Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 28 2020

• 
  • Nomination Angelica archangelica on the banks of the Broeresleat.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Broeresleat seen from Westpolderbrêge, towards southwest.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ambigram don't stop. 180° rotational symmetry. Animated logo (38 frames), white on red background. --Basile Morin 04:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ambigram This joy / You shit. 90° rotational symmetry. Humorous design. Black letters on yellow background. --Basile Morin 04:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Love padlocks in the port of Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graffiti at Wolfgang Borchert Theater in the port of Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quay crane in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Penitence cross on the bridge over the Aa at Bispinghof in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vitaneum on Adolf-Kolping-Gasse, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vitaneum on Adolf-Kolping-Gasse, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Nice weather. Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Benedictine school (erected in the year 1878) on the Benediktiner square #1, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential building on Adolf-Kolping-Gasse #10, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Really minor vertical distorsions. Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Post und Telekom Austria AG Fernmeldebetriebsamt on Josef-Mickl-Gasse #2, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Icelandair Douglas DC-3 (TG-NPK) at Reykjavik Airport, Iceland --GRDN711 02:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Downtown Austin, Texas, United States. By User:Paxsimius --Another Believer 23:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, not good enough. Buildings are leaning out, low sharpness, CAs, stitching errors (white line in the sky). --XRay 04:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main Building of the University of Texas at Austin, Texas, United States. By User:Nv8200pa --Another Believer 23:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination It was built, by decision of the municipality and of the Florentine people, as the residence of the Priors, the representatives of the Major Arts, among the Corporations that governed the city. The palace has the appearance of an inaccessible fortress, with a simple rectangular base transmitting security in a period of conflicts between the Guelphs and Ghibellines, built in ashlar of strong stone attributed to the architect Arnolfo di Cambio, completed in 1314. --PROPOLI87 22:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp enough for QI--Michielverbeek 20:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tel Aviv HaShalom train station. By User:Ynhockey --Andrew J.Kurbiko 20:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose It is not a good comosition, not chosen what to concentrate on --Augustgeyler 21:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Perito Moreno Glacier, Argentina --Poco a poco 19:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 19:40, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The ramps were designed by the architect Poggi in the mid-nineteenth century, as part of a more general project for the renovation of much of the urban planning of the city of Florence. They connect the avenues with Piazzale Michelangelo, passing through Porta San Niccolò you can enjoy the panorama of Florence. They were restored in May 2019 and restored to their former glory. --PROPOLI87 21:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Overexposed, large areas blown + noise. -- Ikan Kekek 19:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Golden Autumn on the Black Przemsza river in the Sielecki Park in Sosnowiec --Stimoroll 18:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support good composition, very intense colors --Augustgeyler 21:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brussels North station, from Rue du Progrès --Trougnouf 17:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eichelfrucht einer Stieleiche in Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 17:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brauerstraße 2 in Tecklenburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. --Tournasol7 16:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Our Lady church in Saint-Chély-du-Tarn, Lozčre, France. --Tournasol7 16:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bust of Leonardo da Vinci in the garden of Villa Borghese in Rome, Italy. --Tournasol7 16:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination near Borgholzhausen NRW-Gütersloh, living house in panorama --Michielverbeek 15:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Loxten, panorama from Am Sandbrink --Michielverbeek 15:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose details very dark, not showing any prominent --Augustgeyler 21:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaster model of a statue of Saint Paul. --Moroder 14:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 14:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Königsangerspitze seen from the east in the morning --Milseburg 13:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The ramps were designed by the architect Poggi in the mid-nineteenth century, as part of a more general project for the renovation of much of the urban planning of the city of Florence. They connect the avenues with Piazzale Michelangelo, passing through Porta San Niccolò you can enjoy the panorama of Florence. They were restored in May 2019 and restored to their former glory. --PROPOLI87 14:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Blown, etc. (see comments above). -- Ikan Kekek 19:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Polichromed woodcarved Madonna with child by August Runggaldier. --Moroder 10:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Raja Harish Chandra Palace ruins at Savar. --Syed07 09:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose composition, house behind the tree --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eternal Flame and Swadhinata Stambha in one frame. --Syed07 09:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose perspective is hidding esential parts of the object --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aspark Owl at IAA 2017, Frankfurt --MB-one 09:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 16:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volkswagen I.D. Buzz at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 09:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 16:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maker Faire Berlin 2018, FEZ Wuhlheide --MB-one 09:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South side of St Paisie Romanian Orthodox Church in Bebington Cemetery, Wirral --Rodhullandemu 09:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apse at the east end of St Paisie Romanian Orthodox Church in Bebington Cemetery, Wirral --Rodhullandemu 09:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support good concept, well done --Augustgeyler 10:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nice dog--Celeda 08:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old ochers quarries--Celeda 08:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of the church Petrus and Bernhard in Klosterlangheim --Ermell 07:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 16:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crosses on the war cemetery St. Georgen in Bayreuth --Ermell 07:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --Peulle 07:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Special Area of Conservation in Spain with the ID:. By User:DamiánQP --Elryck 06:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: multiple issues. --Peulle 06:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Special Area of Conservation in Spain with the ID:. By User:Llosu --Elryck 06:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Would have been a QI in 2012 but today the standards are a bit higher. Sorry. --Ermell 06:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower bud of one Dictamnus albus.
    --Famberhorst 05:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail Reformed church from 1790 De Fontein (Oudemirdum) National monument.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Russisch-orthodox klooster (Hemelum) Main entrance to the monastery.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A separate asphalt roller track with a length of 1500 m in the new part of Sielecki Park in Sosnowiec. --Stimoroll 20:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canal between lake Moreno west and bay López of lake Nahuel Huapi (back) --Ezarate 13:58, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose overexposed --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former offices of the Léonard-Giot-Allard steelworks in Marchienne-au-Pont (Charleroi-Belgium). --Jmh2o 13:33, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 11:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Glider used by Nazi in Vassieux en Vercors, France--Celeda 08:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose object and background are going together --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Glider used by Nazi in Vassieux en Vercors, Drôme--Celeda 08:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose composition --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Takanori Suzuki, Suzuki press conference, IAA 2017 --MB-one 07:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I'd crop it more, at least the red arrow --Poco a poco 09:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
     Done --MB-one 12:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BLG-60 bridgelayer at Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018, Ribnitz-Damgarten --MB-one 07:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Dust spot at the top in the middle --Poco a poco 09:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
     Done --MB-one 12:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Midtown TLV. By User:Ynhockey --Andrew J.Kurbiko 06:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 11:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Actitis hypoleucos (common sandpiper) in Port of Burela (Lugo, Galicia, España). --Drow male 13:05, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syed07 08:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Commemorative bench, San Francisco square, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 10:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support technically good picture --Augustgeyler 21:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Le Teil, France, aftermath of the earthquake, November 2019--Celeda 09:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose sharp picture, interesting object, but not well composed --Augustgeyler 21:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aftermath of the earthquake in Le Teil, France, November 11, 2019--Celeda 09:13, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose to take a good picture of this object might be a very heavy task. Bit with that angle and composition, its not. --Augustgeyler 21:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Caucasian Mountains near Dombay, Russia. By Ted.ns --Atsirlin 06:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Not sure what went wrong, but the right half is not sharp --Poco a poco 06:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose sharpness --Augustgeyler 09:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The cemetry for the fallen russian soldiers of the second world war on the cemetery Matzleinsdorf in Vienna, Austria --D-Kuru 22:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose technically ok, but the composition is not that good. The background is disturbing due to its sharpnes --Augustgeyler 09:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bruce Cape near Slavyanka, Russia. By User:Андрей Кровлин --Atsirlin 08:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Le contraste clair-obscur ainsi que la netteté de la paroi contre le flou laiteux de l'eau donnent à l'image un rendu irréel voire fantastique--Elryck 06:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Young men playing football on the beach Douada Bahriya, Tipaza. By User:Sofiane mohammed amri --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support well done, good focus and scene --Augustgeyler 09:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hierophis viridiflavus in Manerba. --Moroder 06:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose perspective, orientation, composition --Augustgeyler 09:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing and nectaring of Eurema hecabe Linnaeus, 1758 –Common Grass Yellow (by SVKMBFLY) --Atudu 12:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good but the lens dust spot on the left side of flower and background noises should be cleaned --Zcebeci 13:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
     Support ISO 200? It looks like ISO 3200. But it --Augustgeyler 09:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
     Support ISO 200? It loks like ISO 3200 – But it is very well composed --Augustgeyler 09:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern view of the parish church in Weidling, Upper Austria. -- Bwag 08:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Tower is leaning to the right while verticals of both edges are vertical--Michielverbeek 09:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
    No reaction, within a week --Michielverbeek 06:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ditch in Drôme--Celeda 08:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose composition --Augustgeyler 09:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City landscape with mountains on the horizon and forest plantations in the foreground. --Aleda12 07:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Add the appropriate category names to the picture. Give the name of city in the description. --Zcebeci 08:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC) Oppose Beautiful view, but the details are washed out so it looks like a mobile phone photo.--Peulle 08:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pebble sea coast in the evening with people strolling in the distance against the backdrop of a mountain city on the horizon. --Aleda12 07:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Add some appropriate categories to the picture --Zcebeci 08:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)  Oppose WB is off, and the details are washed out.--Peulle 08:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A landscaped plaza in a mountain resort with a metal bridge with a roof and houses against the backdrop of mountains on the horizon. --Aleda12 07:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose composition, looks as it should tell as the storry of that lamp? Or is it about that great landscape? --Augustgeyler 09:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volvo V70R at Tuning World Bodensee 2018 --MB-one 08:40, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 09:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
     Done --MB-one 12:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
     Support well done --Augustgeyler 08:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wrestling at the 2018 Summer Youth Olympics – Boys Freestyle 55kg Group Stage GUM-ALG. By User:DerHexer --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Shouldn't the names of the athletes be in the categories?--Peulle 07:02, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose technically perfect, well compossed – but sadly the face of the right sportsman ist hidden --Augustgeyler 08:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Marcinelle_-_Haut_fourneau_numéro_4_-_2020-08-22_-_06.jpg

• Nomination Marcinelle (Charleroi-Belgium) - Blast furnace number 4 being demolished. --Jmh2o 10:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad composition; distortion; exposure, poor sensor --Augustgeyler 20:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment @Augustgeyler : Regarding the composition, perhaps the chimney on the left could be removed. Concentrating the distortion, I corrected the perspective only a little, just accentuated the verticals. It's a blast furnace! The sensor, the camera is a Nikkon D5100 from 2014 with recent Tamron lenses (Google translation). --Jmh2o 07:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment distortion is now fixed, composition look better now. I don't know why this is still looking like an old sensor. Perhaps you lost dynamic range while processing.--Augustgeyler (talk) 11:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support. If I want to count pixels, the image might be a little bit soft, but all in all it easily meets the QIC criteria. --Smial 09:57, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support QI to me

Vote removed. Signature required.--Peulle 07:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Good for me -- Spurzem 20:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   XRay 03:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Münster,_Hafen,_Kran_--_2020_--_8102.jpg

• Nomination Quay crane in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting view. But as the eyes are automatically led to the pulley near the center, this should have been sharp. For a static object like this, the DOF of a wide angle lens should manage this distance. --PtrQs 16:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment @PtrQs You are demanding a focus stack in landscape photography. --Smial 06:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support. Regarding the high resolution DOF and general sharpness are good enough. Printable to A3 and larger without issues. f/16 and higher would lead to increasing diffraction, so we would see more DOF, but decreasing general sharpness. Good composition and lighting, can't see other flaws. --Smial 06:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment @Smial: I fear you are starting from wrong assumptions. The statement that it is technically not possible to get that central subject sharp, cannot be a reason for accepting this error. Then you have to accept that it's not possible to declare this a QI image. With this reasoning you can justify nearly any flaw and the QI definition gets irrelevant. This is not a race to find excuses to declare images QI, this is a review process. --PtrQs 10:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

printed at 300dpi at a size of about 57cm x 38 cm the image is everywhere crisp and sharp. What are your expectations for a QI? --Smial 12:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Done It's difficult to see and IMO not a problem, the photograph is sharp enough. Nevertheless I improved the sharpness. (f/11 was a good choice. With f/16 the pulley may be sharper, but the whole photograph would loose sharpness.) --XRay 13:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   XRay 03:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Vue_depuis_le_sommet_du_Puy_Mary_sur_la_brêche_de_Roland.jpg

• Nomination Vue depuis le sommet du Puy Mary sur la brêche de RolandEn tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante :. By User:Yvesdebxl --Elryck 18:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. The details are washed out.--Peulle 09:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Peulle. -- Ikan Kekek 05:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose very nice picture. But somehow most details got lost, perhaps while processing or due to compression. --Augustgeyler 11:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   XRay 12:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Ayuntamiento,_Badajoz,_España,_2020-07-22,_DD_07.jpg

• Nomination Town hall of Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 10:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 11:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Please fix the verticals at the left --Basile Morin 12:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I see the issue. If the building is indeed vertical throughout, we should be able to see that, so Basile is right. -- Ikan Kekek 05:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose light is very hard, many parts in the foreground with overexposure — Preceding unsigned comment added by Augustgeyler (talk • contribs) 11:40, 25. August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment New version uploaded, according to Lr no overexposure here Poco a poco 19:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. Verticals and exposure are ok. --Milseburg (talk) 19:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Restoring support. -- Ikan Kekek 01:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   XRay 03:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Tremblement_de_terre_du_11_novembre_2019,_Le_Teil,_quatre_mois_plus_tard._02.jpg

• Nomination France, Le Teil, aftermath of the earthquake, November 2019--Celeda
• Decline
•  Oppose Sorry but look a bit grainy, especially on the right side. The right side also feels cut, like cross or monument should be there too --Podzemnik 04:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
• I disagree , Maybe grainy, but the right side is not cut at all ! the top of bell tower fell under effect of the earhquake --Celeda 08:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • I agree for perspective distortion--Celeda 07:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think you need a perspective fix. The damage looks worse this way, but then we see tilted houses in the background left and right and realize that this isn't a true picture of how the damaged church looks. -- Ikan Kekek 05:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Spurzem 20:40, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   XRay 03:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Mercy_kutty_Amma_Closeup_5.jpg

• Nomination J.Mercykutty Amma is an Indian politician and the Minister for Fisheries, Harbour Engineering, Cashew Industry; Fisheries University, Government of Kerala. By User:Sanu N --Kiran Gopi 04:26, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Good photograph, but small resolution. Is it full resolution? Please upload a higher resolution. --XRay 04:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline

•  Support At 4 megapixels this more than meets the requirements for QI. --ReneeWrites 09:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC) I hadn't noticed the editing at the hair. Very unfortunate :/ -- ReneeWrites 19:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose I disagree. If there is an issue, you can't overrule with a promotion. A discussion is possible. IMO for this kind of photograph the resolution is too small. --XRay 07:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support For once, although I never really do this, I'm going to support a downsampled image - for three reasons: 1) the image is crystal sharp (see the individual threads on the cloth), so it does not appear to be a case of downsampling in order to make a soft image look sharper and appear of higher quality than it actually is, 2) we are judging by the year 2000 standards, and 3) the Guidelines specifically mention images of people as a valid exception: "Downsampling images of living persons can be advisable if the images would otherwise show details of the body (e. g. skin, teeth) in unacceptable magnification, which could be considered offensive or violate the person's rights.". --Peulle 07:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Weird processing of the hair unfortunately, especially at the left -- Basile Morin 11:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpness is good, size OK, but as @Basile Morin showed, by substituting the background with artificial green the hair was cut in a creepy way. I marked those faults in the picture. Maybe the style of this portrait should fullfill certain cultural expectations, but for me the clumsy edit kills a good portrait. --PtrQs 13:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile, PtrQs. -- Ikan Kekek 01:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   XRay 03:45, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Cemetery_cross_on_the_cemetery_Halbturn,_Burgenland,_Austria-full_PNr°0716.jpg

• Nomination The cemetery cross on the cemetery Halbturn, Burgenland, Austria --D-Kuru 21:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Not very sharp given the static subject; the tree behind the cross is distracting. --Tagooty 05:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

• @Tagooty: If viewed at 100% the cross seems fine, the figure's hair is sharp and the iconic wound in his chest is also clearly visible. So I don't quite get how not very sharp it is. Maybe you can clarify. The tree was growing there and I'm much more into capturing reality than cutting down a like 20+ year old tree just for one shot (also given that this is QI and not FP) --D-Kuru 22:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

• Viewed at 100%, I find the writing on the gravestones and the texture of the wall to be very sharp -- both are well behind the cross. The flowers at the base of the cross and the edges of the cross appear a bit fuzzy. The depth of field in the EXIF is shown as "18.32m - inf" (may be inaccurate). How far was the cross from the camera? For a QI, the tree is ok. Perhaps shot a bit from the right and applying PC would have reduced the effect of the tree? --Tagooty 15:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

• I switched to the dicuss template so this text is not cramped in a small box. @Tagooty: Some of the flowers at the base are on the same plane as the cross, others are like 20-30cm infront of it - given an apature of f/9 and the wide angle lens it should not be that different. The distance to the cross was like 10 meters or so. My main point of focus was the cross to I wanted to have it right in the center at a right angle to my view direction. --D-Kuru 19:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

• With a focus distance of 10m, f/9, Canon EOS40D, 61mm, the DoF is ~6.8m - 20m (https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/dof-calculator.htm). If focus point is on the cross, the flowers at the base are well within the DoF and hence should be sharp. My guess is that the camera actually focussed on the gravestone behind the cross, to the right of center. In that case, the cross would be at the near edge of DoF, with the wall within the far edge. The flowers near the gravestones are noticeably sharper than the flowers at the base of the cross which supports this hypothesis.
  If you extract the EXIF from the original image, it may show the exact focus point (use eg. exiftool or PIE). Nikon image processing software shows the focus point, Canon s/w may do likewise. BTW, the EXIF data in your image is a bit mangled with some fields missing/incorrect, perhaps due to editing with GIMP. --Tagooty 04:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   XRay 04:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Plak-IL-Shakhsi.svg

• Nomination License plate of Israeli civilian vehicles (7 digits). By User:Юкатан --Andrew J.Kurbiko 06:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. Sorry but I do not see how this image is interesting, nor on the subject only on its composition, its exhibition or the details. --Elryck 18:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, and it's useful because it's a document and Commons is in part a reference site. -- Ikan Kekek 09:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just a license plate. We could upload billions of similar images of these. I don´t think such motifs could be a QI. I see it below enough threshold of originality. --Milseburg 10:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Milseburg. I also looked for photos of Israeli number plates. The vast majority of plates based on this EU scheme with the blue box at the edge have square separators. Only older plates without the blue field have short hyphens. --Smial 11:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't mind that there are a lot of such license plates. Further we have many other motifs that are repeated. We also rated street signs well which were nothing special. With the picture to be assessed here, however, I wonder whether it is actually a license plate that was photographed on a vehicle. Rather, I suspect that is not the case. -- Spurzem 20:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   XRay 04:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Rame_TER_Auvergne_Rhône_Alpes_Gare_St_Rambert_Bugey_7.jpg

• Nomination Regional train in Saint-Rambert-en-Bugey train station, France. --Chabe01 22:23, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  SupportGood quality. --Celeda 16:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The front of the train is blurred --Jakubhal 05:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Too strong noise reduction at the roof. --Berthold Werner 06:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. Sharpening didn't fix the motion blur. --Smial 11:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others.--Peulle 11:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   XRay 04:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Colectivo_Licuado_-_Een_stevige_maaltijd.png

• Nomination Mural of a hearty meal, located in the city of Breda --ReneeWrites 22:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  
• Promotion  Comment Celeda: Is this something that can be fixed by cropping, or does this image suffer from more substantial problems? ReneeWrites 15:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
   Comment For me cropping is enough, I like good framing and composition. But I am new on this page, I'm not a big specialist,good luck--Celeda 08:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support ( pleased to have talk with you. I'm not good with computer science) --Celeda 06:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
   Comment Celeda: I fixed the framing, I also removed the shadow and increased the resolution. Could you take another look at this? (You may have to clear your cache before the new image shows up) -- ReneeWrites 09:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Way too narrow crop. Not recognisable as a Mural. --Smial 11:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Smial: What are your thoughts on the previous version? If I fixed the verticals of that one and cropped so the wall and roof would still be visible, would that be better? --ReneeWrites 12:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Would be ok after perspective correction (verticals). I myself would not crop out any of the surroundings. They belong to the scene. --Smial 12:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for the feedback, Smial. I uploaded a new version where the verticals are corrected. I did end up cropping it a bit, mostly because the street light on the left (that can be seen on the original upload) was being an eyesore, but the new crop shows the entire side of the building & gives a better impression of its scale. --ReneeWrites 20:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, and I like it much better now that it clearly shows the framing and context. -- Ikan Kekek 05:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. --Smial 07:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. --Jakubhal 12:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support good work! --Augustgeyler 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   XRay 04:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Il_David_che_guarda_Firenze_dal_Piazzale_Michelangelo_(HDR).jpg

• Nomination The David looking at Florence from Piazzale Michelangelo (HDR). --PROPOLI87 17:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality., good idea to show the dark side of the moon ! --Celeda 17:39, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry - but for me the sky is too noisy, sharpness is lacking and there is an obtrusive blue halo around the sculpture. --PtrQs 00:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment to specify 'halo': apart from the 'enlightenment' there is a blue rim at the contour of each sculpture. --PtrQs 15:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per PtrQs.--Peulle 11:23, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise, minor CAs and IMO some perspective issues. Crop could be better too. --XRay 18:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Musée_de_la_Résistance_de_Vassieux_en_Vercors_10.jpg

• Nomination Museum of Résistance in Vassieux en Vercors--Celeda 09:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Randomed crop (cropped flag) --Poco a poco 11:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

  No other problems for you !? --Celeda 17:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC) I chose this photo because the flags are not the subject, but the people in the background give the scale ! --Celeda 11:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

  What do you mean? that's to me reason enough to decline. Otherwise the image is clearly tilted (look at the houses in the back), the left crop is too tight, detail is soso and contrast too high (with some areas overeposed). You are new here, you should presume good faith and try to learn out of the feedback you get. Poco a poco 11:10, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Cropped flag and this is avoidable --Michielverbeek 07:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop and I can't decide if the hills or that contraption are the main subject. The main subject should be instantly obvious. Seven Pandas 21:04, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 21:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle 11:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   XRay 04:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

File:War_cemetery_for_World_war_II_on_the_cemetery_Kalksburg_in_Vienna,_Austria-large-grave_stone-right_PNr°0616.jpg

• Nomination The cemetry for the fallen russian soldiers of the second world war on the cemetery Kalksburg in Vienna, Austria --D-Kuru 21:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose leaning to the left --Celeda 15:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

• @Celeda: how is this one leaning to the left? I rechecked the outer edges of the gravestone and they look pretty much in line for me. Also the font and the horizontal elements line up with the horizontal lines in GIMP. Please explain a bit better. --D-Kuru 20:18, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
• I make the same mistake, the background (the wall and commemorative plaques) goes up to the right, sorry. --Celeda 06:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Question I'm confused. What's the reality on the site? Does the wall really go upwards like that?--Peulle 07:35, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose this perspective is not working for me. background is disturbing and I am missing any depth.--Augustgeyler 08:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   XRay 09:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

File:2020-01-10_Women's_Super_G_(2020_Winter_Youth_Olympics)_by_Sandro_Halank–089.jpg

• Nomination Hanna Aronsson Elfman, Women's Super G at the 2020 Winter Youth Olympics in Lausanne --Sandro Halank 20:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Just ok given the size --Poco a poco 19:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose too blue --Charlesjsharp 11:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Seven Pandas 22:46, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support White balance is fine, blue colour on snow is real sprayed and expanded by skiing. --Stepro 21:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charlesjsharp. --Fischer.H 17:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Background color can be approved by my very own photos there (example). DerHexer 20:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Do you have a conflict of interest DerHexer? I understood Wikimedia Foundation Germany sponsored this photographer. Apologies if I am wrong. Charlesjsharp 07:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support WB is OK (see white helmet). The somehow creepy position of the skier is not the photographers fault. --PtrQs 23:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed and/or oversaturated with colour channel clipping in wide areas. --Smial 10:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image does not seem natural to me, too retouched by saturation, which gives this white-blue effect and it unseals the colors of the combination. For me, an IQ image doesn't have to be so retouched--Elryck 20:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

File:2020-01-10_Women's_Super_G_(2020_Winter_Youth_Olympics)_by_Sandro_Halank–153.jpg

• Nomination Amanda Salzgeber, Women's Super G at the 2020 Winter Youth Olympics in Lausanne --Sandro Halank 20:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 22:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose too blue --Charlesjsharp 11:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Seven Pandas 22:45, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support White balance is fine, blue colour on snow is real sprayed and expanded by skiing. --Stepro 21:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charlesjsharp. --Fischer.H 17:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Background color can be approved by my very own photos there (example). DerHexer 20:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Do you have a conflict of interest DerHexer? I understood Wikimedia Foundation Germany sponsored this photographer. Apologies if I am wrong. Charlesjsharp 08:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support WB is OK for white snow. --PtrQs 23:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed and/or oversaturated with colour channel clipping in wide areas. --Smial 10:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image does not seem natural to me, too retouched by saturation, which gives this white-blue effect and it unseals the colors of the combination. For me, an IQ image doesn't have to be so retouched--Elryck 20:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose it got to much of all: saturation, contrast, exposure--Augustgeyler 08:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   XRay 09:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

File:2020-01-10_Women's_Super_G_(2020_Winter_Youth_Olympics)_by_Sandro_Halank–137.jpg

• Nomination Delia Durrer, Women's Super G at the 2020 Winter Youth Olympics in Lausanne --Sandro Halank 20:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose too blue --Charlesjsharp 11:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Seven Pandas 22:45, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support White balance is fine, blue colour on snow is real sprayed and expanded by skiing. --Stepro 21:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charlesjsharp. --Fischer.H 17:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Background color can be approved by my very own photos there (example). DerHexer 20:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Do you have a conflict of interest DerHexer? I understood Wikimedia Foundation Germany sponsored this photographer. Apologies if I am wrong. Charlesjsharp 08:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support WB is OK (see white helmet). --PtrQs 23:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed and/or oversaturated with colour channel clipping in wide areas. --Smial 10:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image does not seem natural to me, too retouched by saturation, which gives this white-blue effect and it unseals the colors of the combination. For me, an IQ image doesn't have to be so retouched--Elryck (talk) 20:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Over the last years I have seen snowy QIC landscapes in yellow, pink, even cyan where someone liked to exaggerate his feeling of colour at sundown. And nobody ever flinched. But now many of you like to mistrust the white of white snow. Have you ever been in the high alps in winter, where there is an infinite amount of light, where everything is of blinding white or deeply colored and brilliant and only sky and shadows are natural blue? How many of you have been at skiing races, where the gates and boundaries of the slope are marked with blue spray so they can tell the difference between the real blue and this pictures? --PtrQs 00:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Since you seem to think we are ignorant PtrQs, let me take the opportunity of mentioning that I have spent more than 130 winter weeks in the Alps and am an ex Alpine ski racer (though not a very successful oneǃ) Charlesjsharp 20:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Objection taken. But being grown up in Tyrol and knowing about the fact, that about 80% of the worldwide population live below 500m altitude [The distribution of human population by altitude] and so seldom have seen more than 10cm of temporary snow (in height!) I suspect that not all really have experience in taking pictures in so much snow. Btw: they didn't have blue spray lines in these days, didn't they? ;-)) Greetings. --PtrQs 22:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment As can be seen by comparing the photo with the original, the whites were too saturated and this unbalances the whole photo. (see https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/b/b2/20200814185513%212020-01-10_Women%27s_Super_G_%282020_Winter_Youth_Olympics%29_by_Sandro_Halank%E2%80%93137.jpg ). The colors give an image that is no longer natural. Such a deep retouching disqualifies the image because the QI must reward the techniques of taking pictures, not computer work.--Elryck 08:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Also with QIC image editing is basically allowed and very often necessary. But the threshold for over-processing is quickly reached and exceeded. The original versions would only have needed an appropriate correction of the white balance, then they would have been fine. --Smial 14:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

.