Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 24 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Mosquée_de_la_place_romaine.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mosquée Ennour de Cherchel, Construite sur les ruines d’un temple romain, la mosquée aux cent colonnes couve des vestiges d’une immense richesse architecturale, dont une partie à été mise au jour lors des fouilles pratiquées en 1861 dans sa cour. Cette découverte a été à l’origine de la légende de l’existence d’un cheval ailé en or grandeur nature qui serait encore sous les soubassements de la mosquée. This is a photo of a monument in Algeria identified by the ID 42-011. By User:Zenstar --1989 18:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good composition, quality high enough for Q1. Please translate your description in English --Michielverbeek 19:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry I disagree. Overprocessed, massive perspective distorsion on the left and right side, very noisy sky --Llez 19:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for the noise Llez points out. But as for the request for translation to English, let's please not assume everyone has the skill to do so, nor is there any bar to files with exclusively French-language descriptions being promoted to QI. -- Ikan Kekek 22:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry Liez, I did not take enough time for looking to this photo. The sky is indeed too noisy for a Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 01:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Notre_Dame_de_Paris_by_night.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Notre Dame de Paris by night --Livioandronico2013 08:45, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sky ruined by noise and its excessive reduction. Sorry. --A.Savin 13:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sky doesn't look natural for me --Michielverbeek 07:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Nor to me, either, but it seems to me, we've featured photos that had similarly blotchy sky, though it was dark blue/black instead of different shades of blue. -- Ikan Kekek 11:37, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed and perspective correction overdone. --Smial 12:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others, sorry. --Basotxerri 16:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 01:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_de_Altagracia,_Isla_de_Margarita.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Iglesia de Altagracia, Isla de Margarita --The Photographer 09:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too noisy. Why ISO500? --A.Savin 15:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Because personal safely in Venezuela, you need take exterior pictures from a car or walking fast, it's actually very dangerous --The Photographer 16:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment I'm very sorry about the current condition of Venezuela (I remember 1991/92 very well when Russia was in a somewhat similar condition), but I don't think it's relevant for QIC. --A.Savin 16:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
        • I'm only answering your ISO question, btw, please, could you take another look? I Applied a denoise. Thanks --The Photographer 17:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
          • Yes, I've looked at. The facade sharpness does not satisfy me in this version; other opinions appreciated. Thanks --A.Savin 18:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Especially the darker parts don't look sufficient for a QI, IMO, much of the details are lost, sorry. --Basotxerri 16:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 01:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)