Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wildfire in Yellowstone Natinal Park produces Pyrocumulus clouds1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2009 at 23:27:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 23:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 23:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)- Support, --Vprisivko (talk) 09:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Very neat. I really like the clouds. Tiptoety talk 19:22, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- MJJR (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Question Hasn't this been nominated (and declined) before? -- H005 
21:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- You have a good memory! A different version was nominated and declined here. I ajusted the colors a litlle bit now. I did not want to upload over the other file because it was nominated (not by me) and declined on English wikipedia too here. I decided, that, if somebody liked the image enough to nominate it on Eglish Wikipedia FP, I'd better keep that version too :) Thanks for fixing my spelling :)--Mbz1 (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Comment There's a typo in the file name that should be fixed. -- H005 21:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Oppose sorry to spoil the show again but I still think (as in the previous nomination) that this photo does not show reality due to over-post-processing. --AngMoKio (talk) 11:58, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've seen many wildfires, but only once pyrocumulus clouds. I believe you are much luckier than I am. You've seen lots of them, and know quite well how they look in reality :)--Mbz1 (talk) 12:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- So far I have seen smoke of wildfires in California (in 2007) and South East Asia. But that is not the reason why I oppose. The reason why I oppose is because i know how clouds look that were "dramatized" with Photoshop. You obviously reduced it a bit since your last nomination...but it is for me still more than obvious. Furthermore this is sth you do with a lot of your pictures, which I regret bcs you don't just falsify reality but you make a good picture bad. I might give a pro to this picture if you would upload it without the post-processing. --AngMoKio (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've seen many wildfires, but only once pyrocumulus clouds. I believe you are much luckier than I am. You've seen lots of them, and know quite well how they look in reality :)--Mbz1 (talk) 12:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Aqwis (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support —Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality problems in the sky, looks like posterization from overprocessing. --S23678 (talk) 01:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Berthold Werner (talk) 15:32, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena
