Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 14 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Lagartija_de_lava_de_San_Cristóbal_(Microlophus_bivittatus),_Punta_Pitt,_isla_de_San_Cristóbal,_islas_Galápagos,_Ecuador,_2015-07-24,_DD_69.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination San Cristóbal lava lizard (Microlophus bivittatus), Punta Pitt, San Cristobal Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 10:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough. --Medium69 11:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Looks fine to me. Please let's discuss --Poco a poco 17:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Ghare_Kelisa.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The Saint Thaddeus Monastry (Ghara Kelisa or the Black church) is an ancient Armenian monastery located in West Azerbaijan, Iran. By User:Newyork3 --Ilya 19:32, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Please provide a higher resolution. We do not encourage thumbnail sizes of landscape format motifs. --Cccefalon 20:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
  • What about the downsampling rule? I would like to discuss whether such images are regarded as thumbnails. --Milseburg 15:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

 Question: Why did you sent this to CR, Milseburg? There was no Decline by Cccefalon neither Promotion! It is pointless to move a zero decision to a higher level. --Hubertl 10:36, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Sorry, The downsampling rule doesn't apply here, we must discuss the changes of QIC rules here --Ezarate 11:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As it was moved to CR, I have to change my comment to an oppose. --Cccefalon 13:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Oh yes, sorry. You´re right. A downsampling rule exists. I missed it here, but now I find it there. Maybe I´m going to add another contribution to the discussion of this rule´s sense here.  Support Nevertheless no thumbnail for me in this case. --Milseburg 17:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 17:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Circuito_mágico_del_agua,_Parque_Reserva,_Lima,_Perú,_2015-07-28,_DD_125.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Magical water circuit, Reserve Park, Lima, Peru --Poco a poco 18:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment A bit tilted (counterclockwise). Once fixed I think it should pass. --Michael Barera 02:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Sorry, but I do not see the tilt. --Medium69 23:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

 Question: Why did you sent this to CR, Medium69? There was no Decline by Michael Barera neither Promotion! Just a note. It´s common practice that, if someone adds a note (as a comment), that the nominator is informed and will check this with the person, which has added the comment, not a third party. It is pointless to move a zero decision to a higher level by force. --Hubertl 10:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

  •  Comment He sees an incline while I do not see it. I prefer to have a different opinion in this case. --Medium69 10:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
     Comment I think you mean decline. No, there was no decline, just a a indication. At the beginning of the day, I have to check this, if I do it wrong (because nobody understand the meaning behind), I will be then the bad guy. --Hubertl 10:58, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

File:EstatuaLuchadores-Tandil.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Luchadores, copy of Lysippos's sculpture, Plaza Independencia, Tandil, Argentina. Molten on Fonderie du Val d’Osne, del Bd. Voltaire 53, París, Francia --Ezarate 14:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Tilted. --Medium69 00:55, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Ezarate 13:50, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose There is a problem of distortion; when I see the first picture, I see good ... I no longer understand. --Medium69 23:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment The same here, Medium69. Yes or no? What's the meaning, to send a zero-result to CR? --Hubertl 10:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose distorted. Kruusamägi 14:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Plitvice_Lakes_National_Park_BW_2014-10-13_12-27-16.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Croatia, Plitvice Lakes National Park --Berthold Werner 15:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. Nice capture! --Michael Barera 19:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC)  Comment
  •  Oppose Please look at the horizon, the picture is slightly tilted. --SKas 19:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Where is a horizont in the picture?! I see only riverbanks and hills/wood! --Elrond 10:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Water level. It is always horizontal. --SKas 15:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment wrong! a flowing water is not level. A ship without running engine could go faster than the river flows (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiefeln) (sorry there is no english article for). And the rear riverside is not right angeld. So it is impossible to find a level there. --Elrond 21:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Only, if you are capturing the picture directly from the water level. In this case, you have different levels because of three different distances. --Hubertl 15:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
  • It isn't necessary to look at the left or right coast. Look attentively at the far coast of the lake and you will see a small inclination to the right. It is necessary to turn a few a photo to the left.--KSK (talk) 16:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
The far coast isn't right-angled to the view, so you cannot use it to decide that the picture is tilted. --Berthold Werner 18:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 15:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Sharpness and composition are good, but it's rather dark in my opinion. --Hendric Stattmann 13:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose dark, seems tilted, somewhat unsharp. Kruusamägi 13:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 16:14, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Giraffa_camelopardalis_(Girafe)_-_379.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Giraffa camelopardalis (Giraffe) in the ZooParc de Beauval in Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, France. -- Medium69 10:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Nice composition, but head too unsharp --Daniel Case 03:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think, the sharpness is ok, partly unsharp is normal for this quite tall piece of meat. Heads are mostly overestimated ;-) --Hubertl 10:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Head unsharp. Alvesgaspar 19:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support as Hubertl --Milseburg 20:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As for Daniel Case -- Smial 10:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support If I look follow pics sharp enough: 1, 2, 3 --Jean11 (talk) 16:50, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support per others --Palauenc05 15:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunate lighting (backlight), lack of sharpness. --Hendric Stattmann 12:56, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Hendric Stattmann. Kruusamägi 13:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:13, 13 December 2015 (UTC)