Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Suurupi alumine tuletorn panoraam.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Suurupi alumine tuletorn panoraam.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2013 at 07:32:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info Suurupi wooden lighthouse, all by Ivar (talk) 07:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 07:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --ArildV (talk) 09:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose The scenery is nice but I am not convinced of the photo due to the following reasons: 1. Light is far from being perfect - you've photographed against the light to capture the sunset - but this kind of photo imho only work with a smaller area of non-lightened objects (e.g. rocks at the coast, silhouettes of buildings or smaller parts of a building). With your photo the motive is lighthouse with meadow at a coast with setting sun. In this case I would say the sunset distracts from the lighthouse. 2. There could be problems with overexposure at the clouds. There is a green-colored border around some gray clouds. 3. There is remarkable blurr at the yellow flowers in the foreground and at the trees at the left near the lighthouse. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I can't see any green-colored cloud borders, please add a note, where do you see it. Motion blur is there, because the weather was very windy and cold (I was hiding from a wind in a ditch for some time). But at this scenery I kind of like it, because it reflects the weather perfectly. --Ivar (talk) 10:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- I've added a note. As said: I am not 100% sure with the overexposure - here are better image editing experts than me. To your comment: Maybe that the weather is reflected perfectly the light is nonetheless not beneficial for your main motive: more than 50 percent of the the photo is in shadow. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I can't see any green-colored cloud borders, please add a note, where do you see it. Motion blur is there, because the weather was very windy and cold (I was hiding from a wind in a ditch for some time). But at this scenery I kind of like it, because it reflects the weather perfectly. --Ivar (talk) 10:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support I don't think that it is compulsory of all the time to photograph in the sun. It is a good illustration of the maritime and windy atmosphere that I often saw in my region. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support a pragmatic composition (lighthouse + the object for its function: ship) in a romantic arrangement (sundown), the windy blurs are plausible --Neptuul (talk) 18:14, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Very well put by Neptuul. --Vamps (talk) 19:08, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support JKadavoor Jee 03:28, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 22:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas