Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sonny Bill Williams 2013 (1).JPG

File:Sonny Bill Williams 2013 (1).JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2016 at 00:27:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sonny Bill Williams 2013 (1).JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sonny Bill Williams 2013 (1).JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by Suid-Afrikaanse - uploaded by Suid-Afrikaanse - nominated by Suid-Afrikaanse -- Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 00:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 00:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it's less than 2 million pixels, too small for FP

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Daniel Case (talk) 01:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment the photo just falls short of the pixel count, but i think it still looks quite detailed and looks like it was taken professionally with good technical skill and composition.Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 09:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  • I don't think it would pass anyway: the blurred micro, and the hidden arm(?) below the watch are not OK for a FP. Yann (talk) 14:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry but i don't understand what you mean with good composition. I explain: there's a microphone blurred on the right and the person crop on the left is also worse. And for the last is Small! Sorry if I am crude but is the true for me --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 16:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per LivioAndronico. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't see Daniel Case's FPX being officially challenged, but since voting is still going on, I'll oppose it per Daniel and Livio. INeverCry 20:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 14:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)