Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 29 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Melrose_Building_--_Houston.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The Melrose building was Houston's first Modern skyscraper. --Jim Evans 12:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose too small resolution for such photo, downsample? --Ezarate 17:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
    •  Comment I've not seen a resolution requirement other than a very small one. It was not a downsample. It was a crop. This picture was taken from about 120 meters away. -- Jim Evans 23:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support OK, I'll say it's good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 05:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good composition and light --Moroder 08:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --LexKurochkin 18:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Taroko_National_Park+fu_tang_chen+002.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Yenzikou, Taroko National Park. --和平奮鬥救地球 06:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Not very sharp, sorry. --Moroder 01:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Considering the light conditions, ok imo. --Kallerna 15:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Kallerna. Some areas of the image seem to have some color noise, which could possibly be reduced. However, this is only distracting in a highly magnified view. The image sharpness is sufficient at a normal viewing distance. The image is a nice example of a long exposure with light traces. --Smial 10:27, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Right part isn't suceeded. No QI for me overall. --Milseburg 13:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Moroder. ----Nefronus 14:16, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support With a 40s exposure to get the light trails, some lack of sharpness and some noise is inevitable. I think the right side provides some context and adds to the composition. @和平奮鬥救地球 and 和平奮鬥救地球: Please add an English translation in the Caption and Description fields. --Tagooty 03:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I agree with Tagooty, Smial and Kallerna. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 20:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --LexKurochkin 18:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)