Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:S-Bahn at Hauptbahnhof Berlin.JPG

File:S-Bahn at Hauptbahnhof Berlin.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 13:07:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:S-Bahn at Hauptbahnhof Berlin.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:S-Bahn at Hauptbahnhof Berlin.JPG

•  Info A train of the S-Bahn Berlin arriving at Hauptbahnhof. All by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Wow --LivioAndronico talk 14:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Kreuzschnabel 15:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --P e z i (talk) 16:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent, and even more so when one has been there and can personally vouch for this being a good, representative image of the place. Daniel Case (talk) 23:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --· Favalli ⟡ 01:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --ArildV (talk) 10:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 07:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 09:12, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment -A bit of oversharpening on the text on the sign.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • hmm, I don't know, I've applied a very moderate sharpening. Decreasing it again might turn out problematic for corner and border sharpness. So I better leave it as it is. It's always a compromise... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
    • What if you applied a localized blur tool? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
      • Well, honestly, that's beyond my technological expertise, I'm afraid. Anyway, I also believe that the oversharpening is really not that bad here. I didn't notice it at all before you mentioned it. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:54, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image has nothing to say except that its creator has the capability of playing with exposure time and maybe IrfanView. It has no relevance at all with regards to content, but all the relevance possible with regards to vanity. The standard displayed is too low for the image to be regarded as exceptional. --89.247.68.99 04:25, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, anonymous votes do not count in here. --Kreuzschnabel 05:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ivar (talk) 06:34, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors