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 10:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A meniscus midge larva (Dixidae) photographed under a microscope using a 4x objective. --Janeklass 05:29, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Strong CA's --Екатерина Борисова 00:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Not done in a week --Екатерина Борисова 16:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A grave on the old cemetery St. Johann in Saarbrücken --FlocciNivis 21:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Question Why is a different name entered for the copyright? --F. Riedelio 17:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Костел_Успіння,_Язловець,_вхід_SW,_2012_(Rbrechko,_61-212-0018).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Portal in abandoned catholic church in Yazlovets, Ternopil region, Ukraine. --Rbrechko 13:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Too soft IMO. --Benjism89 14:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Slightly unsharp in lower left, but acceptable IMO --Vsatinet 19:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Vsatinet. --Plozessor 05:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good -- Spurzem 20:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Olsztyn_2023_020.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Olsztyn New Town Hall (Nowy Ratusz) --Scotch Mist 08:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose I know it's intentional, but perspective should be corrected here to me. Feel free to send it to discussion. --Sebring12Hrs 09:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for your review - it was 'intentional' because given the many features of this building PC would IMO unrealistically distort at least one feature in an image of the complete building from this angle. --Scotch Mist 09:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment But with this angle it looks like the building is falling backwards, so that's not realistic either. --Sebring12Hrs 10:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distortion isn't fixable and working here. --Milseburg 13:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Spurzem 20:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:20, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Baya_weaver_bulding_its_nest.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Baya weaver bird building its nest in Nepal (by Prasan Shrestha) --Gpkp 06:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:55, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice image, but very noisy. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support The right edge should be cut smooth. Otherwise I like the photo very much. At ISO 1000 it is difficult to avoid slight noise. -- Spurzem 20:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Cadzand-Bad_Hotel_De_Blanke_Top_R01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Hotel De Blanke Top in Cadzand-Bad, Netherlands. -- MJJR 20:16, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Temporarily oppose, but I will change my opinion, if the author crop half of the person on the left --Екатерина Борисова 23:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Екатерина Борисова. --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Oberwesel_im_Novembernebel.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Oberwesel on the Rhine in November fog-- Rolf Kranz 15:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Nice mood and view. The lower right edge needs your attention. It looks different.--Milseburg 16:05, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Strange motif in the right foreground. I added a note, otherwise good.--Sebring12Hrs 17:04, 19 December 2024
- Comment Thanks for the reviews. I have uploaded a new version.--Rolf Kranz 20:49, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Except of the mentioned part the first version was much better. This one is less sharp, tilted and overexposed.--Milseburg 14:05, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you ! It's good now ! --Sebring12Hrs 10:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I am going to remain neutral but this image is worthy for discussion. (The original image was good but the fog creates a complicated atmosphere for critique due to the rarity of such an image. The haze to our right could be fog or grainy noise which is the deception of the image. It is a very difficult image to critique.)--Tzim78 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
OpposeOriginal version was good. New version is tilted and overcontrasted and has less detail. Also the resolution doesn't match any of the camera's native ones, would be interesting (and probably should be in the description) whether this is a panorama or it was cropped or it was widened to optimize the aspect ratio. --Plozessor 07:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)OpposeThe first version wasn’t good either. It had something resembling an AI-generated lower right corner—the top part of the bush was sharp, while the lower part was not, with a clear boundary between these zones. Additionally, the stakes visible in the second version were missing in the first one, which leads me to think they were “fixed” by some AI processing. While the second version avoids this specific issue, it unfortunately suffers from all the other problems mentioned by Milseburg and Plozessor. Jakubhal 13:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The picture is a panorama composed of two photos. With the intention of concentrating the focus on the medieval cityscape shrouded in fog, I cut off the sky in the upper part of the first version. A piece of the bush was missing in the right-hand area because I had held the camera a little too high. The generative extension failed. In the current third version, the cropping was done with the existing image material. --Rolf Kranz 09:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ok for me now -- Jakubhal 10:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposed, and the poles are disturbing. Not sure about the WB. The sharpness, exposure, alignment and cut of the first version were superior. It's a pity that the error in the bottom right cannot be fixed. The replacement image is even less QI in my eyes. --Milseburg 12:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
SupportStill the color and contrast of the original picture were better, but the latest (third) version is acceptable. --Plozessor 06:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Stroke my vote because image has changed again. --Plozessor 12:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Many thanks for the reviews! The criticism is justified and on target. I photographed the scenery again after the fog had lifted. This enabled me to replace the lower edge that was faulty in the earlier shot. The reworked version is a panorama of three photos instead of two.--Rolf Kranz 10:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Info I think, the third version would have passed. Now you have uploaded a fourth version. In my opinion, the problem with the fourth version is the area in the top right that is too bright and the noise. --Milseburg 10:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Rolf Kranz: I suggest you revert this picture and upload the new version as a separate image and nominate it separately. Now we have here a combination of votes for different versions. --Plozessor 12:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Plozessor: A very good suggestion. I have uploaded a new version under the title "Oberwesel im Herbstnebel" and nominate it separatly.--Rolf Kranz (talk) 16:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination------16:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)Rolf Kranz (talk) (UTC)
File:Sonnenuntergang-Las-Vistas-Tenerife-2024.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Sunset at beach Las Vistas at Playa de las Américas on Tenerife --Tuxyso 10:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Looks good, but dark - can you brighten it? --Mike Peel 22:36, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- imho not a good idea to further brighten it is 15 minutes before sunset. please take a look on the histogram, it is exposed well on the highlights --Tuxyso 23:06, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Same as previous (I've been to las Américas at sunset, so I know how this looks IRL. ;-) ) Thanks. Mike Peel 19:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
OpposeI just think it needs another iteration on brightness, like was just done with File:Sunset-Playa del Camisón-Tenerife-2024.jpg, then it would be a QI for me. --Mike Peel 20:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks authentic to me. Good sharpness. I've never been there. I know from other places that evening light doesn't always look the same all days. Perhaps it should be sent into CR. --Milseburg 15:07, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Milseburg. --Plozessor 07:26, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I made minor improvements, please take another look, Mike Peel. --Tuxyso 14:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support That's it (4th version), that looks a lot better to me now, thanks for iterating. :) Thanks. Mike Peel 18:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support For the current (fourth version). Good quality golden hour picture -- Jakubhal 16:13, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Softening the contrast made the image a little less exciting for me. But still QI. --Milseburg 22:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Same here. --Plozessor 05:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
File:St_Maurice_church_in_Langenenslingen_(10).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Saint Maurice church in Langenenslingen, BW, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Sorry: truncated object and disturbing branches --F. Riedelio 16:22, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not so disturbing to me. Let's see what others think. --Sebring12Hrs 20:15, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the combination of aspect ratio, the right part of the church cut off, and the branches in front of the spire are a poor composition IMO, even if the picture is technically good. --Plozessor 15:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fashion changes - even in photography. I remember that a photo of a building, for example, should have a foreground if possible. That could be the branch of a tree. But now a branch on the side of the picture is considered a serious defect. Why? I like the photo presented here. -- Spurzem 19:39, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I quite like the photo and don't perceive those branches as a disturbance -- Jakubhal 05:02, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Spurzem and Jakubhal: I like branches "on the side of the picture" but this one is obscuring the view of the spire. Would have been easy to go a few steps to the side or holding the camera a bit lower to have the branch next to, not in front of, the subject. --Plozessor 07:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:08, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Neuruppin_Tempelgarten_asv2024-04_img7.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Temple Garden in Neuruppin, Brandenburg, Germany. By User:A.Savin --XRay 09:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Badly distorted due to perspective correction --Екатерина Борисова 02:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Are you sure? The picture was not perspective corrected --A.Savin 21:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Of course I don't really know what king of prosessing you used here, but the gate looks asymmetrical with left side visually bigger than right side, and it's not come from the angle of shooting --Екатерина Борисова 00:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I can't see any issue with perspective here. --Sebring12Hrs 17:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Sebring12Hrs. One could consider to skew the upper left corner a bit downward, but it's definitely fine as it is. --Plozessor 05:27, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:06, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Hvítserkur_Sea_Stack,_Northwestern_Region,_Iceland,_20240715_1138_0855.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Hvítserkur Sea Stack, Northwestern Region, Iceland --Jakubhal 04:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose While I understand this image provides visual context for the sea stack and is worth uploading, overall it seems too dark and the stack seems lost in the image. Also, the tourist on the beach is distracting. --GRDN711 05:11, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for review, I would like to ask for other opinions --Jakubhal 05:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I’ve updated the photo description to better reflect the scene. That said, pointing out a tiny figure in the image, barely the size of a dot, as a reason to decline it for being distracting feels a bit overly critical to me. Jakubhal 06:44, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I have uploaded a new brightened version -- Jakubhal 05:14, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Jakubhal: I like your brightened version - definitely an improvement over the orginal. Now we come to the Tourist. Sometimes you throw in a Tourist to provide a sense of scale. Was Tourist a planned part of your making of this image, or did they happen by accident? Would your image be better if Tourist disappeared by digital magic. Your thoughts? --GRDN711 01:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t mind tourists in photos - they often provide a sense of scale. In this case, the tourist is barely noticeable unless you actively look for him. I feel you're applying FPC-level standards to a QIC submission, which doesn’t need to be perfect in every detail. Jakubhal 05:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Jakubhal: You are nominating an image for QI intended for promotional use in Wikipedia and similar. It is not a forum for casual snap shots. If Tourists are in an image, it should be by design of the photographer, not by accident. I supported your other three images of this sea stack rock. While you have improved the 4th, accidental Tourist remains an issue for me (I feel the same way when I see tree branches coming out of people's heads :( ), and I remain opposed. --GRDN711 20:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Plozessor: Please hold up on the final count a little so that we can finish our discussion on this image. --GRDN711 01:51, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Plozessor: All done, Thank you. --GRDN711 20:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support The rock is sliglhtly dark imo (maybe are additional local adjustments of exposure or shadows possible) but overall good quality. The tourist is not a issue for QI imo.--ArildV 12:14, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks absolutely fine to me. If the rock is dark, it can be dark in the picture too.--Milseburg 14:09, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Milseburg. --Plozessor 17:34, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think that this tourist figure is very useful because it helps to understand the size of the rock. The quality is good too. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Croatia_Šibenik_BW_2024-09-30_11-17-48.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Croatia, Šibenik, Tower of the Church of St. John (Crkva sv. Ivana) --Berthold Werner 14:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose I'm afraid the strong perspective correction you had to make here (16 mm and the photographer being really under the subject) make this tower look too much distorted. And the top of the tower is out of focus. Sorry --Benjism89 18:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Changing to neutral after the perspective was improved. --Benjism89 10:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)- Support Imo Ok. Please discuss. --Sebring12Hrs 19:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I'm agree with Benjism89. Left side of tower seems not tilted, but curved. At the same time the right side of tower is straight and vertical. The perspective is overprocessed.Vsatinet 10:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC)- Comment I have tried to improve the perspective (banana effect) --Berthold Werner 16:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'd skew it a bit more (the upper left corner downward), but still it's IMO acceptable. --Plozessor 17:39, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Much better now. But yes, little additional perspective correction required (the upper let corner downward and uper right corner slightly upword). E.g. with skew or/and warp instruments. Vsatinet 19:02, 19 December 2024 (UTC)- Comment Next try. --Berthold Werner 16:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Thank you. Upper part of tower is slightly unsharp, but picture is very acceptable now IMO. Vsatinet 19:35, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Palacio_de_Topkapı,_Estambul,_Turquía,_2024-09-30,_DD_59.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Topkapı Palace, Istanbul, Turkey --Poco a poco 03:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Remontees 21:39, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but looking at the other pictures in the category I come to the conclusion that the proportions are very distorted here (due to the perspective correction I suppose). Please discuss --Екатерина Борисова 07:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Екатерина Борисова --Milseburg (talk) 14:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, too much distorsion. --Bgag 04:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much distortion. It seems like inaccurate PC. Vsatinet 12:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Naso_unicornis_A74259020241123.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Naso unicornis, Rio de Janeiro Aquarium. --Rjcastillo 00:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Not sharp enough for me, sorry --I.Mahesh 01:56, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. let's validate other opinions. --Rjcastillo 02:30, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness acceptable for the situation IMO. --Plozessor 05:47, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support As per Plozessor --Scotch Mist 10:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Difficult situation or not, the fish is too much blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 01:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose main subject out of focus, sorry --Virtual-Pano 16:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:27, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
File:At Frankfurt am Main 2024 019 - Große Liegende.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Willi Schmidt: Große Liegende, Frankfurt --Mike Peel 09:42, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Background needs a perspective improvement --Michielverbeek 10:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Perspective tweaked, does that look better? There's limited scope for adjustment before the statue starts being distorted. Thanks. Mike Peel 11:25, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Imo the background still has to be more straight, but I also realize the main object is very close to the camera position. I would like to hear other opinions about this perspective issue --Michielverbeek 08:33, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Actually this shouldn't go to Discussions without a vote. But anyway: The picture was taken downward. "Fixing" the perspective so that the background is straight would make the statue appear very unnatural - if you want a picture of that statue with a straight background then take it from the front, not from above. But a picture from above has its right to exist and IMO the current perspective is a good compromise. --Plozessor 05:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks good and natural in my eyes. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality with good balance of perspective. --Scotch Mist 10:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Weak opposeBad file name --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)- File renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Opposing vote was stricken. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- File renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Wildpark_Schloss_Tambach_Sakerfalke-20240908-RM-111006-6.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Falco cherrug at the Bavarian Hunting Falconry Center in Tambach Castle Wildlife Park during the birds of prey flight demonstration --Ermell 06:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Some parts of the bird are blown out. Fixable? --Екатерина Борисова 02:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the review.Ermell 10:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- The right wing is still blown out. I do not know how critical this is. Maybe someone else can decide? --Екатерина Борисова 03:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- It helps if you decline than I send it to CR. --Ermell 20:17, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose OK, let's do it and hear what others have to say --Екатерина Борисова 01:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- What do you think? --Ermell 22:21, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ok for me. --Plozessor 05:54, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support On balance - good quality (edge of wing blown out is relatively minor compared with the high quality of detail of the rest of the falcon). --Scotch Mist 09:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:59, 24 December 2024 (UTC)