Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 21 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Ciconia_ciconia.005_-_Valverde_de_la_Virgen_(Leon).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ciconia ciconia (white stork) on the Church of Santa Engracia, in Valverde de la Virgen (León, Spain).
    --Drow male 07:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 16:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lots of CA, quite unsharp. --Podzemnik 21:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --MB-one 07:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 17:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The halos are quite visible.--Peulle 22:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 Comment I wonder again and again what is hailed here as a quality image, and what tiny defects as in this picture here are sought to knock it off. Sometimes I get the impression that pictures promoted by me are basically unusable for some other people. -- Spurzem 16:31, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support The user has at least tried to remove the CAs as you can see at the grey edges. But the picture is o.k for me.--Ermell 19:12, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Columba livia domestica.402 - La Virgen del Camino (Leon).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Columba livia domestica (domestic pidgeon), flying from its nest (where there is a couple of eggs), in La Virgen del Camino (municipality of Valverde de la Virgen, León, Spain).
    --Drow male 07:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Chenspec 14:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. It's such a random shot, I couldn't see the bird for like 5 seconds. --Podzemnik 21:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The bird is way too small. --MB-one 07:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unclear subject, low details.--Peulle 22:05, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 11:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia_Administrator.svg

[edit]

  • Nomination Icon that typically represents the administrators on Wikipedia. By User:ANGELUS --Piotr Bart 16:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 09:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too simple for me to be QI --Podzemnik 21:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support the mop is far from being a simple shape. --MB-one 10:44, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:50, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Monuments_with_history_behind.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination By User:Sandiplondhe --Piotr Bart 18:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Detail is good but it is tilted the crop is on top too thight --Poco a poco 19:27, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 09:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
  • As said, not a QI to me until the mentioned issues are not addressed --Poco a poco 17:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 21:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Sorry, the nominator can't vote. --XRay 17:55, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad crop, building partially hidden. Yann 07:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
     Comment Centre vertical 0.5° tilted CW (crop tool). I suppose it would have been difficult to get the whole left hand side of building in because of the tree border, so it probably would have been nice to have more of that tree to make sense of where it was cropped. Acabashi 08:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Not vertical toward the left, but instead slanting forward while going down. -- Ikan Kekek 09:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me. Where should be the important lacks? -- Spurzem 14:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please choose a better filename. --XRay 05:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Description missing, top left too dark, perspective correction necessary. - -XRay 17:48, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 11:51, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Helichrysum_italicum_spp_serotinum.002_-_Islas_Cies.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Helichrysum italicum spp serotinum (curry plant), in Cíes Islands, province of Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain. --Drow male 04:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose The flowers in the middle are ok, those at the bottom too blurry, they are distracting, can you please crop them? --Poco a poco 13:02, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
     Support for me now Poco a poco 17:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Not done within a week. --XRay 05:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. --Chenspec 09:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - You disagree with what part? To me, this is a random composition, the unsharp flowers at the bottom are distracting, and we see half an insect on the right. I think on both composition and overall sharpness, this is not a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 07:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  • weak  Support DOF appears to be intentional, and somewhat low, but still acceptable. --Smial 13:54, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others -- Piotr Bart 21:29, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment - I cropped it as Poco asked -- Eatcha 13:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ikan. Simply cropping away the parts that were captured badly does not work.--Peulle 11:12, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 11:52, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Zitting cisticola feeding its chicks.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2017. By User:Budi Santoso Adji, the birds in this image is Zitting cisticola (Cisticola juncidis), the image shows the parent is feeding its child. --Aldnonymous 12:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Cvmontuy 05:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now. Species, or at least genus identification would be goo. Also, meaningful file name and description. --Podzemnik 22:47, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The technical quality isn't bad, but this is Commons. Sorting and categorizing images is an important part of that.--Peulle 08:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. Kesihanlah (i.e., pity), I like the message, but that isn't really the point of Commons. Photos need to be accurately described and catalogued, and then viewers will be affected however they are. -- Ikan Kekek 08:47, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Podzemnik, Peulle, and Ikan Kekek: , I've changed the file name as per (en:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds#Asking_for_species_name_and_genus) and updated the description as "Zitting cisticola (Cisticola juncidis) feeding its childs, these birds is member of Genus Cisticola, Family of Cisticolidae, and Order of Passeriformes". Is this okay now?Aldnonymous 07:22, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
    Addendum I also fixed the category by adding the correct category.Aldnonymous 07:35, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I'm onboard.--Peulle 09:47, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

 Comment Is it of any consequence that this photo has no EXIF details... I downloaded it and still can't find any. How do we know that the uploader of this image is the author? Acabashi 13:28, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

The only information I can gather is This image came originally to Wikimedia Indonesia ([1] and ([2]). As WMID member Rachmat04 can you give us a bit of detail?Aldnonymous 13:54, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment - I've crossed out my opposing vote, because the reason for it no longer exists; however, I'm not sure whether I should support a photo without EXIF details. Is it OK to do so? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
    Afaik its okay, if WMID/Wikimedia Indonesia did confirm the ownership of those files.Aldnonymous 02:14, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
  • But is there a QIC guideline on whether photos without EXIF data can or should be promoted? -- Ikan Kekek 05:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Afaik no such rule ever existed, Ikan Kekek.Aldnonymous 08:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
  • OK,  Support - Good quality. The filename should be changed, though, because the English plural of child is children. -- Ikan Kekek 15:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done.Aldnonymous 16:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Offsprings of birds are called chicken --Moroder 21:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Chicks, not chickens. -- Ikan Kekek 06:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Please write the file name, Moroder, so I can move it per your suggestion.Aldnonymous 04:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
I suggest: "Zitting cisticola feeding its chicken.jpg" --Moroder 07:42, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Its chicks, please! These are not chickens. -- Ikan Kekek 09:36, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Thaaanks, sorry --Moroder 12:32, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Rename done, Moroder.Aldnonymous 13:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Aldnonymous 15:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)