Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stropharia aeruginosa in nature park Jesenicko in 2014.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2014 at 19:48:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by Chmee2 -- Chmee2 (talk) 19:48, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Chmee2 (talk) 19:48, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Very much weak Support. Very much bad DoF, but color of the mushroom is magnificent. ArionEstar (talk) 21:21, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 05:56, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support Basik07 (talk) 08:44, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 10:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The mushroom is nice, but the rest is not interesting, specially the pole(?) at the back. A closer crop might work. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for opinion. You might be right, but I like this composition better :) But really thank for input. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 16:29, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Aktron (talk) 21:43, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose DoF a bit small and disturbing wood behind the mushroom. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 06:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose because of composition and DoF --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:44, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose very very pity, a false focus level. The main: the mushroom isn't sharp enough and the DOF is too low. Otherwise a perfect composition. The focus level must be to the middle of the mushroom hat with f/16 for a best shoot. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for advice :) Hopefully that next time, I will be able to do it better ;) Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 16:29, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm looking forward for a better image . --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:45, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- I was sad, at first glance I expected to be able to support, I hope she comes back -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 22:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for advice :) Hopefully that next time, I will be able to do it better ;) Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 16:29, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results: