Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 27 2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination The Achilles-Sport was a motorcycle built from 1953 to 1957 which was commercialized as scooter. -- Spurzem 21:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two Achilles-Sport built from 1953 to 1957 and a Heinkel Tourist in the background -- Spurzem 21:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Cajasol Tower (or Pelli Tower, to the right), the Schindler Tower (in the center) and the harbour basin of the Guadalquivir river in Seville (Spain), photographed in april 2015 from the Barqueta bridge. --Gzzz 21:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dicrurus macrocercus, a small Asian passerine bird of the drongo family Dicruridae. --Tanweer Morshed 19:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough and a little too noisy. Nice structure and bokeh in the background though and good pose. --Slaunger 19:35, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Local market, Setubal, Portugal --Poco a poco 19:07, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Columbus Market, Valencia, Spain --Poco a poco 19:07, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Herbst-Mosaikjungfer - Aeshna mixta, Männchen (male) --Hockei 17:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farsta gård, a historic mansion built in the 1680s. --ArildV 16:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Hockei 17:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Good quality also, but see note, please. Nice picture--Lmbuga 17:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC) Done Thank you both.--ArildV 18:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vista from île Royale, French Guiana. Devil's Island (île du Diable) in the background). --Cayambe 15:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me.--Johann Jaritz 15:30, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination F-15 IAF Israel 2015 Independence Day flyover.
מינוזיג 15:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination F-15 IAF Israel 2015 Independence Day flyover.
-
- Nomination Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Location Dieverzand. Wet spot in an overgrown clearing in the forest.
Famberhorst 15:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC) - Promotion good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Location Dieverzand. Wet spot in an overgrown clearing in the forest.
-
- Nomination Lonely tree on the beach. Location Mirnser Cliff.
Famberhorst 15:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Lonely tree on the beach. Location Mirnser Cliff.
-
- Nomination Part old fishing boat. Location, Port Laaxum.
Famberhorst 15:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC) - Promotion good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Part old fishing boat. Location, Port Laaxum.
-
- Nomination Stairs at Stockholm central station. --ArildV 14:48, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Türbe Kilij Arslan II in Alâeddin Mosque courtyard, Konya, Turkey --Bgag 14:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kifissia park water tank. --C messier 13:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Band shell in Duszniki-Zdrój --Jacek Halicki 07:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parkowa caffe in Duszniki-Zdrój --Jacek Halicki 07:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 16:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pump mineral water in Duszniki-Zdrój --Jacek Halicki 07:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me.--Johann Jaritz 08:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Karrenseilbahn Bergstation-Restaurant --Böhringer 06:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me and even more.--Johann Jaritz 08:49, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Japense cherry (prunus serrulata) in Kungsträdgården. --ArildV 05:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Beautiful motive. Nice composition.--Johann Jaritz 05:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cemetery and parish church the Assumption in Sankt Marein, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western portal of the parish church the Assumption in Sankt Marein, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 05:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Southern portal of the parish church the Assumption in Sankt Marein, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 05:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northern portal of the parish church the Assumption in Sankt Marein, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:30, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 14:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lahad Datu, Sabah: Lahad Datu Flour Mill Sdn Bhd --Cccefalon 00:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Please remove the dustspot in the sky at the left. I'll promote the image once done. --Cayambe 09:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing, Cayambe - I will remove the dustspot as soon as I have a hand on my RAW. However, while looking for the dust spot, I had the feeling, that the sharpness of the image is below my standard and I withdraw my nomination --Cccefalon 09:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kota Marudu, Sabah: Basel Church Kota Kinabalu --Cccefalon 00:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Docks in Hamburg --Martin Kraft 21:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 05:54, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Painting of of Saint Sebastian in the Our Lady church in the Säben Abbey in South Tyrol --Moroder 18:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Very good resolution, but vertical lines are tilted: Perspective distortion. Blurry, lack of sharpness. Underexposed IMO--Lmbuga 21:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Comment The object of the fotograph is the painting. The frame of it is rectangular, so within the object tilted lines are from the painter. The colours are not brisk, but that depends probably on the painting. The wall on the left is overexposed but that would not indicate that the painting itself is overexposed. Sharpness lies a little behind the picture. --ArishG 05:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC) Done Fixed vertical lines (minimal), sharpened and increased the contrast - The wall is not overexposed, look at the histogram. Thanks for the reviews --Moroder 09:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Support I downsampled the image to 7 and to 5 megapixels and it's a good picture and QI IMO--Lmbuga 13:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kungsträdgården Metro station, Stockholm. --ArildV 18:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Dificult picture, but dark areas have too much contrast and are oversaturated IMO. CAs at right upper side.--Lmbuga 21:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Thank you. New version uploaded.--ArildV 06:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
QI for me--Lmbuga 13:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bornean bearded pig (Sus barbatus), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 17:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 05:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Strahl Lake, Brown County State Park, Indiana, USA --Poco a poco 17:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 05:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar with woodcarved polichromed statues of Saint Andrew and Saint Florianus in the Our Lady church in the Säben Abbey in South Tyrol --Moroder 17:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Good IMO, but vertical lines are not straight (see notes)--Lmbuga 21:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Done Fixed verticals according to the walls, the altar is not straight --Moroder 09:26, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Support The picture was good, now it's better IMO. Good quality--Lmbuga 13:43, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel of Vitt, Island of Rügen, Baltic Sea --Derzno 14:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion looks fine --Denkmalhelfer 17:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cemetery at the Saint George church in Wilkanów 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion looks fine --Denkmalhelfer 17:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Swinhoe's striped squirrel (Tamiops swinhoei), Zoo Leipzig, Germany --LC-de 20:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment please The minimum resolution for submissions is 4 megapixels?--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Please don't apply this as a rule as long it is not agreed. --LC-de 07:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)* OK thank you.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 07:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --C messier 12:35, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Swinhoe's striped squirrel (Tamiops swinhoei), Zoo Leipzig, Germany --LC-de 20:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Théâtre, Dougga. By User:Agnieszkaphoto --Touzrimounir 08:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Both sides leaning out, it needs a perspective correction Poco a poco 09:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Théâtre, Dougga. By User:Agnieszkaphoto --Touzrimounir 08:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arc de triomphe, Dougga. By User:Agnieszkaphoto --Touzrimounir 08:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --C messier 11:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus in Avignon --Billy69150 09:37, 17 April 2015 (UTC) Sky blown out, CA on the tree, less contrast --Denkmalhelfer 17:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
-
- Nomination Third lodge chapel in Mielec --Jacek Halicki 07:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Sorry: Inappropriate color space, tilt and perspective distortion. --F. Riedelio 09:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination First lodges chapel in Mielec 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)* Comment unfavourable crop. --Hubertl 10:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC) See comments from Hubertl and partly too dark. --Denkmalhelfer 17:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
-
- Nomination 460004 at Doncaster. Mattbuck 06:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
no CC-BY-SA copyrights in EXIF-Data, Redlink in categories and unfavorable image structure: disturbing elements (fence and mast) and incomplete primary subject. --F. Riedelio 09:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination boustrophedon archaic greek inscriptions, Gortys, Crete, Greece.--Jebulon 18:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment IMO perspective correction is necessary.--XRay 16:36, 17 April 2015 (UTC) Done, XRay, like this ? --Jebulon 16:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Support Yes, IMO it's OK now. --XRay 15:41, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:ZSL_London_-_Ring-tailed_lemur_(01).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta) in London Zoo. --KTC 16:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Feet too unsharp. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 16:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Support Feet are sharp enough for me. I ask to discuss. -- Spurzem 19:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Weak support --Lmbuga 20:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Support looks fine --Denkmalhelfer 18:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC) - Support OK for QI.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 10:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Nice portrait. Alvesgaspar 11:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --C messier 12:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
File:2015-03-22_Air_Berlin_Takeoff_at_Berlin-Tegel_by_sebaso.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Air Berlin Takeoff at Berlin-Tegel, Boeing 737 D-ABKT --Sebaso 19:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Sorry, the sky is overexposed--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 19:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment please check again on commons detail page with white background - its not overexposed. --Sebaso 20:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment OK! In that case, I'll adjust my judgment in the discussion.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Well it does seem over-exposed to me too. --Charlesjsharp 20:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Well, the sky isn't overexposed, it is just a dull day. But - this picture shows actually only sky. And the parts that aren't sky are overprocessed with strong artifacts of what I assume might be caused of oversharpening naturally blurred areas (blurred by turbulent air) --LC-de 11:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 22:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Pennsylvania Route 487 northbound south of Stillwater.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Pennsylvania Route 487. Jakec 18:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
OpposeSorry Jakec below 4mpx, there is new rules (see QI talk page)--Christian Ferrer 14:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)- It was nominated before that rule. Jakec 11:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral --Christian Ferrer 21:05, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- It was nominated before that rule. Jakec 11:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose CA(s), poor detail, 2,123 × 1,504 pixels (see notes)--Lmbuga 16:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose I'd like to add unclear composition to the lmbugas opposing arguments - beside the resolution one which is still not agreed. Composition should receive more attention than it gets now as this says more about quality than the resolution. --LC-de 07:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 22:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Störche Steinwedel (3).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Two young white storks. --Hydro 07:14, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Cayambe 11:12, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I'm not convinced about the sharpness here --Poco a poco 14:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose looks not sharp --Denkmalhelfer 12:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- I uploaded a sharpened version. --Hydro 19:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Unbalanced IMO, but...--Lmbuga 16:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 22:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Stryhanka Tyshycia Windbreak.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Windbreak between Stryhanka and Tyshycia villages. --Mykola Swarnyk 05:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC) * Comment please do a perspective correction..! --Hubertl 06:41, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
DoneMykola Swarnyk 07:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC) - Decline
- Support Good quality. --Hubertl 08:07, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose below 4mpx --Christian Ferrer 13:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Bigger size added. --Mykola Swarnyk 15:33, 18 April 2015 (UTC) ok but it's a bit unsharp with lack of fine details, sorry --Christian Ferrer 16:05, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Really, too unsharp. CAs (see note as example). Underexposed areas IMO. Sorry, nothing is QI IMO: The road is cropped or too tight at left (poor composition)--Lmbuga 17:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment @Christian Ferrer: : Mykola Swarnyk responded. Just for fairness.--Hubertl 13:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, haven´t seen that you´ve already answered, Christian! --Hubertl 13:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I totally accepting that. Thanks for revision! Mykola Swarnyk 22:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, haven´t seen that you´ve already answered, Christian! --Hubertl 13:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 22:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Benton Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania in April (1).JPG
[edit]- Nomination Benton Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 18:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Hubertl 00:44, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Oppose below 4mpx--Christian Ferrer 15:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Christian Ferrer the limiti for 4 mpx started from 14 April --Livioandronico2013 19:50, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Yes and we are the 19 April and the image is still candidate, until it's writen in the guideline it's the same rules for all candidates in this page, I was not in favor of this rules and I'm sorry that Jakec was not invited for to vote and that the vote be stopped so fast. --Christian Ferrer 08:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
But surely if it was nominated before, it would be subject to the grandfather clause. Jakec 18:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC) - Neutral --Christian Ferrer 21:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor detail (see note). Too noise reduction IMO. CAs (see notes). 2,256 × 1,504 pixels (not 4 megapixels). It seems dark IMO. A bit cyan--Lmbuga 17:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Oppose agree to Lmbuga --Denkmalhelfer 18:25, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 22:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Irisbus Cristalis ETB 12 n°115 TCL Place Carnot.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Trolleybus in Limoges --Billy69150 15:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Tilt/perspective issues. --C messier 10:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC) Done --Billy69150 10:39, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Suffers from pincushion distortion on the left, and there is a lot of almost empty space above the subject. Mattbuck 07:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Why is this image in CR? --C messier 09:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Pincushion distortion on the left. The car of the bottom right is disturbing--Lmbuga 17:36, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Minor issues but very good dynamic with this bus. Kvardek du 19:51, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Pincushion distortion not fixed. --C messier 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose as for lmbuga -- Smial 11:47, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 22:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Sea Fishing, Batticaloa.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Fishermen return to seashore --AntanO 18:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Touzrimounir 18:35, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree: Colour noise in the sea part and posterisation in the sky. --Cccefalon 19:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support I can't see any relevant chromatic noise or posterization. Alvesgaspar 14:23, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Great composition but Cccefalon is right. On the left side in the sky there is some heavy posterization. It's really a pity. Otherwise the picture was FP-worthy in my eyes. I don't know if that's fixable. --Code 09:20, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose coclour noise on dark parts. --Denkmalhelfer 12:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Colour noise in the sea part and posterisation in the sky. As Cccefalon--Lmbuga 17:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Posterized sun evident at thumbnail size. Daniel Case 22:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 22:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Hoverfly April 2014-1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A female hoverfly (Epistrophe eligans) on a Narrow leaved Cistus flower. The only one fly of this species that I have seen in Portugal. Alvesgaspar 21:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Looking at Wikipedia etc. I think this is a different species. --Charlesjsharp 12:09, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Info No, it is not. It was identified by an expert (diptera.info) Alvesgaspar 19:37, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Alvesgaspar: : I think it would be relevant to add details about the identification process on the file page, preferably with a link to the discussion where the identification is established. -- Slaunger 16:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Slaunger: Done, it is not possible to insert links into this template. Gerard Pennards is an expert on syrphid flies -- Alvesgaspar 13:26, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Alvesgaspar: I do not understand; what do you mean by you cannot add links 'into this template'? It is the file page I am referring to. That is the place to keep such informative details about the identification, and I do not see that any such information has been added to the file page. -- Slaunger 18:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Ahh, you had added it on the talk page? I have now integrated it into the file description. -- Slaunger 18:39, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Alvesgaspar: I do not understand; what do you mean by you cannot add links 'into this template'? It is the file page I am referring to. That is the place to keep such informative details about the identification, and I do not see that any such information has been added to the file page. -- Slaunger 18:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Slaunger: Done, it is not possible to insert links into this template. Gerard Pennards is an expert on syrphid flies -- Alvesgaspar 13:26, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Alvesgaspar: : I think it would be relevant to add details about the identification process on the file page, preferably with a link to the discussion where the identification is established. -- Slaunger 16:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support the subject is sharp. The identification seems valid. --Hubertl 16:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 21:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 22:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)