Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 16 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Siaröfortet_July_2015_20.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Interior of Siarö fort. --ArildV 08:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment @ArildV: Could you please remove the lens flares at the lights? Then I would change from "Discuss" to "Promotion" again. Best regards. --Code 15:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    • Thank you both for reviews. Unfortunately, I dont know how to remove the lens flares. I am grateful for help.--ArildV 19:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Code 16:12, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Code 16:12, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Пмз-интерьер-18-собор-0502.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Spaso-Preobrazhensky cathedral in Pereslavl, door of the left apse --PereslavlFoto 19:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment With a frontal composition vertical and horizontal lines should be corrected --Moroder 08:47, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment There is really nothing straight in this building. The door cannot be closed in straight line, for example, because the poles tilted. --PereslavlFoto 13:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
      •  Comment I understand that but still, specially the horizontal line setting could be improved imo --Moroder 07:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

 Oppose nothing seems to be aligned on this picture, odd shadow below the gate, I doubt if it fulfils value criteria. --SkywalkerPL 21:30, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

  • The aim was to show the door. This door is not parallel to the poles, and it cannot be closed in full, and therefore it hangs at some angle. Making the door parallel to the camera, we get different distance to the poles. So you are right: nothing was really aligned in this place. What about the shadows, there is a light from the dome above, and a flashlight from beside, and the shadow-looking wet places on the floor. Everything gathered to make such a mess. --PereslavlFoto 22:52, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 10:07, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Montefringilla_Nivalis_Fink_da_Mont_sun_Secëda_da_tl_bec.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination White-winged snowfinch, feeds babybird. On mount Secëda in Val Gardena - altitude 2450 mslm --Moroder 20:16, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Overall too unsharp. Sorry --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 04:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I appreciate your review but I'd like to see some comment from others. IMO it's motion blur in course of action as you see from the added sequence of shots. Cheers --Moroder 08:35, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 10:05, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Pitl_paluc_de_Col_Ciarnacëi.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination in Urtijëi - South Tyrol - Ladin "Pitl paluc de Col Ciarnacëi" --Moroder 13:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Sorry, foreground looks underexposed to me --Superbass 16:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
    Now ok --Superbass 10:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I disagree. According to the light conditions the exposure is perfet, please look at the histogram
  • ✓ Done Sorry, you are right I had uploaded the wrong file Thanks.--Moroder 19:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support new version looks OK. --SkywalkerPL 18:45, 8 August 2015
  •  Support -- Spurzem 06:56, 10 August 2015 (UTC)(UTC)
  •  Oppose Sky too dark and noisy. Daniel Case 00:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment Sounds like a random review: the exposure of the sky is perfect, look at the histogram. No noise whatsoever.

--Moroder 09:42, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

I had meant this for the nomination below. Sorry. Daniel Case 20:30, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 10:05, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Santa_Maria_degli_Angeli_(Rome)_-_Inside_HDR.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Santa Maria degli Angeli (Rome) - Inside HDR --Livioandronico2013 07:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Very nice --Pudelek 10:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. There is a ghost on the right side (bottom) and when using HDR the window should not be blown out and the dark parts should be brighter. --Code 15:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment the HDR don't do miracles,the windows are not burned--Livioandronico2013 19:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support even when it is not a strong support! --Hubertl 22:39, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI, not FP --Atamari 21:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose strongly per Code ! --Jebulon 23:03, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Atamari 21:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)