Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thymelicus sylvestris (female) - Kulna.jpg

File:Thymelicus sylvestris (female) - Kulna.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2022 at 18:40:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Thymelicus sylvestris (female) - Kulna.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thymelicus sylvestris (female) - Kulna.jpg

3125

1750

250

175

6000

4000

blurred hairs

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Hesperiidae_(Skippers)
•  Info all by Ivar (talk) 18:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Question Detail of the eye is great, but how come so many of the hairs are out of focus with 101 images? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment please add a note, where are they oof? I remind you, that small skipper has average body length 12–15 mm. --Ivar (talk) 06:46, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

• I marked the worst blurred hairs and a stacking error area, but there are several others. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment those ca 1 mm long hair are not oof, they were in the shade and the background is more hair. This is the best sharpness I could get with my old camera. As for small stacking error, it's fixed. --Ivar (talk) 14:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
• I'm not sure which stacking error you fixed. The one I can still see is the leg in the background where I have put the note box back. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:49, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment did you empty the cache memory? --Ivar (talk) 19:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

• No, I forgot, sorry. Leg is good now. By the way, do you use Helicon Focus Method A, B, or C as standard or test on every image? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

• imo I did not change default settings of the program. --Ivar (talk) 10:45, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

• Helicon Focus 8 has 3 options. I used Method B for my skipper above; the other choices weren't so good. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Very detailed IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Like Charles, I would have expected more of the wings to be tack sharp when 101 exposures were stacked, but the result is still excellent given the tiny size of the animal and the high resolution, and because Ivar has applied only mild sharpening in post-processing. --Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:37, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Stepro (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:41, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support, mainly for the parts in front of the wings (the eyes, etc.). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Hesperiidae_(Skippers)