Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rollout of STS-128.jpg

File:Rollout of STS-128.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2009 at 01:45:53

•  Info created by Justin Dernier - uploaded and nominated by TonyBallioni -- TonyBallioni (talk) 01:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator -- TonyBallioni (talk) 01:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support great shot --ianaré (talk) 05:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose This version because of image noise, support the noise reduced version below. -- JovanCormac 06:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Two+two=4 (talk) 02:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 13:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Noise reduced version, featured

•  Info Reduced image noise with Neat Image, resulting in this version. -- JovanCormac 06:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Denoised version. -- JovanCormac 06:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment At the moment, both versions have aspects that I like. I like the reduced noise version, but the dramatic depth of the sky is more prominent on the original. Julielangford (talk) 07:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Why don't you support them both? :) --Lošmi (talk) 22:06, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
    • I could? I didn't know that, but wouldn't it be the same if I did nothing? The outcome wouldn't make much difference, if I cast the same vote on each. Julielangford (talk) 23:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
      • Yes you can. It wouldn't make much difference in choosing which one will be featured (the one which has more support votes minus oppose). But it makes a difference in one of these getting FP status at all. --Lošmi (talk) 23:59, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support JovanCormac's edit. prefer it slightly to original. Julielangford (talk) 00:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 22:06, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Normally I can't tell much difference between noise reduced versions and the original, but in this case I agree with Julie in that the original captures the skys depth better, either way I hope one of these pictures makes it in (obviously ;-) ) TonyBallioni (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Two+two=4 (talk) 02:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support this version --George Chernilevsky (talk) 09:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ianaré (talk) 15:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Theklan (talk) 18:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:28, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support   ■ MMXX^talk  19:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Didn't anyone notice the tilt? Otherwise good, I'll support it when the tilt is fixed. -- H005 (talk) 20:28, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Iamthestig (talk) 23:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support —Andrei S. _Talk 12:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Distracting foreground. —kallerna™ 09:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- TonyBallioni (talk) 12:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --FriedC (talk) 01:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose with conditional Support if the tilt is fixed per H005. --Korall (talk) 18:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Result: 13 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 13:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

The voting period for this candidate is over, but the FPCBot is leaving this for manual investigation due to use of multiple images. Closing this candidate needs to be done using the manual instructions.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:38, 26 August 2009 (UTC)