Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Gallinago-delicata-002.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Gallinago-delicata-002.jpg, featured
[edit]- Info created by Mdf - uploaded by Mdf - nominated by MichaelMaggs -- MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Richard Bartz (talk) 07:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Can you please add geocoding? --norro 08:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Wwcsig (talk) 09:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Ukuthenga Starke Unschärfe des Hintergrundes hebt das Motiv hervor - klasse! 09:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support erstaunlich bei 700 --Böhringer (talk) 10:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
NeutralThe details on the feathers are not sharp. I would expect a better sharpness from a picture that was downsampled to 2 mpx. But I would also expect the original size picture. --S23678 (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose After some thought, the bird should really be bigger for FP. --S23678 (talk) 17:06, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support Could use a little more sharpness but everything else is well done. --Calibas (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Aqwis (talk) 22:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per S23678 and also very small, considering that more than half the picture is a single, featureless gradient (some may confuse it with bokeh). Lycaon (talk) 23:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose As Lycaon. --Karelj (talk) 19:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 06:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Support --Eagle01 (talk) 17:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Vote of blocked user struck. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)- Support Enough detail for me, beautiful composition, and until someone catches birds better than mdf, I see no reason why we should oppose as long as the criterias are met. Benh (talk) 18:54, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support Details are perfectly visible, I like the composition. I find it funny that before Mdf was uploading pictures with a tight crop, now that he's uploading them with more breathing room that's not liked by some.--Dori - Talk 20:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice pic, but lighting is dull, and it does not wow me. I'd also like it to be sharper. Crapload (talk) 00:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support Impressive --Reflection of Perfection (talk) 06:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
result: 11 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer (talk) 14:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)