Commons:Picture of the Year/2006/Voting phase 1/archive 3

174, 187, 203, 205, 250 - Jwanders 00:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]
91, 169, 187, 205, 250 - Jwanders 00:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]
137, 161, 206, 257, 303 - wau 00:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
14, 99, 254, 267, 315 - in no particular order. Terence Ong 04:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
170, 187, 60, 57 - ...although all are excellent pictures - diff +A.Ou 05:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
254, 50, 58, 209, 173 - diff Miguel Andrade 05:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
42, 67, 69, 286, 308 - Jnpet 07:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
310, 291, 44, 138, 38 - ajvol 10:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
99, 249, 254, 265, 303 - Interesting motif, nice colors, skilled technique. - Johnny 10:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
30, 23, 82, 317, 69 - Siebrand 10:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
153, 146, 254, 245, 66 - SehLax 11:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
258, 83, 225, 28, 284 - ♦ Pabix ^ℹ 12:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
43, 128, 168, 2144, 214, 276. I've enjoyed having this revision of fhe 2006 vintage --Javierme 12:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC) please use the format explained to change your vote so that it looks like below. You'll help the counting bot: Verdy p 00:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
43, 128, 168, 214, 276 - I've enjoyed having this revision of fhe 2006 vintage --Javierme 12:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC) new vote below, moved from main page - Alvesgaspar 11:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
43, 128, 168, 214, 276 (my vote on Febreary 4 had a typo and has been already stroken) --Javierme 10:13, 10
196, 153, 61, 225, 265 - Pluke 12:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]
122, 209, 45, 206, 315 - I had a hard time choosing -- all images were great. - diff Utcursch 13:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
90, 53, 281, 103, 67 - Jtico 13:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC) diff Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]
103, 250, 61, 209, 276 - EyOne 14:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
281 - The most stunning picture in history, IMHO. diff --69.134.237.245 14:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
250, 137, 243, 61, 110 - IronGargoyle 18:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]
297, 137, 183, 308, 254 - Order of priority, from right to left - Marmoulak 20:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)diff[reply]
128, 136, 199, 243, 254 - historicair 18:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
85, 112, 158, 198, 237 - João Carvalho 18:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
38, 76, 260, 11, 121 - fr:Utilisateur:Jraf 20:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC) diff Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page
129, 68, 28, 226, 318 – good work overall - NEUROtiker 21:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5, 33, 58, 129, 245 - 33 and 58 are my personal favourite --Rohieb 21:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC) diff1 Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]
183, 114, 75, 307, 277 - after hours of deciding --B0b 22:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]
5, 15, 33, 119 - Jarke 23:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]
11, 316, 300, 273, 216 - some people in portrait photos have my votes - Verdy p 00:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
139, 299, 43, 235 - Poppy 01:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
33, 281, 121 - Alton 06:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]
270 - Fitting for an encyclopædia - diff Tunheim 12:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
58, 134, 162, 196, 272 - Aconcagua 15:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
212, 244, 31, 47, 249 - Rüdiger Wölk 15:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
75, 39, 250 - MECU 17:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5, 297, 315 - MichaelFrey 17:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
38, 106, 114, 206, 243 - diff Robotsintrouble 18:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
164, 308, 27, 60, 56 - Todas muy bonitas.--Jorval (Chao.) 18:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
237, 238, 273, 303, 170 - Prazak 19:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
235, 315, 317, 265, 146 - StaraBlazkova 19:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
46, 83, 137, 199, 256 - J.smith 22:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC) diff Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]
69, 182, 93, 262, 273 - Zimbres 22:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
153, 61, 165, 118, 46 - Gugganij 00:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
265, 46, 225, 84, 315 - I prefer 315 because it's hard to make animated Gif + it's rare but useful for wikiprojects. --Patricia.fidi 11:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
33, 71, 254, 226, 260 diff Michel BUZE 08:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]
244, 162, 187, 100, 303 - Albert 03:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
192, 175, 316, 152, 281 - diff - Jeffrey O. Gustafson 09:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
15, 159, 309, 196, 270 - Rf 12:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
58, 315, 12, 32, 194, 53 - 53 is the best Tatoute 13:27, 6 February 2007 too many votes! Verdy p 15:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
25, 137, 164, 226, 266 - Olegivvit 14:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
273, 277, 73, 280, 71 - Enricopedia ⇄ 15:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
93, 224, 61, 147, 56 - Dani 7C3 (talk) 16:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
94, 224, 61, 147, 56 - wrong number - Dani 7C3 (talk) 16:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
305, 38, 16, 184, 92 - these are the ones I love best. -diff Teemeah 16:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
22, 120, 187, 217, 305 - Robespierre 17:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
315, 183, 77, 316, 267 - GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 19:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
250, 254, 68, 62, 100 - Alecs.y 19:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]
58, 82, 105, 171, 169 - Excellent pics, the last one is the best. - Markko 19:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]
42, 64, 85, 250, 265 - ... and many others.--Archenzo 21:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
159, 38, 63, 291, 87 - diff Dystopos 22:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
3, 6, 215, 243, 310 - Ultratomio 05:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
154, 9, 130 - 212.71.37.100 06:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC) No anonymous voting please (see rules above) Lycaon 07:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
130, 171, 299, 172, 233 - Absar 09:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
74, 249, 196, 56 - Donarreiskoffer 09:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
46, 171, 199, 250, 254 - helt 13:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
38, 62, 79, 139, 172 - Klugschnacker 14:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5, 57, 70, 76, 290 - Atluxity 15:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
75 - beautiful, just stunning. JoeSmack 17:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]
284, 254, 273, 83, 310 - Manuel Menal 18:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]
91, 21, 152, 62, 272 Oonagh 21:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]
75, 90, 122, 127, 307 - diff Axelv 21:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Picture of the Year/2006/Voting phase 1/archive 3

Navigation menu

Search