Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 19 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Âne_bai-noir_en_Mayenne_(4).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Black donkey, Mayenne, France. --Tsaag Valren 21:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Maybe the cutout is unorthodox, but I like it. --Stepro 13:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose crop, sky --Charlesjsharp 11:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blown sky. --Peulle 16:40, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Спуск_к_Среднему_Сакукану_по_ручью_Медвежий.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Kodar, Sakukan gorge, Kodar. Zabaikalsky Krai. August 2014 --Veteran hiker 03:43, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Can we discuss this? Details are washed out --Podzemnik 06:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed --Cvmontuy 19:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Chiesa_San_Bernardo_cimasa_altare_sinistro_Montinelle_Manerba_del_Garda.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination San Bernardo (Bernard of Clairvaux) church in Montinelle. --Moroder 04:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not a QI --Poco a poco 19:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
    I disagree --Moroder 21:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
    Wolfgang, I didn't give any details because as happened sometimes recently I was sure that you would withdraw it. I believe that the focus is much closer than the subjects of the image (the chord looks a bit sharper because it is closer to the camera). Poco a poco 19:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Unless I'm missing something, so do I. Sharp enough at a large enough size to merit passing, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 02:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Wrong focus and/or too low DOF: the central figure is not sharp. Also very weird composition. --Smial 13:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMO the primary text, which is large relative to the photo, and the central sculpture, should not both be heavily blurred for QI (especially in a 20+ MB file and no obvious shooting limitations) --Scotch Mist 15:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp. --Peulle 16:38, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)