Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 24 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Cathedrale_de_Seville.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Cathedrale de Seville. Lithography 1857 year. --Dmitry Makeev 11:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  OpposeIt's tilted and there is some CA. Can you fix at least the tilt please? --Podzemnik 21:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Correction --Dmitry Makeev 06:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 08:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Ineligible for QI: not a Commoners original work. --MB-one (talk) 23:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  CommentYes, lithographs from the private collection. My scans. You can see in the downloads - five scans of lithographs. --Dmitry Makeev 08:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]

File:Cervezas_de_camboya.jpg

[edit]

File:Cervezas de camboya.jpg

  • Nomination Beers of Cambodia. --Dmitry Makeev 06:51, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Please upload a JPEG file --Ermell 10:24, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
    Uploaded in format jpg. File 57 MPx --Dmitry Makeev 11:30, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Nice work. --Ermell 20:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry but the file was nominated for deletion. Let's wait for the results. If the file stays, you can nominate again later on --Podzemnik 11:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose deleted -- Piotr Bart 11:40, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Sbarro_GTC,_GIMS_2019,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(GIMS0795).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sbarro GTC at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 09:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Websteralive 17:00, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose I think that the car I overexposed. Please discuss and excuse me if I am wrong. -- Spurzem 19:34, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose per Spurzem - too bright. -- Ikan Kekek 06:37, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment fixed the exposure. --MB-one 13:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Only the front of the car is sharp and the noise is disturbing.--Ermell 19:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:31, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Bos_taurus_(Huergas_de_Babia).002_-_Cabrillanes_(Leon).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bos taurus (cow) in Huergas de Babia (Cabrillanes, León, Spain). --Drow male 09:52, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Websteralive 16:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose Nice cow but I see not enough color in this image. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 19:37, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose per Spurzem - washed out color and problems with noise. -- Ikan Kekek 06:46, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 14:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

==

[edit]
  • Nomination Portrait of Aida Overton Walker.
    --Indrajit Das 12:38, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think we need a proper source for this. What is the original painting based on? --Podzemnik 21:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose agree rules say created by wikimedian Seven Pandas 17:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:30, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

==

[edit]
  • Nomination Portrait of Berta Cáceres.
    --Indrajit Das 11:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, not his own work --Eatcha 17:14, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose source? rules say created by wikimedian Seven Pandas 17:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:29, 24 April 2019 (UTC)