Commons:Picture of the Year/2006/Voting phase 2/archive 6

Vote - Vota - Voto - 投票 - Oy

فارسی: لطفاً رأی خود را به انتهای این لیست اضافه کنید.

العربية: من فضلك أضف تصويتاتك الجديدة عند نهاية القائمة التالية.

Català: Si us plau, afegiu el vostre vot a la fi de la llista següent.

Čeština: Prosíme, přidejte své hlasy na konec seznamu.

Dansk: Stem venligst ved at tilføje din stemme nederst på den følgende liste.

Deutsch: Bitte neue Stimmen in der folgenden Liste unten anfügen.

English: Please add your new votes to the end of the following list.

Español: Por favor, inserta tu voto al final de la siguiente lista.

Français : Veuillez ajouter vos nouveaux votes à la fin de la liste suivante.

Galego: Por favor insira os seus votos no fin da lista.

Magyar: Kérünk, szavazatod a lista végén add le.

Bahasa Indonesia: Silahkan tambahkan pilihan baru anda pada bagian akhir dari daftar berikut.

Italiano: Aggiungi il tuo voto alla fine della seguente lista.

日本語: 投票する場合は次のリストの一番最後に追加して下さい。

Nederlands: Voegt u alstublieft stemmen aan het eind van de volgende lijst toe.

Polski: Proszę dodawać nowe głosy na końcu tej strony.

Português: Por favor insira os seus votos no fim da lista.

Română: Vă rugăm să vă adaugaţi voturile la sfârşitul listei de dedesubt.

Русский: Чтобы проголосовать, пожалуйста, добавьте ваш голос в конец списка.

Shqip: Ju lutem shtoni votat tuaja në fund të listës së mëposhtëme.

Српски / srpski: Молимо додајте свој глас на крај списка гласова.

Slovenčina: Prosím, pridajte svoj hlas na koniec zoznamu.

Slovenščina: Prosimo, dodajte svoj glas na konec spodnjega seznama.

Suomi: Lisääthän äänesi seuraavan listan perään.

Svenska: Var god och skriv dina nya röster i slutet av följande lista.

Tagalog: Pakilagay ang inyong boto sa dulo ng sumusunod na listahan.

Türkçe: Lütfen oylarınızı aşağıdaki listenin sonuna ekleyiniz.

中文（中国大陆）：请将您的投票加在投票名单的末尾。

中文（臺灣）：請將您的投票加在投票名單的末尾。

---

• a - example vote by Commons user - MichaelMaggs 22:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
• z - example vote by user without a Commons Userid - diff 85.139.196.32 23:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

---

See this guide for a step by step guide on diff making.

---

Archives

• 17 - 18 February
• 18 - 19 February
• 19 - 21 February
• 21 - 23 February
• 23 - 27 February

Votes (add to the BOTTOM)

• 6 - Apocalypse now... Great shot, strongly evocative! El ComandanteHasta ∞ 03:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• 4 - Great astronomy animation, congratulations! Besides, self-made, not taken from another website, like e.g. number 5. Cmapm 14:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10 - Cap-in-hand artist diff Nepomuk 15:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 6 - just perfect. SalomonCeb 15:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Less than 100 edits - Alvesgaspar 15:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 8 - Amazing!--82.201.178.229 15:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)No anon voting please --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC))
• 2 Pour l'amour de l'humanité... --Jod-let 15:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 - one of the few pictures that has the right to win - Jeroenvrp 15:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 8. A magnificient animal in a natural kinglike position. You can even see the (invisible) foreground mirrored in its eyes. My compliments to the photographer! diff Sijo Ripa 15:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10. I envy Fir for taking such incredible pictures - this is art! PER9000 16:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 1. The SFO by night has been my wallpaper for months. Excellent picture. (diff for 7000+ edits) Wim van Dorst 16:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC).
• 6. Great photo It's a winner! diff Springnuts 16:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff - Alvesgaspar 18:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5. Difficult choice diff --74.38.90.174 17:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5. Excellent 86.148.134.123 17:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)No anon voting please --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC))
• 9. Beautiful diff 84.68.226.123 18:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 8 Excellent --NicolasGrandjean 17:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 Stunning diff 67.85.35.9 18:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff link, please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 19:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 6 - Sacud [talk]► 18:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 Stunning. Corrected diff. 67.85.35.9 19:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10 Spectacular photo. --Rbraunwa 19:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 --[diff] Tempest115 19:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Sorry, less than 100 edits in both wikis together - Alvesgaspar 20:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10 Visually stunning. Fredhsu 19:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10 - lightning in a bottle. diff. Lpangelrob 20:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 4 I like that it teaches you and is pretty too! diff WilliamKF 20:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 WOW, absolutly breathtaking. diff Ferdiaob 20:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 6 Really nice detail and color. diff Patrickneil 21:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 11 - wow, i forgot to zoom in on this before. the detail is unbelievable! JoeSmack 21:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Less than 100 edits in Commons, sorry! - Alvesgaspar 22:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 1 - Surreal... me like. - Arch_NME 22:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Please insert a diff link, according to instructions - Alvesgaspar 22:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10 - Difficult choice, but I go for this one (very original). --JLCA 22:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2 - Amazing detail. diff -- Reaper X 22:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 7 - Very hard to make up one's mind, but I like the natural theme of this one. diff --Yvesnimmo 22:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2 - So hard to choose, but this one is absolutely great. Retouching is close to perfect. diff 131.111.8.99 23:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff, please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 23:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2 I like great colors, but the subject matter of this one has my vote. GChriss 23:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC) (My identity diff: [1])
• 2 - Corrected diff, here is the new one: diff 131.111.8.99 23:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 1 - diff "Lafayette Iraq War Memorial" You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10 Excellent. diff Kellen 23:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2 diff Difficult choice, but I like this one. KeepOnTruckin 23:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 4 here is a diff because i have fewer (not less) than 100 edits. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 Love it, very deserving. diff Mullibok 00:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 3 I am a big fan of animation, and this is something very special. This is the diff you require. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat) 01:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 great picture. diff MichaelWheeley 01:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 1 diff PaladinWhite 01:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 diff -Ike9898 02:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 Definitely caught my attention. Loved it. diff Century0 02:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 Very beautiful picture of the Northern Lights (I wish it was this visible in MN) diff :: ZJH ^{(T C E)} 02:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10. I can well believe that it took Fir0002 three days to capture that image. - BanyanTree 03:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10. Brilliant image; tack-sharp focus and beautiful colors. Drama!Birdbrainscan 03:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC) Does not meet sufferage requirements. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 Messedrocker 04:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 8 An amazing high resolution picture of an rarely seen owl. diff Alan.ca 04:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2 Brilliant. diff JohnnoShadbolt 05:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 4 Love it - just love it. It's a ball--Smkolins 05:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 Absolutely beautiful, looks like a National Geographic best quality image. Canticle You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 A hard choice, congratulations to all photographers. diff Ashibaka 05:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 I've been on that very road, and for some reason it always produces the best lights. diff -206.174.71.231
• 4 I used this along with #3 in my intro physics course. Very instructive image series. --Skoch3 06:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 6 diff. Wonderful narrative image. --195.166.150.161 06:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2 because it's probably the best scene. gren 07:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 3 diff JPG-GR 07:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10 Beautiful... Paris75000 09:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC) I've got about 7.000 edits on Wiki.fr and diff
• 10 Capturing it, the composition, the detai. Great shot. ---Bigbean No unsigned voting please --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC))
• 4 Just great. --Gloumouth1 10:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 1 Awesome picture. 5 is also pretty good. diff Chris01720 11:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC) <100 edits -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 But it was a tough choice! diff --Grant M 13:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2 Simply stunning. --62.25.109.195 13:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC) No anon voting please --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC))
• 8 Basik07 14:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 WoW just WoW if you look up close in that picture you see two tiny UFOs LAWL in the sky. Very emotional/moody shot... very champagne-ish. San Diego represent!Getonyourfeet 14:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 11 I just like that one :-) (diff) --80.62.90.39 14:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 6 --Eleassar ^(t/p) 15:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 11 /Lokal_Profil 15:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC) Mmmm.. fire... And great resoulution to
• 4, All good pictures, but this is my fav.Clerks]] 16:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2 It took guts to compose this so carefully. Brutally beautiful. Kafziel 16:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC) [2]
• 7 - Love that picture! -- High Contrast 16:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 8 Very striking (though 6 came close, and I love 3 too!) diff Quackdave 16:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 7 See a glimpse of the world reflected in the eye and ask yourself how this bird experiences the snowy branch. (Perhaps for next year Wikimedia could offer a custom web form for voting.) SvGeloven 17:56, 26 February 2007 (CET) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2 Great picture --Jodo 17:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC) (Diff on German Wikipedia)
• 2 Birds and different views all are verry nice, but pic 2 tells not only about the depicted person, but also about the condition of a western society. It needs courage and knowledge al well making such a portrait.--Decius 17:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 6 --Dani 7C3 (talk) 17:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 6 --89.102.143.110 17:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)No anon voting please --Herby ^{talk thyme} 20:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC))
• 4 All are beautiful, but I feel that this one really imparts knowledge all by itself. 199.64.0.252 17:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)No anon voting please --Herby ^{talk thyme} 20:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC))
• 2 This isn't the most beautiful picture, but it is the most important. —Psychonaut 18:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 --Göran Smith 18:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC) ( diff ) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 6 So many good pics to have to decide from! --evrik 19:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 11 A striking image(hehe). Difficult to take, technically excellent, informative and interesting. HighInBC 20:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)diff
• 9 It is a beautiful nature shot. Watersoftheoasis 20:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby ^{talk thyme} 20:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 -- You made 1 pale in comparison. diff -- Kerowren 20:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 8: Beautiful picture. —Celestianpower ^háblame 20:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5. 81.77.219.210 20:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC). Sorry forgot to log-in first - Legis 20:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 3--Warburg 21:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 7 My favorite since i've seen it first time. --GeorgHH 21:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10 probably the most difficult to shoot and it has excellent quality. --Dschwen 21:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 8 Incredible shot. My wallpaper for a while. (diff) --64.93.150.122 21:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2 The most technic and artistic one. Remi Mathis 21:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 Absolutely stunning 220.233.89.72 21:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10 I was sure I had voted here already... Anyways, hurrah for Fir! diff AndonicO 21:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 Nice. 71.252.19.214 22:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 Same as above, just forgot to diff. diff You know they should make these things easier. There's a wonderful innovation called a radio button!
• 6. Great photo diff Springnuts 16:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• 11. wonderful detail, i love it 24.125.208.164 23:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9. Extremely atmospheric photograph. diff DWaterson 23:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 - Love it, NoSeptember 23:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC) diff
• 7 - Beautiful colours make great contrast with snow 192.246.231.98 00:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC) diff
• 5 - Stunning. -BjorneOfDanmark 00:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC) diff
• 10 - All are great; this one fulfills every criterion I can think of, both in terms of technique (perfect lighting, composition, shutter, sharpness, while capturing a flitting subject) and expression (semantics, mood, style). Halfway between still-life and action picture, it achieves an exquisite blend of tension and repose. It is both a superb scientific illustration, a powerful metaphor for the cycles of life and a cultural statement, and thus extremely rich in information and meaning. Francisco de Almeida, 01:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Nonexistant user. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• 1 I think this one has the highest quality in terms of its improvement to an encyclopedia. All are good selections. Cacophony 02:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• 7: Just a guess. (diff) --Slgrandson 03:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 1 awesome diff 68.95.225.184 03:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 1 - They are all great. 124.197.47.23 05:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC) I voted again while logged in below
• 1 - They are all great. (_Donovan You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. Geocachernemesis
• 7. Finest Image of the lot. Photographer has quite a portfolio of excellent quallity images. Most all of the other images are "be at the right place at the right time" images, or "take enough pictures till you get it" images, whereas his are works of art. On a side note, the "newton's cradle" animation is well done., except the motions of the balls are unrealistically calculated. There is a certain timing and formula they should follow, and, having used these a tone of times, this is not quite it. Also, the "homeless man" would have been my vote, but the "photoshopping" effects mar the uncut beauty(figurative, not literal) of any image.The level of detail in 7 is unmatched, not even by 8...I've never seen a wildlife picture so clear...diff--Vox Rationis 05:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• 11 - It was hard to decide. 3, and 4, were way cool, but didn't quite have the quality that 11 has. 3 had weird animation frames, w:en:Uncanney Valley? The Libration one was way cool, but the quality was lacking in that the moon didn't stay in one position. 11 was a high quality image, that looks awesome. Mckaysalisbury 06:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC) (certification diff)
• 5 This really is the best diff --24.164.94.90 06:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 Its really nice picture. Nature at its best. 203.199.242.193 07:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 6 Awesome. --24.25.242.51 07:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2 It's stark beauty, and inherent poetical nature make it stand out among the other works. The muted colors add to the overall effect producing an image of instant emotional and critical response. diff Zidel333 07:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• 2. Incredible. diff. AmiDaniel 08:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 Pure nature. diff -GlamdringCookies 11:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• 11 - it's really hard, they're all so wonderfull, but 11 has something surrealism I like. -- Ra'ike Diskussion 11:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 11 - Detailed and very difficult to take. Also something we can't usually see as its too fast and bright. Ksbrown^talk 11:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• 9 Really like this one. diff --Romanski 11:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10 217.45.192.99 11:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 Natural and colorful sight - not to forget "rare". - Qasamaan You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 8 diff - Great photo. --MichaelBillington 12:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• 4 Explanatory power is worth 10,000 words . -- Lumos3 13:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 5 Amazing picture. It really lights up the sky for me. Calgacus 13:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 6 wow! --146.191.228.11 15:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• 10 – Tintazul ^talk 15:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)