Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ZSSK Class 475.1.webm

File:ZSSK Class 475.1.webm, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2016 at 12:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:ZSSK Class 475.1.webm Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ZSSK Class 475.1.webm

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
•  Info created by Karel Furiš - uploaded by Daniel Holý CZ - nominated by Daniel Holý CZ -- Daniel Holý (talk) 12:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Daniel Holý (talk) 12:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose the fretful camera work isn't featureable for me --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Reminds me very much of this film, but more than a hundred years later I would like a steadier camera and a little more sharpness for an F-media. cart-Talk 17:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The shaky camera work is the least of my issues. At this point in time technology has advanced enough that we no longer need worry about image quality ... this is very nice in that department. What we need to see is some understanding that videos, films, whatever you want to call the moving image today, need more than one uninterrupted take to work. In this case, even if the camera had been mounted on a tripod to smooth it out I still would have problems with this view that lets that post come in front of the locomotive, waits to pull back suddenly near the end, and doesn't pan to at least follow the train as it passes. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. INeverCry 21:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others, and I think the 1895 film W.carter linked to is better, because it has more action, with all the people. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. The object is most interesting of course but the photographic work is really nothing to be proud of. Apart from the shaking, there’s very poor detail (no TV station would think of broadcasting such a quality) and rookie-level camera handling. Try to zoom softer (no video professional uses motor zoom) and pan a bit more. But first of all, use a tripod. --Kreuzschnabel 19:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 20:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)