Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 20 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Chapman's Peak Drive, a scenic road between Cape Town and Hout Bay. --Kallerna 04:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice light.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Japanese Cherry (Prunus serrulata) at Sentmaring Park in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:14, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Special. Flowers here and there perhaps on the white (light) side.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cut open Cucumis melo(Muskmelon) (by Filo gèn') --Boothsift 01:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forwark building north of the castle ruin Leonstein, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Field, meadow and forest at «Am Kåte», Gaisrückenstrasse, Winklern, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine on Gaisrückenstrasse in Winklern, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:15, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vernal orchard with pear tree avenue «Am Kåte», Gaisrückenstrasse, Winklern, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:15, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beekeeping Oliva on Gaisrückenstrasse in Winklern, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:15, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Markideio Theatre, Paphos, Cyprus --Podzemnik 00:11, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wilkin River close to its confluence with Makarora River, New Zealand --Podzemnik 00:11, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of Terra Santa Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church, Larnaca, Cyprus --Podzemnik 00:11, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Terra Santa Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church, Larnaca, Cyprus --Podzemnik 00:11, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Column of Terra Santa Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church, Larnaca, Cyprus --Podzemnik 00:11, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurasian moose (Alces alces), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 18:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry but I find it oversturated with not enough detail --Podzemnik 21:21, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Hague-NL, street view Bierkade-Groenewegje from bridge across Wagenstraat-Stationstraat --Michielverbeek 17:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Quality photograph. Acabashi 18:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Hague-NL, street view: the Turfmarkt --Michielverbeek 17:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Well balanced, dramatic and quality. Acabashi 18:20, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Hague-NL, skyline from Laan van Reagan en Gorbatsjov --Michielverbeek 17:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 21:25, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windmills in Seli Ampelou, Crete --C messier 16:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House in Voila, Crete --C messier 16:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Front wheel of an Audi R8 V10 Decennium at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 14:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Headphones AGK K701 By User:Niabot --Eatcha 14:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Below minimum resolution --MB-one 15:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Menger Sponge By User:Niabot --Eatcha 14:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 14:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kinheim, Burgstraße, remains of the castle --Berthold Werner 12:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Admins best friend By User:Niabot ( I found this while nominating FB copyvios for deletion ) --Eatcha 11:46, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose There is a template "The factual accuracy of this file is disputed". Apart from that, I don't find it good, having 2 scripts there is not appealing to me --Podzemnik 21:25, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agricultural ribbed roller. --Acabashi 09:56, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cottage garden border. --Acabashi 09:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St Nicholas, Ash-with-Westmarsh steps. --Acabashi 09:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rosette of Notre-Dame Cathedral in Strasbourg (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:49, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mammillaria spinosissima var. 'rubrispina' ('Super Red'). By User:Rationalobserver --Yann 06:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Quality. Acabashi 10:25, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Exhibited at the Salon of 1877. Purchased by the State in 1879.. Transfer of ownership of the State in 2004. Placed initially in the garden of the Grand Rond, then in front of the Museum. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Yann 06:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 14:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Earl Mountains from Mirror Lakes in Fiordland National Park, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 06:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount Haidinger in Aoraki/Mount Cook National Park, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tasman Lake in Aoraki/Mount Cook National Park, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 06:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hollyford River in Fiordland National Park, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good for me. --Rbrechko 16:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old town hall in Haßfurt --Ermell 05:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Vitus and St. Michael's Church in Heiligenstadt in Upper Franconia --Ermell 05:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:20, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Community library in Heiligenstadt in Upper Franconia --Ermell 05:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inn Heiligenstadter Hof in Heiligenstadt in Upper Franconia --Ermell 05:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination (Anemone blanda) Inflorescence.
--Famberhorst 05:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination (Anemone blanda) Inflorescence.
-
- Nomination Zwettepoel, (Frysk) Swettepoel. View of the lake and the islands.
--Famberhorst 05:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC) - Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 06:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Zwettepoel, (Frysk) Swettepoel. View of the lake and the islands.
-
- Nomination Goingarijp. Wind engine.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Goingarijp. Wind engine.
-
- Nomination Zwettepoel, (Frysk) Swettepoel. Path along the lake.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC) - Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 06:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Zwettepoel, (Frysk) Swettepoel. Path along the lake.
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine on Gaisrückenstrasse in Winklern, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Do you think it's straight? I think it's leaning right --Podzemnik 00:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Done @Podzemnik: The actual impression should be perpendicular now. —- Johann Jaritz 03:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Support I think the leaning problem was moot, as the plinth was vertical. It's obvious the structure is distorted in it's construction. Quality. --Acabashi 09:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New apartment building «Weisses Rössl» on Hauptstrasse #205, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Can you fix the right side of the building (it's not straight) + there is some white pixels are at the right bottom, needs cropping --Podzemnik 00:11, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Done @Podzemnik: The two issues should be fixed by now. I uploaded an edited version. —- Johann Jaritz 03:25, 17 April 2019 (UTC) @Johann Jaritz: Did you check the right bottom? The big white triangle is still there. --Podzemnik 04:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
No, it isn't. You forgot to press the actualize button. -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Support As the indentified problem has been fixed, with the picture being quality: support. Acabashi 12:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC) Hum you're right. I think the server had a delay, I couldn't see the new version even in a different browser or after refreshing my cache. I see it now, it's great :) --Podzemnik 21:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Self-explaining constructional drawing of the wikimedia logo. By User:Pumbaa80 --Piotr Bart 21:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too simple for me --Podzemnik 21:40, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Soccer ball. By User:Pumbaa80 --Piotr Bart 21:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Nice and effective shading technique --MB-one 14:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the lower valley at Zealandia EcoSanctuary, including Roto Kawau (lower reservoir) and the historic valve tower. By User:Psychokiwi --Aldnonymous 20:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:52, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment Geo-location would be very nice because I have got no idea in which country you have made this beautiful image --Michielverbeek 21:03, 16 April 2019 (UTC), it's in New Zealand. Seven Pandas 23:22, 16 April 2019 (UTC) -- I'd rather not using buggy geolocation now until tech did some fixing to it, and also it's in New zealand w:en:Zealandia (wildlife sanctuary). --Aldnonymous 03:13, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Ok, thanks --Michielverbeek 18:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Hague-NL, Een leven zonder boeken is onleefbaar (you cannot live without books) with Anna van Egmont (the first wife of William the Silent, Prince of Orange) near the central station --Michielverbeek 20:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:04, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination April 2019: SunExpress Boeing 737-800, taking off from Munich Airport runway 08R/26L.--Martin Falbisoner 15:03, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality though I would like it a bit brighter with more contrast -- Spurzem 20:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Fixed --Martin Falbisoner 09:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination ?. By User:Lokal Profil --Websteralive 06:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose I don't find it nice or appealing. Authorship is unclear --Podzemnik 21:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common Mynah, Nepali name- डाङ्ग्रे रुपी (Dangre Rupi) --Nirmal Dulal 05:45, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion This can't be considered for QI until you add the category for the common mynah, which is probably under the Latin name for the species. -- Ikan Kekek 07:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Done category added. Thanks Ikan Kekek for suggestion. -- Nirmal Dulal 09:19, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Good quality, especially on the claws. -- Ikan Kekek 06:20, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lighthouse of Estaca de Bares, in Mañón (province of A Coruña, Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 07:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
It's slightly tilted ccw and the image processor is visibly struggling to keep noise and CAs in check. --MB-one 09:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
A 1.75° CW gets it upright, but clips a little bit of the building at the left. --Acabashi 09:51, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Perspective correction necessary (see the verticals!) --Llez 03:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Not corrected within a week --Llez 09:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade made of shells of Bivalvia in Porto do Barqueiro, in Mañón (province of A Coruña, Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 07:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Would be a good picture without these CAs, please correct --Llez 07:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Not corrected within a week --Llez 09:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detached houses in Ribnitz-Damgarten --MB-one 07:27, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Needs perspective correction, is there a way to get the car full on the image? --Poco a poco 19:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
I'll see what I can do. Thanks for the review. --MB-one 09:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Done Fixed the perspective issues. --MB-one 08:32, 14 April 2019 (UTC).
Support The perspective problem was the only one mentioned, and none subsequently, so my support as a good image. Acabashi 18:52, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Agree --Poco a poco 19:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Goëngarijpsterpoelen (Frysk) Goaiïngarypster Puollen Trees in backlight on the polder dike of the Goëngarijpsterpoelen.
--Famberhorst 06:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC) - Withdrawn
The trees could benefit from dehazing --MB-one 09:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: Sorry for my late response. I had lost sight of the photo. What do you mean by dehazing? I can't find out via Translate.--Famberhorst 15:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
In Dutch Lightroom it's called "Nevel verweijderen". Does that help? --MB-one 08:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately it is not yet clear. The "Nevel" button not found. Or do you mean "Noise"?--Famberhorst 17:14, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
I believe it only became available in Lightroom 6. You can try "clarity" though. The effect should be similar. --MB-one 15:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
I am withdrawing the nomination. That button is also not present. It is also not my best photo. Thank you for your explanation!--Famberhorst 16:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Goëngarijpsterpoelen (Frysk) Goaiïngarypster Puollen Trees in backlight on the polder dike of the Goëngarijpsterpoelen.
Consensual review
[edit]File:Bavaria_Statue_and_Ruhmeshalle_Munich,_April_2019_-02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The Ruhmeshalle and the Bavaria Statue in Munich. --Martin Falbisoner 21:03, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:29, 15 April 2019
Oppose In places crass overexposed and foreground left too dark. I don't think that it is a QI. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 20:30, 16 April 2019 (UTC)(UTC)
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 21:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
*Ordinarily, I'd just post a comment, but since this has come to a vote: Oppose for now per Spurzem, but I think it's fixable and would like to support. I don't really care about the foreground, though, only about overexposed portions of the Ruhmeshalle. -- Ikan Kekek 08:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Info Thanks everyone! The thing is that the illumination is not really well calibrated, in fact it's way too bright. There's not much a photographer can do once the sky is getting really dark, as I've learned to my dismay... I've tried to further reduce highlights a bit but I'm afraid my raw doesn't offer more reserves. That being said, I think the image is better now --Martin Falbisoner 09:20, 17 April 2019 (UTC) - Support Seven Pandas 21:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Spurzem --Idontfindaoriginalname 22:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Eatcha 21:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 21:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Jubilee_and_Munin,_Ravens,_Tower_of_London_2016-04-30.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Jubilee and Munin, Ravens of the Tower of London By User:Colin--Eatcha 17:54, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Question@Eatcha I see you refurbishing the POTY-Winners. How many years are you willing to go back with nominating excellence for quality standard? --PtrQs 22:55, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think we should be blindsided by the fact that this was a featured picture (different criteria to QI anyway). There's so much wrong with it, including pixel smear, oversharpening causing white fringe artifacts, less than 2mb, main subject/s lacking focus, even the (what first appears sharp) beak on the left. The featured picture discussion (linked on the FP banner), has adequate comments admitting that this is below par quality. --Acabashi 15:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Acabashi, MB are irrelevant. The minimum size is 2 Megapixels. -- Ikan Kekek 15:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for that clarification. Acabashi 19:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I think this is a typical case where the FP criterion of wow factor superceding technical quality comes in. As for passing the criteria based purely on quality, I don't think it does.--Peulle 11:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner 21:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Peulle. --Yann 10:29, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle Poco a poco 17:44, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle --PtrQs 00:44, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment But I still cannot see the purpose of reviewing old POTY-winners. Wether they were praised for their technical quality or they had - as Peulle stated - so much wow, that technical errors could not stop people choosing them (or a sufficient mix of both). I think the real purpose of QI is to motivate us photographers to load new images of a contemporary quality into Commons, to provide us guidelines to judge them as 'Quality' and to give all those, who write articles, a database of high quality images to illustrate their text. So I see no good reason to re-review old images, wich have already earned their commendation, by (today's) QI-standards. --PtrQs 00:44, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Seven Pandas 21:19, 19 April 2019 (UTC)