Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tübingen Altstadt April 2014.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Tübingen Altstadt April 2014.JPG, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2016 at 20:04:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. -- Felix König ✉ 20:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Felix König ✉ 20:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)- Support --AmaryllisGardener talk 23:42, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Comment - There are a lot of things I like about this photo, including the clouds and variety of colors, but I find this photo a bit borderline for a feature because I'm not sure about the crops, especially the one on the left side that cuts off a building in the foreground. I'm leaning toward a "support" vote right now but will think about it for a while. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Having been there myself, I do not find enough "wow" in this photo. --Rftblr (talk) 07:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)- strong oppose We have thousands of photos of towns taken from an elevated viewpoint. This pretty view is unremarkable with unremarkable light. It isn't particularly sharp and the distant scenery is mostly a smudge. Felix, 3.75MP is grossly insufficient for FP landscape in 2016, without hugely compensating factors. Please compare our existing FPs which combine fantastic detail with good light and often panoramic views. -- Colin (talk) 09:38, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose per Colin. I like the way this was set up (although, not having been there, I defer to Robert when he implies better shots might be possible). But Colin is right about the technical failings (most noticeable at the sides) that derail this one. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that there is potential here, but the composition and sharpness are not outstanding. I am looking for some lines that my eyes would like to go through but there are none and the most interesting subject, the bell tower is centered. Sorry, not a FP to me. --Poco2 23:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. The Quality is not at FP level, the light is relatively flat even though it's not far away from being good, the roof-to-everything-else ratio is a little high. — Julian H.✈ 15:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. INeverCry 04:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
