Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 18 2020

• 
  • Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand/Hulshorsterheide. The Hierdensche Beek basin.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walk through the Hollandse Hout Water feature in the nature reserve.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing posture moisture sucking of Parantica aglea (Stoll, (1782)) – Glassy Tiger (Male) --Rahulbiswas29 04:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blossom of cherry trees in Schulstrasse, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Painted stone on Mauritiusstrasse in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brother Klaus Chapel in the Baumberge, Havixbeck, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the Saint Viktor Church, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing basking of Heliophorus epicles (Godart, (1824)) – Purple Sapphire --Rahulbiswas29 03:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Newly emerged specimens of Eurema andersonii (Moore, 1886) – One-spot Grass Yellow --Rahulbiswas29 03:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cannon in the Klis Fortress, Croatia --Bgag 03:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cannon in the Klis Fortress, Croatia --Bgag 03:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Klis Fortress, Croatia --Bgag 03:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Vid Church in the Klis Fortress, Croatia --Bgag 03:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Vid Church in the Klis Fortress, Croatia --Bgag 03:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Villa Sole on Anna Street #25, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northwestern view of the Parkhotel on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 03:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lanterns on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Werzer`s boathouse on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hotel Astoria on Annastraße #43, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charleroi (Belgique) - Rue de Montigny 114. Maison en briques colorées avec décors émaillés. --Jmh2o 22:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charleroi (Belgique) - Rue de Montigny 114. Maison en briques colorées avec décors émaillés. --Jmh2o 22:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charleroi (Belgique) - Rue de Montigny 114. Maison en briques colorées avec décors émaillés. --Jmh2o 22:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street sign of Avenue de Joinville in Nogent-sur-Marne, Val-de-Marne, France. --Chabe01 19:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination World War II memorial in Centre Cemetery of Gagny in Seine-Saint-Denis, France. --Chabe01 19:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stele on which is written "Sépulture Militaire 1870-1871" on the place commemorating Franco-Prussian War in Bry-sur-Marne cemetery, France. --Chabe01 19:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gyoza durant le confinement 2020. --Benoît Prieur 19:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 21:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of a cat in park Theresienstein. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 14:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A memorial of Hofer artists. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:59, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support - I don't love the background, but there's no doubt in my mind that this is a very good picture of the memorial and a solid QI. -- Ikan Kekek 02:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing Basking posture of Zizeeria karsandra (Moore, 1865) – Dark Grass Blue (Male) --Rahulbiswas29 13:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 14:16, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing nectaring of Ixias pyrene (Linnaeus, 1764) – Yellow Orange-tip (Female) --Rahulbiswas29 13:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 22:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing nectaring of Ixias pyrene (Linnaeus, 1764) – Yellow Orange-tip (Female) --Rahulbiswas29 13:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 22:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A 🐈 statue in park Theresienstein. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ich habe den Eindruck, das Bild sei ein bisschen überschärft. -- Spurzem 14:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
     Done Danke für den Hinweis, weichgezeichnet --PantheraLeo1359531 14:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
    Jetzt ist es ein schönes Bild; gefällt mir. -- Spurzem 16:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pulpit of the parish church of Sankt Potentinus in Wehr, early 18th century -- Spurzem 11:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 21:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief of Saint Mark at the pulpit of the parish church in Wehr Spurzem 11:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 21:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief of Saint John the Evangelist at the pulpit of the parish church in Wehr -- Spurzem 11:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion A horizontal perspective correction needed --PantheraLeo1359531 12:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
     Done Du hast recht; danke. -- Spurzem 14:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
    Prima, danke --PantheraLeo1359531 14:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief of Saint Luke the Evangelist at the pulpit of the parish church in Wehr -- Spurzem 11:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief of Saint Matthew at the pulpit of the parish church in Wehr Spurzem 11:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 21:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alabaster coast at Roc Vaudieu, Normandy, France --Milseburg 11:40, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 11:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle Hohenwerfen, Werfen, Austria --Poco a poco 09:49, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but unfavorable view and disturbing information sign in the foreground -- Spurzem 11:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Allium 'Mount Everest', Riedergarten, Rosenheim, Germany --Poco a poco 09:49, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose - Please feel free to contest, but to me, neither the flower nor the bee is sharp, and some petals toward the far side of the flower seem haloed. -- Ikan Kekek 11:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Friedrichsort lighthouse, Kiel, Germany --Poco a poco 09:49, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kamøyvær lighthouse, Norway --Poco a poco 09:49, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Sonya7iv 11:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jablanica mountain in winter 2020, in right side is highest peak Black Stone, and in left side Chumin peak --Liridon 09:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carschten 09:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the battle of Saint Ulrich of Augsburg . Fresco by Franz Xaver Kirchebner . --Moroder 09:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carschten 09:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Plaza of Our Lady of the Pillar (Zaragoza)in 2016 --GattoCeliaco 08:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose In this form. Extremely low file size, compression artifacts especially in darker areas --PantheraLeo1359531 14:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of an Embraer Lineage 1000 at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland --MB-one 07:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ICE-T coming to a stop at platform 1 in Ribnitz-Damgarten Ost --MB-one 07:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 08:16, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hyundai Santa Fe at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 07:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 16:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Museum in St. Gallen --MB-one 07:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kleve-NRW, statue on a horse (Friedrich Wilhelm) in the street --Michielverbeek 06:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Goch-NRW, street view Klever Strasse with met monumental watertower --Michielverbeek 06:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hommersum, the catholic Pfarrkirche Sankt Petrus with the vicarage --Michielverbeek 06:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock labyrinth at the Lichtenstein castle ruin --Ermell 06:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock labyrinth at the Lichtenstein castle ruin --Ermell 06:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment nice use of DoF, but once again there is blue CA in the trees --Carschten 09:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remains of the wall of the northern castle Lichtenstein --Ermell 06:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lichtenstein Castle (South Castle) --Ermell 06:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock labyrinth at the Lichtenstein castle ruin --Ermell 06:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. @Ermell: But: Please remove the CAs at the branches. --XRay 06:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained-glass window in the Saint Genevieve church in Sainte-Geneviève-sur-Argence, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grand Rue in Mur-de-Barrez, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church in Saint-Rémy-de-Montpeyroux, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower of Vinca major subsp. Hirsuta. Beautiful evergreen ground cover with narrow petals. You see this species much less than the general Vinca major.
    --Famberhorst 05:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hitachi ZAXIS 140W excavator with supplies. Hitachi ZAXIS 140W> Detail.
    --Famberhorst 05:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination One of the doors of the "ArT of opEN doors" project, Travessa do Pimenta 1 C, Funchal --Llez 05:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination One of the doors of the "ArT of opEN doors" project, Travessa do Pimenta 1 B, Funchal --Llez 05:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination One of the doors of the "ArT of opEN doors" project, Travessa do Pimenta 1 A, Funchal --Llez 05:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:17, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination One of the doors of the "ArT of opEN doors" project, Travessa do Pimenta 1, Funchal --Llez 05:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Thai freshwater snail, Brotia dautzenbergiana --Llez 05:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Horse fur & mane hair texture. --Kallerna 05:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graffiti on a wind power station in Reposaari, Finland. --Kallerna 05:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Railways near the railway station of Rauma, seen from the railway bridge. --Kallerna 05:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dairy farm Aldewei Boornzwaag municipality De Fryske Marren province Friesland.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand/Hulshorsterheide. Wooden sculpture at viewpoint.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:16, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lucerne: Reuss River with Needle Dam, Museums, Hotel Château Gütsch and "Spreuerbrücke" --JoachimKohler-HB 20:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment many dust spots in the sky --Carschten 20:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
    Dust spots removed. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Carschten 09:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Another street in Hof Krötenbruck. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:17, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Washed colours. --Kallerna 05:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A street in Hof Krötenbruck. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Mobile phone snapshot, dark shadows. --Kallerna 05:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marienlyst stadium seen from the north.--Peulle 11:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
    Clear tilt and looks like a copy of the next image with more contrast --Poco a poco 13:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC) Done Tilt fixed, thanks. :) It's a similar image but with different zoom levels, trying to include more of the buildings around the stadium.--Peulle 08:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Partially dismantled pier in Eckernförde --MB-one 11:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Possible FP for a great composition. Is it tilted CW a bit? Both the left and right vertical posts are leaning right, but since we can't see the horizon I'm not sure if that is the result of a tilt or if the bridge is actually leaning that way.--Peulle 12:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
    @Peulle: Thank you for the kind review. The answer is probably both. I assumed the far poles and plank to be perfectly leveled, but after careful inspection, that doesn't seem to be the case. Uploaded a new version. --MB-one 11:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC) I guess only a real-life inspection will give an answer. Nothing on this pier is straight. xD --Peulle 18:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hồng Lãnh Bridge in Hội An, Vietnam. --Carschten 10:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 05:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alpaca in the Börnste hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. The alpaca looks like it's got antlers :) --Podzemnik 04:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
    yes, hence not a great composition. Charlesjsharp 08:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A bus that put on a 87th Anniversary bus advertisement. --Streetdeck 15:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. But I would like to read more about the model of this bus. -- Spurzem 20:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Credit River at Forks of the Credit Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 00:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Traditional Batak tailors making ulos. --Rachmat04 03:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please check the perspective, verticals should be vertical. And why 1/13 s? A shorter time may be better, f/13 or f/11 may be enough (a the image may be sharper). --XRay 03:38, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Flowering Ligularia dentata ‘Desdemona’. --Bff 22:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The thread of a chasen (used for the japanese tea ceremony) that separate it's parts --D-Kuru 22:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Clock of the Tower of the Municipality of Pienza (Siena) formerly Palazzo dei Priori.--PROPOLI87 20:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Fenestron of an Airbus H135 of the Federal Police of Germany at AERO Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 17:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tower of David. By User:Erezvanso --Andrew J.Kurbiko 15:57, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hula Valley. By User:Erezvanso --Andrew J.Kurbiko 15:57, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View of Jaffa. By User:Idomeir --Andrew J.Kurbiko 15:57, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A silent scenery at lake Untreu. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:59, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: An empty track at lake Untreu. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:51, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Portugal, Lisbon, Building at Avenida Sidónio Pais --Berthold Werner 13:14, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cascade de la Roque in commune of Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:23, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Open wing position of Byasa polyeuctes Doubleday, 1842 – Common Windmill (by Sourabh.biswas003) --Atudu 06:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A locked playground in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Very sharp, but can you pull the shadows a bit. The contrast is too high atm. --MB-one 11:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the rev, tweaks added --PantheraLeo1359531 14:43, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
     Support Much better --MB-one 15:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moss and lichen growing on a outcrop in Hummatus, Rauma. --Kallerna 08:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Seems to me, like the foreground is oversharpened --MB-one 11:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Background is out of focus. --King of Hearts 04:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drammen hospital seen from the north.--Peulle 07:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Too dark perhaps? Any specific significance of this particular hospital (building)? --Rahul Bott 07:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)  Info Well, I guess since the sun was going down at the time, the lighting does seem a bit special. As for special significance, not really except that a new hospital will be built for 2025 and this one will be phased out or demolished. Feel free to oppose if you don't think it's good enough.--Peulle 20:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
     Weak oppose Without realizing that File:Drammen sykehus sett fra Hamborgstrømskogen mars 2020 (2).jpg is already a QI, I did feel it was slightly better than this one! Thanks for the additional info about the building and sorry. --Rahul Bott 12:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Sea_stacks_-_Hopewell_Rocks.jpg

• Nomination Sea stacks, Hopewell Rocks, New Brunswick, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 03:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. Too dark, blurry --Podzemnik 03:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Podzemnik. Unfavorable conditions. --Milseburg 06:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others, though the motif is certainly striking and impressive in itself. -- Ikan Kekek 11:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 14:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Wandeling_over_het_Hulshorsterzand-Hulshorsterheide_07-03-2020._(actm.)_51.jpg

• Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand/Hulshorsterheide. View over Hulshorsterzand/Hulshorsterheide.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
• WB off, description? --Kallerna 08:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful image and good quality -- Spurzem 11:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 12:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed. The dramatization of the sky by darkening it, leads to relatively strong noise and unnatural halos at the two solitary trees on the left and right, which rise into the sky. But in contrast to the picture below, the white balance here is ok for me. --Smial 13:59, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Done. Noise reduction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - Good quality. Maybe the nimbus clouds are a bit blue, but I wasn't there and won't second-guess that. -- Ikan Kekek 00:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 14:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Wandeling_over_het_Hulshorsterzand-Hulshorsterheide_07-03-2020._(actm.)_38.jpg

• Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand/Hulshorsterheide. Solitaire Fagus sylvatica in the drifting sand area.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose WB off, description? --Kallerna 08:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment - I fixed the description, unless you aren't willing to tolerate "Walk across the Hulshorsterzand/Hulshorsterheide." All the photos that Agnes and Dominicus take during their hikes are labeled "Walk [somewhere]" and then the specific thing we're looking at. What's the problem with the white balance? Do you perhaps think the ground is too yellow? Because otherwise, it's a good photo and I would normally vote for it. -- Ikan Kekek 12:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Why would the description start with something like that? It's definitely not an explanation of what the file represents. The photo is too yellow. --Kallerna 09:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. I need no explanation to see what photo shows. The color obviously is due to the position of the sun. -- Spurzem 11:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment So should we just upload photos without descriptions? Please check your monitor if you think colour balance is right. --Kallerna 15:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose WB off. Not an early morning or late evening shot, and also no desert dust in the air, that would lead to such yellowish WB. --Smial 13:51, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Done. WB. correction Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Looks much more natural now. --Smial 23:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - The previous version was more vivid, but if this is the one people prefer, OK. -- Ikan Kekek 00:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 14:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Cecil_Kings_Hut,_Wangapeka_Track,_Kahurangi,_New_Zealand_03.jpg

• Nomination Cecil Kings Hut, Wangapeka Track, Kahurangi --Podzemnik 00:06, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --XRay 02:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  Do we really need four so similar QIs? Criteria:"Carefully select your best images to nominate". --Kallerna 08:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. Whether we need such images of course is another question. -- Spurzem 11:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, and I can actually imagine usages of this photo. --Aristeas 09:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - Very good. Once upon a time, there was a cabin in a forest clearing... :-) -- Ikan Kekek 11:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 19:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

File:War_cemetery_for_World_war_II_on_the_cemetery_Matzleinsdorf_in_Vienna,_Austria-grave_stone-group_right_PNr°0629.jpg

• Nomination war cemetry in Matzleinsdorf Vienna, Austria --D-Kuru 22:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Oppose Some gravestones are out of focus --Podzemnik 02:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
  

•  CommentThe purpose never was to have all of them completly in focus. I used an apature of 4 to create a little bit more DOF than 2.8, but just not all of them --D-Kuru 06:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose - If the one in front were in focus and the others were somewhat blurred, I'd be fine with that, but the one that seems most nearly in focus is the one with the word "FAMILIEN" above the hedges. I'm having trouble understanding the compositional point in having that level of background be the focal point. -- Ikan Kekek 06:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment The text on the gravestone in the very back is in focus. So first gravestone in focus, every other is blurred = OK; last grave stone in focus, every other is blurred =  Not OK. Sorry, but this doesn't sound very consistent.

Add compositional point: Point is to give shift some of the attention to the back row, to give a feeling of depth and a visual feeling for the space aquired by the objects. After all, this is a war cemetery for 341 fallen russian soldiers of the second world war. The idea was to not look at the image and see a big gravestone in the front and many gravestones follow, but to look at the image and see that much space is already taken by gravestones/dead soldiers before you even get to the last row.

--D-Kuru 11:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

OK, you've given a clear compositional rationale for your decision. I've crossed out my opposing vote. One can't tell from this photo, though, that there are anything like 341 Russian soldiers buried there. But that's a bit beside the point. -- Ikan Kekek 12:53, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, it's hard to give a good full picture of the site. I also did not want to step on other graves or climb gravestones just to get a good shot. A drone would clearly help here. To improve the description I have added the corresponding item on wikidata where this information is stored. I'll also provide a little more detailed descriptions in the future. --D-Kuru 21:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - I still find that this style of selective focus produces a strange effect on me, but I take the point that it's a legitimate compositional idea and I'd rather that this nomination not be decided by a single vote, so I'm supporting it to tie the vote and allow others to determine the fate of the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 00:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Whatever the rationale for the focus, the blurry result is not QI. Charlesjsharp 08:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 14:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

File:View_towards_Mt_Patriarch,_Wangapeka_Track,_Kahurangi,_New_Zealand_04.jpg

• Nomination View towards Mt Patriarch, Wangapeka Track --Podzemnik 00:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:23, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
   Oppose over exposed, washed out. Seven Pandas 16:44, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - Fairly bright sunlight, but very good and a solid QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 14:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed. --Kallerna 08:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. A tiny little bit overexposed, but very usable and overall good. --Aristeas 10:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I hope it's better now. --Podzemnik 09:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support It's better now ;-) --Smial 11:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 14:12, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

File:A320 HB-JXR (2014) - Aile (1).jpg

• Nomination: Wing of an A320 in flight. --Gzen92 12:28, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
• Review
   Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
   Oppose Please address the issues from previous nomination first. Also check the tilt --Podzemnik 00:44, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
   Done Sorry, noise reduction performed on the three photos. Gzen92 12:49, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Seven Pandas 23:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Over 50 % of the photo is of empty sky, not the wing. --Kallerna 08:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
   Done It's true. Gzen92 12:54, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 07:55, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Rosa_'Grande_Amore',_Bad_Wörishofen,_Alemania,_2019-06-20,_DD_21.jpg

• Nomination: 'Grande Amore' Rose, Bad Wörishofen, Germany --Poco a poco 15:37, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
• Review
•  Comment A bit too dark IMO. --Tournasol7 17:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Done --Poco a poco 18:45, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - Severe posterization in this version has destroyed the 3-dimensionality of the photo. The previous version was also seriously posterized, though not as badly. I would decline this image if the problem can't be fixed. -- Ikan Kekek 07:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

• I've uploaded another version retouching the curves, but I cannot see any signs of posterization on my monitor --Poco a poco 12:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose - It sure looks flattened to me. I'm going to decline. Feel free to have a discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 05:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

• Fair enough, ok, let's discuss, please --Poco a poco 09:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Intense red is always a problem for digital cameras and a challenge even in the times of photography on slide film. The original image version may appear a little dark, but of all three current versions, it has the best reproduction of the red tones. --Smial 09:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose flat, unsharp, lack of details Seven Pandas 21:51, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I prefer the first version. --Pandakekok9 13:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Info Ok, I went back to the first version --Poco a poco 07:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment - The innermost petals are good in this version, but the outer petals bug me and still look posterized to me, with regions of one shade of red that has no real texture or differentiation and darker regions that have texture. Basically, the middle-tone reds are posterized through most of the flower. -- Ikan Kekek 09:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support now. Acceptable, because it is really hard to catch those colours. --Smial 11:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support It's a bit dark indeed, but this is acceptable enough for QI. The brightened versions ruined the photo. --Pandakekok9 02:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support good for me now. --Aristeas 08:48, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
•  OpposeNo detail Charlesjsharp 20:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 07:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)