Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 19 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Yosemite Valley in Yosemite National Park, California, USA --XRay 04:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 20-sided dice (icosahedron, D20) --XRay 04:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Opencast lignite mine “Garzweiler” as seen from the Jackerath viewpoint, Juchen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Angel relief in the Holy Cross chapel (Holy Cross Chapel) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia. Germany --XRay 04:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Benches in the Holy Cross chapel (Holy Cross Chapel) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia. Germany --XRay 04:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Langweerderwielen from the Zandvlakte in the early morning.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination View of Langweerderwielen from the Zandvlakte in the early morning.
-
- Nomination Schokkerhaven. View from the Havenweg over the Ketelmeer.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Schokkerhaven. View from the Havenweg over the Ketelmeer.
-
- Nomination Castle Hochosterwitz, on Hauptstrasse #120, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Hochosterwitz, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gerlitzen, seen from Baiersdorf in Sankt Veit an der Glan, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former Benedictine monastery on Schlossallee #6, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle ruin with vineyard in Taggenbrunn #11, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Mühlhausen (Thuringia) (1921). --Palauenc05 22:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palm warbler in Prospect Park, Brooklyn --Rhododendrites 21:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 21:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red-bellied woodpecker in Prospect Park, Brooklyn --Rhododendrites 21:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 21:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railway marter near Hallstadt Stöckigtwiesen --Ermell 21:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination HBM-Nobas Grader BG 110 T-4 --Ermell 21:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 21:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination HBM-Nobas Grader BG 110 T-4 --Ermell 21:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 21:37, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms in the portal of the Catholic monastery church Mariae Geburt in the monastery village in Scheinfeld --Ermell 21:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grade II listed pair of early 19th-C cottages on Little Crosby Road, Little Crosby. --Rodhullandemu 19:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Discostu 22:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building, Avenue de la République 1031, Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 17:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:24, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pont de L'Aqueduc --Wilfredor 17:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint-Charles Cemetery --Wilfredor 17:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:47, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Male rooster portrait (Gallus gallus domesticus), west of France --Clément Bardot 16:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Great quality on the head. -- Ikan Kekek 16:48, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rocks in the sea just after sunrise --Christian Ferrer 16:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very good ! --Sebring12Hrs 15:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination County road 3487T near the village of Jastków, Poland --Jakubhal 15:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:47, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Little Venice from the bridge on rue des Écoles in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 11:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. nice --Christian Ferrer 16:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge over the Tsna river near the Park of Culture and Rest. Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 10:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 16:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pyramidal orchid (Anacamptis pyramidalis) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:31, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good DOF and color. --Discostu 22:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rocks in the sea --Christian Ferrer 07:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality and very nice! --Tournasol7 06:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
You beat me to this. I was going to say, this is beautiful and consider picking your favorite photo of this motif to nominate at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 06:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC) thanks, there are still a few other photos to upload... --Christian Ferrer 11:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madonna and Child from the St. Laurence's Church in Těrlicko-Kostelec --Gampe 05:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madonna and Child from the St. Laurence's Church in Těrlicko-Kostelec --Gampe 05:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Markt 4 in Wittstock/Dosse, Brandenburg, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House of the Annunciation in Rodez, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:09, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old bridge in Belcastel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. nice --Christian Ferrer 07:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grand Hotel in Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France. --Tournasol7 05:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion High-quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows of the Saint Nicholas church in Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice framing, high resolution, good sharpness --Discostu 12:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hindeloopen. Tower on the Sylhús.
--Famberhorst 04:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hindeloopen. Tower on the Sylhús.
-
- Nomination Rue du Dr Blanchard in Uzes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Discostu 22:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Auf dem Altmarkt in Dresden --Nightflyer 20:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Discostu 22:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Das Sächsisches Staatsministerium der Finanzen in Dresden --Nightflyer 20:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Discostu 22:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Mary's Church, Little Crosby from Delph Lane, including its north side. -- Rodhullandemu 19:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Very nice. --Discostu 21:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stork nest in Podole, Opatów County, Poland --Jakubhal 17:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Maybe you could add a bit more sharpness. --Ermell 08:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Done Ok, new version uploaded. --Jakubhal 15:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross (1689) and wayside shrine in Mendig, Germany. --Palauenc05 08:47, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bark of Trachycarpus fortunei in the garden of the Musee d'Histoire naturelle in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Leaves of Pittosporum tobira 'Nana' in the garden of the Musee d'Histoire naturelle in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Portal of the building at 5-7 rue de Sauve in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 18:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Hôtel Rivet in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 18:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Hôtel de Chazel in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 18:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Grand Rue in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 18:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Graureiher am Bach--Horst J. Meuter 17:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Art Nouveau house, Rue Barthélémy Delespaul 112, Lille, France --Velvet 16:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: KAPS Insektenbekämpfung im Gäuwald bei Gommersheim, Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland.--Fischer.H 15:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Turisti al palazzo reale di Madrid --GattoCeliaco 13:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 4x4 Clever --M 93 13:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Wedding tub - par' - for storing clothes. Their collection of the Russian Ethnographic Museum. XIX - early XX centuries. --Erzianj jurnalist 11:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Syringa vulgaris in Spain. Detail of the flowers. --Balles2601 09:14, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sculptural composition "Boys playing football" --Reda Kerbouche 08:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sculptural composition "Boys playing football" --Reda Kerbouche 08:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sculptural composition "Boys playing football" --Reda Kerbouche 08:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sphere with the codes of the countries participating in the world cup in Russia --Reda Kerbouche 08:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Former Santa Chiara convent now University of Brescia. --Moroder 08:38, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Adventure Park in the city of Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 08:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Saint Francis church in Annecy, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Former Episcopal Palace of Annecy, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Tirthan River at Tirthan Valley, Himachal Pradesh, India --Debashritaiitmandi 06:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review Comment I think it's sharp enough, but please fix the COM:OVERCAT. -- Ikan Kekek 05:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cadran solaire à Genève en Suisse --Fawaz.tairou 22:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Please check the verticals. --Ermell 06:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Clipping highlights --Discostu 21:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building construction of a biogass plant in Legnano, Italy --Mænsard vokser 10:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Cranes are not sharp enough. Too shallow DOF and/or wrong focus point. --Discostu 21:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination High-rises in Givatayim. By User:Ynhockey --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
This one could do with a bit more sharpness. --Ermell 13:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Done —Ynhockey 13:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Cropping seems random to me, especially the beheaded building on the left --Discostu 21:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skybridge at HaArba'a Towers. By User:Ynhockey --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Nice geometry --Discostu 21:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anser cygnoides --Commonists 07:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Underexposed head, overexposed belly, blurred --Discostu 10:06, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ice formations on the shore in the Drammen fjord.--Peulle 13:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Seems to slightly lean clockwise. --Ximonic 19:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC) Done Perspective corrected. Thank you. --Peulle 09:07, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Nice foreground/background work --Discostu 21:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest in Ukraine by User:Sergnester --Anntinomy 10:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Overprocessed IMO. --F. Riedelio 06:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
I agree with User:F._Riedelio. Oversaturated, too much noise --Discostu 12:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination en:Place Bellecour from rue Zola --Touam 06:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Sorry, but I am missing something really sharp in this photo. I would have expected either the statue or the buildings to be very sharp, but they are not, nor are the trees in the foreground. What do other people think? --Aristeas 08:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I agree with User:Aristeas --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Food preparation for Indian wedding at village Fatehgarh Panjgraian, Sangrur, Punjab --Satdeep Gill 14:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
lack of Deep of field --Wilfredor 18:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with User:Wilfredor. Also I think the framing is too tight. --Discostu 21:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trabant 601 TRAMP at Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018 --MB-one 20:20, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
too noise in background, but it isn't reason to decline for me but not to promotion also, so neutral --Ezarate 11:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
The blue car is well focussed, but the two bikes immediately behind spoil the composition. --Tagooty 06:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose main object too dark, distracting bikes --Discostu 13:04, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building in the Area Cantoni in Legnano, Italy.--Mænsard vokser 09:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Please, check the verticals. --Tournasol7 10:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment I know that the pic looks a bit weird. I think that's because the ground is going downhill on the left but the building's left side is closer to the camera. If you check the roof in the middle is flat so I thought is was ok.--Mænsard vokser 18:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
The building is leaning in and the horizonthal line seems to be not straight too. --Tournasol7 06:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Ok, which line do you think I should use as vertical line? --Mænsard vokser 08:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
see notes, please. --Tournasol7 10:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Apart from the geometry problem there is also a distracting lamp post in the foreground -- Discostu 20:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waste collection point in Legnano (MI), Italy. --Mænsard vokser 13:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Perspective correction needed. --F. Riedelio 07:29, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
The tower crane is the vertical line I used (if I remember right). Which line do you think I should use as vertical line? --Mænsard vokser 08:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment This image is not just tilted, it needs correction of the perspective distortion. --F. Riedelio 09:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Done Gruss --Nightflyer 13:25, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A house in Fatehgarh Panjgraian at night --Satdeep Gill 04:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Blown-out highlights , perspective distortion. --F. Riedelio 08:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
@F. Riedelio: I have no idea how to fix that :) --Satdeep Gill 06:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
@Satdeep Gill: The perspective distortion can be corrected with an image editing program. --F. Riedelio 07:17, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
@F. Riedelio: How does it look now? --Satdeep Gill 07:33, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment @Satdeep Gill: It looks better, but IMO not good enough for QI (please see annotations). --F. Riedelio 11:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
@F. Riedelio: Thank you so much for the feedback. It's really helpful. --Satdeep Gill 15:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Declined as argued by User:F. Riedelio --Discostu 10:37, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Eilean_Donan_Castle_winter_scene.jpg
[edit]- Nomination By User:David Ross W --IamMM 09:22, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 14:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Too many artifacts, etc. Not a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 18:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan. Heavily overprocessed/oversharpened. Looks quite nice in preview, but catastrophic in full size view. --Smial 11:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Peulle 10:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. The sky shouldn't have sharp edges. 1/1000s w/ ISO400 is too fast to capture all the details. --Trougnouf 09:06, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The motive is really stunning but the artefacts in full size kill it for me. -- Discostu 12:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Anas_platyrhynchos_(Male)_in_Locarno_5.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Anas platyrhynchos (Male) --Commonists 07:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Focus not on the head. --A.Savin 21:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 21:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Palauenc05: What exactly is OK? The missing focus on the head? I actually thought, correct focus is essential for animal photographies. --A.Savin 12:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- OK means that IMO the head is sharp enough for QI. What about other opinions? --Palauenc05 14:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Palauenc05: What exactly is OK? The missing focus on the head? I actually thought, correct focus is essential for animal photographies. --A.Savin 12:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose not good enough for such an easy target. --Kallerna 16:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Would have preferred that this male mallard was looking towards camera, but acceptable for QI. --GRDN711 15:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support QI for me --Moroder 03:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --LexKurochkin 13:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Frozen_rosa_fruit_covered_with_snow_(Moscow_Oblast,_Russia)_on_2020_Dec_27_(9560).jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Frozen fruit of Rosa rugosa covered with snow --LexKurochkin 20:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Oppose Too unsharp. Smaller aperture could have solved the problem. --Ermell 07:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment I see your point, but there was different idea behind this photo. I wanted to have minimal possible DoF to focus viewer's attention on the fruit and snow. The second idea was to get nice bokeh of the pine needles behind the fruit. Closing aperture would not improve sharpness of the fruit and snow on it (it is already sharp with pixel size details, the image is not reduced, it is a crop of central part), but would make the image very different. As it is a bush with lots of twigs, behind these two twigs would be visible other ones, and the background would be blurred very differently. Let's discuss it. And thank you for the review. --LexKurochkin 20:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC) - Question LexKurochkin, I accept your argument, but then why didn't you crop out more of the background? -- Ikan Kekek 06:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I'll try. --LexKurochkin 20:27, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Let me know when you do, and I'll take another look. -- Ikan Kekek 21:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- new version Ikan Kekek, please take a look at the new version. --LexKurochkin 15:11, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Thanks, very good. -- Ikan Kekek 16:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Ikan Kekek Thank you for the hint. --LexKurochkin 20:13, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose underexposed, small, bad crop. --Kallerna 16:46, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Question How is this a bad crop? -- Ikan Kekek 05:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Image is mostly OOF background. --Kallerna 09:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Question You're definitely looking at the current version? How much more would you expect him to crop? -- Ikan Kekek 05:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan --Commonists 20:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 16:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)