Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tribuna di palazzo grimani 00,4.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Tribuna di palazzo grimani 00,4.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2019 at 08:49:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Italy
- Info created by Sailko - uploaded by Sailko - nominated by Sailko -- Sailko (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Sailko (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, it’s an interesting and creative composition but it looks to me like nothing is quite in focus. Also there’s a couple of stitching errors which I have noted on the image page. Cmao20 (talk) 14:25, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Cmao20, please do not make the notes on the image page per this: Commons talk:Featured picture candidates/Archive 20#Notes on a photo. Thanks, --Cart (talk) 14:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Cart, sorry, didn't realise that rule. Have deleted the notes on the image page and put them on the thumbnail in the nomination page. Thanks for telling me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- No problem, it's not an absolute rule but a way of avoiding confusion for those using the file who are not involved in FPC. A note with "stitching error" must be bewildering for someone just looking for a photo of the building. :-) --Cart (talk) 15:37, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Great motif but the image quality is unfortunately not at FP level, it lacks sharpness --Poco2 18:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --BoothSift 21:01, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:58, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. Nothing in the image is sharp, but the two pillars at the top are definitely out of focus and distracting from the rest. Also the floor looks very distorted and thus misrepresented and there are some stitching errors. – Lucas 14:44, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Awkward crop, unnatural projection and soft detail near skylight. Daniel Case (talk) 16:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 16:15, 11 April 2019 (UTC)