Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 10 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Pfingsttreffen_Puetnitz_2018,_Ribnitz-Damgarten_(1X7A2721).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Amphibious combat vehicle splashing into the water at Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018, Ribnitz-Damgarten --MB-one 19:12, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  SupportGood quality. --Cayambe 11:55, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
  •  OpposeI disagree. Not much visible except for a big splash. Good shutter speed though. --Aciarium 23:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't think it's important for the background to be sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK. I would crop out 1/3 of the water at the bottom. --XRay 09:48, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:03, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

File:20220427_St._Andreas_Eching_07.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The interior of the church St. Andreas in Eching --FlocciNivis 12:01, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 20:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Blown highlights and unsharp. Sorry. --Ermell 21:29, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with Ermell. --Tagooty 06:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No moving objects, tripod recommended and max. ISO 200. Two or three stops lower sensitivity means two or three stops better contrast range at the same time for most camera models. And, of course, correspondingly less noise. --Smial 13:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --C messier 18:04, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Karsha_Gompa_Full_View_Zanskar_Ladakh_Oct22_A7C_04024.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Karsha Gompa, Zanskar, Ladakh, India --Tagooty 00:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:17, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Partly unsharp, especially the corners --Llez 06:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Per Llez. --Sebring12Hrs 10:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 18:05, 9 December 2022 (UTC)