Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 22 2014

• 
  • Nomination Ferruginous Duck, Aythya nyroca, at Martin Mere, UK.jpg. --Baresi franco 23:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Aathavan jaffna 01:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roller coaster at PortAventura, Salou, Tarragona, Catalonia. --Lmbuga 18:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marbled Teal, Marmaronetta angustirostris, at Martin Mere, UK. --Baresi franco 18:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bake house in Niedereisenhausen --Hydro 18:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline The sky is gone, sorry --Poco a poco 21:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Japanese lantern in the gardens of the musée départemental Albert-Kahn, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine, France --JLPC 16:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palmarium in the gardens of the musée départemental Albert-Kahn, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine, France --JLPC 16:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Japanese lantern in the garden of the musée départemental Albert-Kahn, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine, France --JLPC 16:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West Ruislip station. Mattbuck 16:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Aathavan jaffna 16:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Siloetten in Løgten north of Aarhus, architect CF Moller in collaboration with Christian Carlsen Architects. --Villy Fink Isaksen 15:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mireval, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 15:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, nice landscape, even if the city is a little far. QI anyway.--Jebulon 23:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mireval, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 14:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 16:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination School in Serebryanye Prudy, Moscow Oblast, Russia --A.Savin 14:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Aathavan jaffna 14:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Osyotr River in Serebryanye Prudy, Moscow Oblast, Russia --A.Savin 14:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Aathavan jaffna 14:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porch of Hoshang Shah's Tomb, Mandu, India --Bgag 13:58, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 14:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mausoleum of Hoshang Shah, Mandu, India --Bgag 13:58, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination nil manel flower. --Aathavan jaffna 13:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality but be careful : this file is just above the 2 required Mo. --JLPC 16:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 16:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House at lake Öjön. Ljungdalen (Berg municipality, Jämtland county). --ArildV 11:50, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support good --A.Savin 14:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Round hay bales in Lower Bavaria, Germany. --High Contrast 10:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mokre (Mokrau), Silesia - lime kiln --Pudelek 09:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bujaków (Bujakow), Upper Silesia - wayside cross from 1884 y. --Pudelek 09:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 16:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Typical mountain landscape north of Lake Öjön, Ljungdalen (Berg municipality, Jämtland county). --ArildV 09:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Môle Saint Louis Lighthouse, Sète, France. --Christian Ferrer 07:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 14:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Wheel Snail, Zethalia zelandica --Llez 04:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Maathavan 12:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saigon river, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 03:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support (weak) the clouds are pretty close to overexposure, but OK for QI. --A.Savin 13:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tapu Island, Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 03:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Maathavan 12:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Notre-Dame Basilica, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 03:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Interesting, with tripod? --The Photographer 13:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shooting range, Reunification Palace, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 03:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Difficult shot, but well managed IMO. Flaws are minor, even the persp. dist. (.--Jebulon 15:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Garden of the Reunification Palace, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 03:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 16:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Карвендельгебирге и Евромост -- Vitold Muratov 15:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose poor sharpness and strange retouching issues (I'm going to make notices). --A.Savin 13:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 185142 at Liverpool South Parkway. Mattbuck 23:02, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Unsharp and distorted on the left. --High Contrast 11:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 465019 at Waterloo East. Mattbuck 23:02, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose the train seems unfocused. Magenta CA --A.Savin 13:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rue des Thermopyles, 14th arrondissement of Paris, France. --Myrabella 22:35, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Barbara's Garrison Church, Deepcut --Lewis Hulbert 19:32, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clitoria ternatea in jaffna, sri lanka --Aathavan jaffna 15:42, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of a wooden door of the Residenz, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.--Jebulon 14:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fabrègues, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 11:31, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK for QI; but I've the impression that there is a tiny bit "reddish" veil on the picture (maybe I'm wrong and the WB is fine). --A.Savin 13:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC) A.Savin,  Done, new version uploaded --Christian Ferrer 18:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
    Yes, appears a bit better. --A.Savin 13:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic View of Caracas --The Photographer 04:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Maathavan 07:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Food from Margarita Island --The Photographer 04:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality but a better description would be nice (e.g. type of fish, maybe some more categories). --ArildV 07:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
     Done Thanks --The Photographer 15:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: St. Nikolaus von Tolentino - Detail of the southeast corner of the church, showing the sacristy which was added to the building in the years 1900-1903. --Cccefalon 04:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A smallholders rice paddy in the Padas River Valley, Sabah, Malaysia --Cccefalon 04:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: War room, Reunification Palace, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 04:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Dragonfly (Orthetrum sabina), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 04:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice dragonfly --Charlesjsharp 20:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: St. Nikolaus von Tolentino - Side altar right of High Altar, showing Nikolaus of Tolentino and the St. Augustine. It was made in 1708 by Master Hamecher. --Cccefalon 04:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: St. Nikolaus von Tolentino - Choir with the four altar --Cccefalon 04:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hot air ballons over Goreme in Capadocia --Jbribeiro1 01:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Eisbach surfer --Martin Falbisoner 20:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Palace in Ornontowice, Poland --Halavar 20:53, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: South Fork Eel river --Adbar 19:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tree in a flowerpot (Fisheye perspective), French Garden, Celle, Germany. --NorbertNagel 18:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Polychromed statue of Jesus in the Lourdes chapel of the parish church of Feldthurns in South Tyrol - other angle of vision --Moroder 17:14, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: St. Nikolaus von Tolentino - Side altar left of High Altar, showing Maria with Jesus andthe St. Hubertus --Cccefalon 17:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Forsbach, Germany: "Pusteblume" a sculpture of the artist Robin Kurka, 2013. Installation in front of the parish hall of the protestant church --Cccefalon 17:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Nailsea & Backwell station. Mattbuck 16:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Fishbourne Roman Palace. Mattbuck 16:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Larpool Viaduct. Mattbuck 16:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: District Line train interior. Mattbuck 16:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cherwell Valley Line near Kings Sutton. Mattbuck 16:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Painting of Ascension of Maria by Stephan Kessler (1622–1700) around AD 1660 in the parish church of Feldthurns in South Tyrol --Moroder 16:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Eisack river in Brixen from Ponte Aquila --Uoaei1 16:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Eisack river in Brixen from Ponte Aquila --Uoaei1 16:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Manchots au parc de oiseaux de Villars-les-Dombes en 2014. --Agamitsudo 15:38, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review Blurred and shadowns are  Underexposed, need more sharpening --The Photographer 18:31, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nerium oleander (அரளிப் பூ (en:arali)) --Aathavan jaffna 11:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Northwest fassade of St. Michael in Sandakan, Sabah --Cccefalon 08:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dome of Melk Abbey church with the fresco New Jerusalem --Uoaei1 08:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: St. Nikolaus von Tolentino - The modern brace between church and former monastery --Cccefalon 07:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: National Archives of Finland, Helsinki (renomination after improvement) -- Alvesgaspar 21:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Please have a look to the perspective at the left.--XRay 06:11, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The main altar of the Peterskirche, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.--Jebulon 20:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion I think there is a little overexpoed part without details (see note) --Christian Ferrer 17:25, 18 April 2014 (UTC) Thanks for review ! I've tried a tricky solution (cloning), I hope it is better. This picture is not that sharp, and the perspective is a bit strange, but I think it can pass. Thoughts ?--Jebulon 15:27, 19 April 2014 (UTC)  Support Ok for me. Indeed not that sharp but well done for the cloning part. --Christian Ferrer 15:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination fruits and seeds of rosemary - Fruits et graines de Romarin --Ercé 09:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Please try to remove strange things (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 18:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--Ercé 06:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)  Support oups, sorry, I forgot you, ok now --Christian Ferrer 16:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Dalian_Liaoning_China_Goliathus-goliatus-01.jpg

• Nomination Dalian, Liaoning, China: Goliathus goliatus, exhibited at Dalian TV Tower --Cccefalon 13:15, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
• Withdrawn  SupportGood quality. --Aathavan jaffna 13:58, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

 Oppose Too dark imo and therefore lack of detail. --Kadellar 14:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

 Oppose With Kadellar--Jebulon 15:02, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

 Comment I cannot enhance quality considerably; so I do agree and withdraw the image. --Cccefalon 13:51, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Triumph Tiger 800 MY 2012.jpg

• Nomination Triumph Tiger 800 -- H005 20:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Comment dark areas underexposed (lost shadows) --P e z i 21:52, 5 April 2014 (UTC) Not done --P e z i 14:46, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
   fixed That was deliberate, as I liked it bettter that way. but I've now lightened it up if that's preferred. --H005 23:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support much better now (no need to hide this beautiful engine in the shadow :-)) --P e z i 20:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 18:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Wayside_Madonna_Selva.JPG

• Nomination Baroque wooden polychromed Wayside Madonna in the center of the town of Sëlva Gherdëina. --Moroder 12:23, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose Considering the fact that it is a f/11 photo, taken during daylight, I have to decline because parts of the sculpture are not in focus. Sorry. --Cccefalon 14:54, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  I disagree, up front the foto is not in focus but the single focus point is exactly on the face which is emphasized in this torso that way. There are tons of QI which don't have the whole image in focus --Moroder 21:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose DoF problems, I am sorry --The Photographer 23:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

 Comment The intention was to focus on the face, the head (the back and the front are blurried on purpose) otherwise I wouldn't have taken a torso crop, but seems that noone wants to understand this --Moroder 13:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

 Comment I'm afraid you failed in your attempt. As for me, only the neck (not the face) is sharp...--Jebulon 14:51, 18 April 2014 (UTC)I counted this as an  Oppose --Cccefalon 14:09, 21 April 2014 (UTC)no sorry, it was just a comment.--Jebulon 14:48, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

I think so too --The Photographer 23:40, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 14:06, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Sheffield_Steel_Rollergirls_vs_Nothing_Toulouse_-_2014-03-29_-_8781.jpg

• Nomination Roller derby, jammer from blue avoid the blocker --PierreSelim 06:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Noisy and artefacts. --Cccefalon 14:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC) Easier to have a landscape (or a church) by daylight at ISO 100 ... --PierreSelim 16:35, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
   Support Ok for me given the conditions. Pleclown 11:21, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
   Support Remember a selective denoising in background --The Photographer 22:59, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 14:06, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Monestir_de_St._Benedict_(Sant_Benet)_de_Montserrat_-_Montserrat_2014_(3).JPG

• Nomination Monastery of St. Benedict, Montserrat, Spain --Jbribeiro1 02:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Oppose blurred right half, tower is tilted --A.Savin 09:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
   Support It was a bit soft, but that was easy to fix. Tower looks straight to me. --Iifar 17:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

 Support Need more DoF, cut on top (see rood). But This image IMHO is QI --The Photographer 20:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

•  Support QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 11:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 13:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Kohlberg_Baden-Württemberg_Germany_Panoramic-View-01b.jpg

• Nomination Panoramic view upon rule of the thirds of the village of Kohlberg, Germany --Cccefalon 07:26, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Both sides leaning out Poco a poco 08:48, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
   Question Where?? According to the metal lamp posts the view is rectilinear ... --Cccefalon 09:20, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
  The right side maybe, I was deceived, but the left side needs definitely a correction Poco a poco 17:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
   Comment The composition of this version is ok by me. It would be interesting, whether Poco a poco see the same problems with the other two versions too. --Milseburg 13:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
  Fixed I uploaded a revised version. --Cccefalon 19:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
  Sorry Cccefalon, but I still see the problem Poco a poco 20:29, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
   Comment I don't want to fight about that, but in my opinion the lamp posts on the left side are now sufficiently rectilinar. I made an annotation for the area where I choosed my marks I used the lamp posts because they bear a sufficiently long line to make a decision. Also the church tower in the background is straight. Feel free to send it to CR. --Cccefalon 09:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
  Ok, agree with you on that, a CR makes sense. I still see problems in the far left, those houses are not straight  Oppose Poco a poco 20:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
   Support Long in this section ends by becoming Cole Sear, we began to see things that are not there. I speak for myself even :) --The Photographer 20:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 11:08, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 13:52, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Stare_pojazdy_w_Bolszych_Kotach.JPG

• Nomination: Old vehicles. Bolshiye Koty, Siberia, Russia. --Halavar 22:19, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
• Review  Support ok --Cccefalon 03:37, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose I find it overexosed. Especially some parts of the truck. Besides, a better description and image location would be highly appreciated. --User:Struup
   Done Fixed overexposed parts. As for the other things: geolocation is not necessary in QI (in contrast to VI) and I can't add it, because there are no precise maps of this part of world. Description is good. --Halavar 16:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 13:59, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Berlin-Friedrichshagen_-_Straßenschild_Bölschestraße.jpg

• Nomination: Berlin-Friedrichshagen: sign of Bölschestraße --Taxiarchos228 18:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
• Review
•  Support Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:29, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks underexposed IMO. Elements at left are disturbing to me. And it needs a perspective correction.--Jebulon 19:01, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
  it doesn't need respectively it has already, a full correction wouldn't look realistic --Taxiarchos228 11:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 14:00, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Bristol MMB «M6 Bristol East Junction.jpg

• Nomination Bristol East Junction. Mattbuck 13:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion I made an annotation, how it could be a QI by altering the crop. --Cccefalon 13:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
  Poco is right about the overall quality, I don't challenge that. But the very left is too blurry and needs a crop IMO. I won't sent to CR for now but I would appreciate, if you consider that isue, Matt. --Cccefalon 18:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose I hoped for a reaction. Unfortunately I have to send it to CR now, because the blurry left side is not ok for a QI IMO. --Cccefalon 11:25, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
  It's only been two days since you suggested a crop! I don't check QI that religiously. As for a crop, I did look at it, but I think the left side adds balance. Besides, the reflection is in focus. Mattbuck 21:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
  Don't be upset. As usual, I had waited much longer but as a Poco bypassed my comment I had no other chance than sending it to CR yesterday evening because Poco's promotion had made a QI this morning. That's why I don't like getting bypassed. --Cccefalon 05:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
  Ah, ok, fair enough. I thought it had just been sent to CR because of your comment not getting an answer in 2 days, didn't notice Poco's comment. My apologies, I was clearly not thinking straight. I blame it on the York Fruits sitting on my desk, teasing me with their tastiness, knowing I can't open them as they're a gift to be given. Mattbuck 07:08, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
   Neutral I won't be a grinch for reason of a disputable crop. I change to a neutral vote. --Cccefalon 16:11, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 14:01, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Dorcus parallelipipedus Woblitz01.jpg

• Nomination Dorcus parallelipipedus --Kulac 10:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality. --Gidip 05:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
  

 Oppose DoF too shallow - only a small part of the beetle is in focus. Also some noise. --Cccefalon 07:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 CommentBecause of reviewers like you only pictures with objects perfectly perpendicular to the lens (like butterflies) are promoted in Commons. I think this is very wrong and limiting and neglects the whole beautiful concept of perspective in photography. Half of the beetle is very sharp. Regarding the noise - you can view the image at 60% or 70% and have a sufficiently large image with not too much noise. Great image for QI IMO. Gidip (talk) 07:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

•  Support QI for me. It is a female. --Archaeodontosaurus 15:38, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Do I understand right? It's a QI for you because it is a female beetle???? --Cccefalon 16:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
• No, I'm sure this lady is lovely, but this is the image that is QI. Sex is not mentioned in the caption, it's a shame. In this species you should see the two tubercles on the top of the head (see note). --Archaeodontosaurus 09:45, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 14:04, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Isatis_microcarpa_1.jpg

• Nomination Isatis microcarpa --Gidip 09:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose Mostly out of focus. --Mattbuck 21:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
  It's called "perspective". Look at the F number and the lens type. --Gidip 07:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing really sharp. --Smial 13:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • It doesn't have to be "really sharp" at 100% Gidip 15:47, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 13:56, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009.JPG

• Nomination: Exhibition of superheroes of the comic in the Museo Principe Felipe de Valencia-Spain --alberto-g-rovi 05:17, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
• Review
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too noisy, Vanoot59 17:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
• Too much on the left IMO, and does this pass copyright muster? Unless this statue is a permanent installation, surely it fails FoP? Mattbuck 21:44, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 13:43, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Zeta toy MMB 05.jpg

• Nomination A wolf-style dildo. Mattbuck 07:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
• Interesting - I didn't knew that animal penis replica are on sold. But the right side is not sharp because of shallow DoF  Oppose. --Cccefalon 08:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

  It looks sharp to me - it was taken at f/13, so I don't think DOF is an issue. Mattbuck 21:15, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

• DOF is OK IMHO, but there's CA around it that should be removed (purple on the top, green on the lower side). -- H005 14:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC))

  I don't see it, certainly nothing which would be decline-worthy at 100%. Mattbuck 21:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Unsufficiant sharpness and lighting. Distracting background. -- Smial 13:11, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 13:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC)