Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 02 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Pörtschach_Leonstein_Gloriettenweg_Ost-Teil_17112024_5608.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Eastern part of the forest hiking trail Gloriettenweg in Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:23, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Suggest taking more care in composing your images and which ones you upload and nominate. This image seems just a casual snapshot and not a serious attempt to illustrate the Gloriettenweg forest hiking trail. IMO it has insufficient value per COM:QIC guidelines on Value. --GRDN711 18:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree with the disagreeing. Why do you think this picture would not be valuable and not suitable to illustrate the Gloriettenweg? --Plozessor 05:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Plozessor. --Sebring12Hrs 13:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK --XRay 18:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Per Quality Image technical requirements in COM:QIC
“Value - Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.”
The nominator put up 5 images of an obscure Austrian hiking trail. I did not object to three of them as they seemed to have some compositional focus that might illustrate this trail and be used for some Wikimedia purpose.
However, these two did not seem to be more than brown autumn leaves taken anywhere. The nominator has uploaded 116 (100 are QI) autumn images of this trail (search on Gloriettenweg) taken over the years and has much experience.
IMHO these two images did not seem to be up to his usual work and IMO are unlikely to find usage in Wikimedia compared to many of his similar, better images. --GRDN711 04:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
 Comment I don't see a problem here. This image illustrates several aspects: The path "Gloriettenweg" in particular, a hiking trail in autumn and a trail with railing. I took a photo of an inconspicuous sign near a street, where a significance is not visible at first glance, but it was useful for a WIkipedia article and even a German computer magazine (Chip) used it. Also: Having photographs of any street or named and established path is relevant, as it illustrates a particular part of infrastructure, which is used by many hundreds to thousands of people --PantheraLeo1359531 18:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:09, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Porsche_911_Turbo_3.6,_Auto_2024,_Zurich_(PANA0363).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Porsche 911 Turbo 3.6 at Auto Zürich 2024 --MB-one 10:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose too much reflection --The Blue Rider 00:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. These reflections belong to images at car shows. Quality is good enough IMHO. --Alexander-93 18:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support The guy behind the rear window is a bit disturbing. But, like the reflections, this can't really be avoided at such events. --Plozessor 05:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Looking at the door and side window, I think the photo is not a QI. -- Spurzem 22:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. --Smial 12:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Mitziehen_001_2016_08_16.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination DescriptionBlurred grape (Vitis vinifera) by panning (turning the camera around the optical axis)
    --F. Riedelio 10:23, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Too much of a blue motion to even understand what it is --The Blue Rider 00:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
    This is a photo for the Commons photo competition with the theme “Panning” (Method: turning the camera around the optical axis during exposure time) --F. Riedelio 07:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Quality of the image corresponds to the description and the tasks stated by the author IMO. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:29, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support OK, but the filename should be better. --XRay 06:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)