Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rometsch lawrence2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Rometsch lawrence2.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2015 at 10:36:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
- Info created and uploaded by Palauenc05 - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 10:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 10:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good photo of a beautiful car. It's parked somewhere in the meadows? --Tremonist (talk) 12:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 13:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice subject but distracting reflections and the background, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 14:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Laitche: "distracting reflections of the background", maybe ?--Jebulon (talk) 15:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: Yes, of and and, also building in the hood (bonnet), other cars in the hubcaps are distracting too, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 15:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ah ok. Thanks for answer. I personaly don't find it so disturbing.--Jebulon (talk) 16:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: BTW, what about the red and white truck of this photo (in the reflection), nothing disturbing? :) --Laitche (talk) 16:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Why this question ? No, not so disturbing. I suppose reflections on sheet metal of vehicles are almost unavoidable... But I'm not very interested by cars, and completely ignorant in this matter.--Jebulon (talk) 16:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: Thanks, just wanted to know others opinion :) --Laitche (talk) 17:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Why this question ? No, not so disturbing. I suppose reflections on sheet metal of vehicles are almost unavoidable... But I'm not very interested by cars, and completely ignorant in this matter.--Jebulon (talk) 16:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: BTW, what about the red and white truck of this photo (in the reflection), nothing disturbing? :) --Laitche (talk) 16:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ah ok. Thanks for answer. I personaly don't find it so disturbing.--Jebulon (talk) 16:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: Yes, of and and, also building in the hood (bonnet), other cars in the hubcaps are distracting too, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 15:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Laitche: "distracting reflections of the background", maybe ?--Jebulon (talk) 15:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose IMHO the background ruins it.--Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 15:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. Exploringlife (talk) 16:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Fine with me --Ivar (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support A very good photo of a very rare care -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a very exciting lighting, and unfortunate setting. Not a fan of photos of cars taken at short to moderate focal lengths. - Benh (talk) 19:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. Nothing wrong with how the car itself is photographed; it's definitely a QI. However, the background does it in ... it almost fades into the dark area underneath, and the chaotic patterns of the nature around it are undeniably distracting from the vehicle's classic lines and contours. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose the background is ok to me. But wide-angle and too high position of photographer. QI ok but in my eyes not FP. --Ralf Roleček 10:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results: