Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 24 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Yoneshiro_River_201911.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Yoneshiro River and Mount Nanakura in Noshiro City, Akita, Japan. (By Wc018) --掬茶 12:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose It's an amazing composition. But level of detail is too low for QI. --Augustgeyler 15:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I'd agree that the level of detail is too low if this were FPC, but for QIC, I think we should respect this photographer's choice of depth of field and consider that enough of it is sharp enough, per your other remarks on the photo. -- Ikan Kekek 20:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment It was not about DOF but about detail due to sensor (?), processing and compression. --Augustgeyler (talk) 23:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good composition and colours. However, for an APS-C 24 MP sensor, the level of detail is surprisingly low. There is CA along the mountain edges. --Tagooty 13:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support Looks like blurring by noise reduction that could not be repaired by sharpening afterwards. But regarding the rather high resolution still acceptable for QI. --Smial 12:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 03:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 21:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Chiesa_di_Santa_Maria_della_Pace_interno_cupola_Brescia.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View of dome in the Santa Maria della Pace church in Brescia. --Moroder 08:07, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry, but this composition doesn't work. This image is not centered, on the image bottom is too less compared to the top, lines are not parallel to the image borders. Arches are not correct. The dome itself is not centered --PantheraLeo1359531 12:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I disagree You are way too much demanding. This is not FP and I like the photo this way --Moroder 13:18, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Neutral I think it is technically very well done. But the composition is not good. There should be a more clear decision for taking it centred or from an angle. --Augustgeyler 11:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment As you see from the dome it can't be centered --Moroder 12:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment IMHO the composition is good for QI, but the picture seem rather noisy. --Berthold Werner 14:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
    • please look at normal pixel size!--Moroder 21:21, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak support ISO 100 and 4s would have been better. --Berthold Werner 07:38, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support can't see anything incompatible with image guidelines. --MB-one 17:45, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 21:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)