Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 07 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Speyeria aglaja (Dark green fritillary) male M 2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Dark green fritillary (Argynnis aglaja) female, Melbury Down, Dorset --Charlesjsharp 10:10, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Too much of softened noise on the background --A.Savin 17:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Other views please on the quality of this image, particularly the sharpness of the butterfly itself; some noise reduction of the background has been done, but no other 'softening'. Charlesjsharp 20:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Head and eyes are sharp enough. QI for me.--Ermell 12:28, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I agree with Ermell. --Verum 14:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There are some artifacts of probably cloning or blurring operations in the background, these are unpleasant. The noise level is not the problem, but it should look equal in all areas. The insect itself looks fine. Change to pro if reworked. --Smial 16:07, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks @Smial: , I've uploaded a new version with artefacts removed (I hope I got them all). Charlesjsharp 21:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Thx for rework. If there are still artifacts remaining, well, I can not find them ;-) -- Smial 09:08, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks. I should have left something for you! Charlesjsharp 15:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)