Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wydma Łącka - luty 2015 (4 of 13).jpg

File:Wydma Łącka - luty 2015 (4 of 13).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2020 at 20:00:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wydma Łącka - luty 2015 (4 of 13).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wydma Łącka - luty 2015 (4 of 13).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
•  Info created by Azi 92 - uploaded by Azi 92 - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 20:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Andrei (talk) 20:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it's not sharp enough, has chromatic aberrations and a non too impressive resolution.--Peulle (talk) 21:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

• It's an overstatement, Peulle. In my humble opinion, it is sharp enough and is perfectly fine. Or maybe I missed a point in time when three thousand pixels became not enough. --Andrei (talk) 21:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Puelle. Not sharp enough to make up for the low resolution StellarHalo (talk) 23:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Peulle. Resolution and sharpness must be better. --XRay 💬 09:19, 8 November 2020 (UTC)